Index to Hardback 4

Public Court Documents
June 22, 1992 - August 25, 1992

Index to Hardback 4 preview

4 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Index to Hardback 4, 1992. d095e0cc-a246-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9974c98c-9cac-425e-bb92-bdee0b1a4442/index-to-hardback-4. Accessed July 29, 2025.

    Copied!

    6/30/92 

7/2/92 

7/14/92 

7/14/92 

7/15/92 

7/15/92 

7/15/92 

7/16/92 

‘ * 
MILO SHEFF, et al. v. WILLIAM A. O’NEILL 

Case # 2207-02 H/B #4 

Contents 
  

Letter to John Whelan (Asst. Attorney General) 
from Philip Tegeler re revision to Professor 
Collier’s expert description, originally filed 
JANUArY 19, 1991 es csv vsssvessvssrsssvervosne vos 

C
a
”
 

a
”
 

N
s
”
 

N
e
”
 

Letter to John Whelan (Asst. Attorney General) 
from Philip Tegeler re notice as to documents 
requested for deposition of Robert Brewer 
scheduled for July 14, 1992 ..osevovinvsnoseee 

V
a
”
 

N
a
”
 

N
u
”
 

u
e
”
 

Letter to Philip Tegeler from John Whelan re 
deposition schedule being consistent with his 
records and raising a couple of points re 
Phe SChedUle uci sve vnmosovsnsvnmonsvonsevens 

N
e
”
 

a
e
”
 

a
”
 

u
e
?
 

Letter to Hon. Harry Hammer from Martha Watts 
(Asst. Attorney General) enclosing: 

Defendants’ Motion for Extension of 
Time in Which to Pursue Discovery ......... 

Letter to John Whelan from Philip Tegeler 
giving notice as to the documents requested for 
deposition of Christine Rossell scheduled for 
oT EE RRS SINR ST I Sh a SE 

W
a
”
 

N
s
”
 

N
a
s
t
”
 

u
e
”
 

Letter to Hon. Harry Hammer from Philip Tegeler 
enclosing: 

) 
) 
) 

Notice of Disclosure of Expert Witnesses ) 

) 
Plaintiffs’ Fourth Identification of Expert) 
Witnesses Pursuant to Practice Book §220(D)) 

Notice of Service of Fifth Request for Product- ) 
ion of Documents .. sv veevisiocenns FEAR SP a PE ) 

Plaintiffs’ Fifth Request for Production of ) 
DOCUMECIILS ¢ssidis ec snes tts ssninmnssvssssousvesene sie ) 

Defendants’ Amended Disclosure of Expert ) 
ENO SSOS oh vs tnnnns svt etna onnevemtsne eines viene ) 

Letter to Philip Tegeler from John R. Whelan re ) 
misplaced diskette containing data used by ) 
plaintiffs’ expert Dr. Robert Crain before it ) 
COU1d PE CODICA vos viv tumensssvsssvsnssssesssess ) 

 



MILO SHEFF, et al. v. WILLIAM A. O’NEILL 
Case # 2207-02 H/B #4 

  

    

Date Contents No 

7/21/92 Request for Leave to Amend Complaint ........... 10 

7/21/92 Amendment tO COMPlAING «ov u vec tune asvarvevecases 11 

7/21/92 Letter to John Whelan from Philip Tegeler re 
missing data tape and continuing efforts to 
Jocate and YELUIII + voc ivsviosesnsssssnnsessnesse 12 

7/22/92 Letter to John Whelan from Philip Tegeler to ) 
arrange scheduling for the remaining expert ) 
GepOSiLioONS iN CASE vue vensninss srr ens vovnnsss ) 13 

7/23/92 Letter to John Whelan from Philip Tegeler ) 
enclosing deposition notices for the additional) 
witnesses plaintiffs seek to depose as follows:) 

) 
Peter Behuniak, Peter Prowda, ) 
William Congero, John Mannix, ) 
Alphonse Wright, Marcial Quavos, ) 
Gerald N. Tirozzi, Thomas Breen, ) 
Dr. Vincent L. Ferran@ino ..cecessas ) 14 

7/23/92 Defendants’ Amended Disclosure of Expert ) 
WIENCSSES svt vss rnnnr tent veviovmvsenvsseoen vies ) 15 

7/23/92 Letter to Hon. Harry Hammer from Philip Tegeler ) 
objecting to Defendants’ Motion for Extension ) 
of Time in which to Pursue Discovery d/d 7/14/92) 16 

7/28/92 Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time to ) 
Pale Depo LONE «vast iv snr vn sninie ons aims sivas onio ) 17 

7/30/92 Notice of deposition of the following: ) 

) 
William: A. Gordon, 9:30. am 9/22/92 weeds ) 
Gary Natriello, Teachers College, Columbia ) 

University, 9:30 am 9/24/92 «ovens ) 
Eddie Davis, Principal, Weaver High School ) 18 

