Stipulation
Public Court Documents
December 14, 1977
3 pages
-
Case Files, Hatcher v. Methodist Hospital - Hardbacks. Stipulation, 1977. 4cb477c1-5484-f111-ab0f-7c1e527d5379. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9a2658f7-9b53-41a0-ab56-9bf18f7c63ca/stipulation. Accessed October 10, 2026.
Copied!
[||88a5fa9a-d2fd-4603-af35-57323e78a64b||] FICED
ECT 1977.
At : M
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FRANCIS T. GRANDYS, CLERK
U. S. DISTRICT COURT
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
HAMMOND DIVISION
BERNICE TERRY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
VS. No. H 76-373
METHODIST HOSPITAL OF GARY,- INC.,
et al.,
N
n
?
N
t
C
s
?
N
w
?
ww
?
Na
nt
wm
a
u
t
“w
ut
?
au
st
Defendants
RICHARD GORDON HATCHER, et al., )
| )
Plaintiffs )
)
VS. ) No. H 77-154
) -
METHODIST HOSPITAL OF GARY, INC., )
et. al., )
)
Defendants )
STIPULATION
The undersighed, by their attorneys or representatives,
hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. That defendant Joseph A. Califano agrees that
- the enforcement of 42 C.F.R. §100.109 (a) will
be tolled as of this date until this Court has
entered a final judgment in the above-captioned
consolidated cases, or until a final decision
is reached in the highest Court of Appeals to
which such a judgment is appealed, whichever date ..
is later.
2 That the Northern Indiana Health Systems Agency,
Inc. and the Indiana State Board of Health agree
that the enforcement of 42 C.F.R. §100.109 (a)
will be tolled .as of this date until this Court
has entered a final judgment in the above-captioned
consolidated cases, or until a final decision
is reached in the highest Court of Appeals to
which such a judgment is appealed, whichever date
is later.
That the parties hereto agree that Methodist Hospital
of Gary's Project Numbers 212 and 213 shall be
and the same are hereby exempt from review pursuant
to 42 C.F.R. §100.103(a) (2) (v) in the event that
cost increase or increases due to inflation or
as a result of any requirement of or change as
defined in 42 C.F.R. §100.103(a) (1) initiated
by the United States, or any agency thereof, or
the State of Indiana, or any agency thereof, or
any combination of said factors results in the
actual cost of either project exceeding the initial
projected cost on either project.
That the parties hereto agree that in the event
of a change in Projects 212 and 213, as defined
in 42 C.F.R. §100.103(a) (1) initiated by the United
States, or any agency thereof, or the State of
Indiana, or any agency thereof, or any combination
of said factors, all parties will have notice
of said changes by the agency requiring the changes,
and an opportunity to be heard before the agency
requiring the changes, and before the Court.
That the State of Indiana agrees not to enforce
42 C.F.R. §100.103(a) (2) (v) and 42 C.F.R. §100.106,
if any change in Projects 212 and 213 is ordered
by the Department of Health, Education and Welfare
or the Court.
That the Department of Health, Education and Welfare
will not take action against the State of Indiana,
or any agency thereof, for not enforcing Section
1122 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §1320
a-1l; and implementing regulations 42 C.F.R. §100.103 (a)
(2) (v) and 42 C.F.R. §100.106 in the event a change
in Projects 212 and 213 is ordered by the Department
of Health, Education and Welfare or the Court.
That the Methodist Hospital of Gary must give
the designated planning agency of the State of
Indiana notice of any capital expenditure as defined
in 42. C.F.R. $100.103{a) (2) (11).
That the Department of Health, Education and Welfare
will give notice and an opportunity to be heard
to the plaintiffs, Methodist Hospital of Gary,
Inc. and the State of Indiana, prior to issuance
of findings of its Lake County Hospital Review.
9. That the parties hereto do not by this stipulation’
and agreement waive any other administrative or
legal remedies which they may have with regard
to the above-described projects or reviews.
10. That defendant Methodist Hospital of Gary, Inc.
will have 180 days after the Court has entered
a final judgment, or after a final decision is
reached in the highest Court of Appeals to which
such a judgment is appealed, whichever date is
later, to obligate its funds as required by 42
C.P.R. 8100.109(a).
En ea]
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT SECRETARY --
OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE
METHODIST HOSPITAL OF- GARY; INC: - _
) hg
5 Eh a 0 z le TG
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF HEALTH
BY: rl a eo Pls
\ \
NORTHERN INDIANA HEALTH SYSTEMS
AGENCY, I
BY: .
nN 8
Pod l 4 Lil
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS
Approved this Ll day of Tr, r 1X97 %
x £
—
+3
7” .
le ey Se
JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICFP COURT [||88a5fa9a-d2fd-4603-af35-57323e78a64b||]