1:00 DM 9/29/92 Wr vavsvrvriveivmnssvnes ) 
Donald Carso, Principal, McDonough School, ) 

O130 AM 07/2079 isu i en ras ) 
Raul Montanez-Pitre, Principal, Hooker ) 

SChool, (9:30 am 10/1/92. .c.eavavivinen ) 
Edna Negron, Principal, Betances School, ) 

1:00 pm 10/1/92 ov dvvnvnoasnvnnivnsvns ) 

 



  

  

8/3/92 

8/5/92 

8/10/92 

8/12/92 

8/13/92 

8/13/92 

8/14/92 

8/14/92 

8/14/92 

MILO SHEFF, et al. v. WILLIAM A. O’NEILL 
Case # 2207-02 H/B #4 

Contents 
  

Letter to Hon. Harry Hammer from Martha Stone 
enclosing: 

Plaintiffs’ Preliminary List of Non-Expert 
PitNESSEE tue ss svn vss viinnaas ots vaninsssinies ) 

Preliminary Disclosure of Non-Expert Witnesses 

Supplement to Defendants’ July 28, 1992 Motion ) 
for Extension of Time to Take Depositions .... ) 

Notice of Deposition of the following: ) 

Winzola Perry, 1:30 pm 10/20/92 veceosvnes ) 
Diane Cloud, 9:30 am 10/20/92 eee evs esses ) 
Brad Noel, 1:30 pm 10/15/92 vitro nivsiess ) 
Thomas O/’Connor, 9:30 am 10/22/92 sees sene ) 
Gladys Hernandez, 9:30 am 10/15/92 «suse es ) 

Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to ) 
Plaintiffs Fifth Request for Production and ) 
and Second Set Of Interrogatories ..cceeeceveese ) 

Letter to Marianne Lado from John Whelan re ) 
setting of another date for Dr. Armour’s ) 
deposition since (1) he has not received another) 
copy of diskette and (2) the considerable time ) 
it will take Dr. Armour to develop an under- ) 
standing of the data file and conduct analyses. ) 

Letter to John Whelan from Philip Tegeler giving) 
notice as to documents requested for deposition ) 
of William Congero scheduled for 8/26/92 ....... ) 

Letter to Clk of the Court from Philip Tegeler 
enclosing: 

Motion for Extension of Time to File 
Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Responses 
to Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories 

) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 

Notice of Deposition of Michael B. Levin, ) 
Vice President and Research Director, ) 
Connecticut Policy and Economic Council, Inc., ) 
10:00 am 0/17/92 vv vnvrivs sna rns sbi sane nmsnseses ) 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

 



4 N 
MILO SHEFF, et al. v. WILLIAM A. O’NEILL 

Case # 2207-02 H/B #4 

  

    Date Contents No 

8/17/92 Letter to Hon. Harry Hammer from Philip Tegeler ) 
enclosing: ) 

) 
Plaintiffs’ Objection to Defendants’ Motions ) 
for Extension of Time to Take Depositions ). 28 

and ) 

) 
Plaintiffs’ Final Identification of Expert ) 
Witnesses Pursuant to Practice Book §220(D) ) 

8/17/92 Letter to Hon. Harry Hammer from Richard ........ ) 
Blumenthal requesting that a court reporter be ) 29 
present at the status conference on 8/26/92 ..... ) 

8/20/92 Letter to John R. Whalen from Marianne E. Lado ) 
enclosing a second diskette containing the ...... } 30 
requested data used by Dr. Robert Crain ........ ) 

8/20/92 Letter to John Whelan from Philip Tegeler re ) 
notification as to whether the state plans to call) 
or withdraw Patricia Downs and Thomas Steahr as } “31 
witnesses and enclosing Subpoena Duces Tecum ) 
addressed tO Thomas StEANY + ecvessrsvssnvrnevoson ) 

8/20/92 Letter to John Whelan from Philip Tegeler enclos- ) 
ing: i332 

) 
Deposition Subpoena for David Armor ........ ) 

8/24/92 Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Responses to ) 
Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories ........ 33 

8/24/92 Notice of Service of Plaintiffs’ Second Amended ) 
Responses to Defendants’ First Set of } 34 
INE err OREO IRS ov snd sv sinss vinns ovine vne nine vineswe ) 

8/24/92 Motion for Finding of Non-Compliance with Pre- ) 
trial Order and Appropriate Remedial Orders ..... ) 35 

8/25/92 Defendants’ Motion for Order of Compliance ...... 36 

8/25/92 Memorandum in Support of Defendants’ Motion for ) 
Order Of COMPLIANCE sce esessnesiososmsnsevsoseeses Ys 37 

8/25/92 Order granting Defendants’ Motion for Order of } .. 38 
COMPLIANCE vo vvie ne onnissssossnmssennsesnssiineneeesnss )

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top