Dillard v. City of Elba Plaintiffs' Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees; Statement of James U. Blacksher Under Penalty of Perjury

Public Court Documents
August 31, 1993

Cite this item

Dillard v. City of Elba Plaintiffs' Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees; Statement of James U. Blacksher Under Penalty of Perjury preview

22 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Includes Envelope from Blacksher to Chambers.

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Voting Rights
Matter
- Dillard v. Crenshaw County
Case
- Dillard v. Crenshaw County
U.S. state
- Alabama
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- c1a5b598-b7d8-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Memorandum from Suitts to North Carolina Reapportionment Group; Proposed House Districts Within Cumberland County Populations, 1982. b4b736d9-d792-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/75994111-6095-42ad-b70c-d1d4a2a3bb3d/memorandum-from-suitts-to-north-carolina-reapportionment-group-proposed-house-districts-within-cumberland-county-populations. Accessed May 22, 2025.

Copied!

    TONY HAFFISON, Prcriafl I

MANY FMi€ES DERFNER. V|C}PT.3I,.NI .

a JULIUS t. CHAMBEFS. P.!t Pr6idcnt

STEVESUITTS. Exccudv. Oir.clor a JOSEPH HAAS.Cqrnr.l

75 IIARIETTA STR EET, N.W. ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 (404) 522-8704

MEMORANDUM

TO:

FROM:

RE:

North Carolina ReaPPortionment

Steve Suitts

Proposal for Cunberland CountY

Group

DATE: February 10, L982

House Districts

Herers four districts that fit within Cumberland County
around House District #55 of our proposed plan #1.

Why? You may ask. It's a long story which Leslie
can answer at our meeting.

S.T. S.



PROPOSED
TO BE

HOUSE DISTRICTS WITHIN
ADDED TO PROPOSED HOUSE

PLAI{ NO. 1

CIIIEERLAND COUNTY
DISTRICT f55 OF

HOUSE DISTRICT A

Tract Nurnber Total Population Black Population

94

1,175

360

958

zoL

95

628

430

1r389

252

644

6,205

TOTAL MINORITY

5

6

7

9

18

19. 01

19.02

19. 03

2A

32.0t

32.03

TOTATS

Deviation

2,907

5,135

6,842

6,091

2,740

2,072

5,166

5,067

7,LoZ

2,239

4,229

49,5 89

1t

Black *

L3?,

L9Z



PROPOSED HOUSE DISTRICTS WITHIN CUMBERLAND COUNTY
TO BE ADDED TO PROPOSED HOUSE DISTRICT #53 OF

PLAI,I NO. 1

HOUSE DISTRICT B

Tract Number Total Population Black Population Black t

s77

973

8,085

2,4L6

1,755

908

TOTATS 48,367 L4,494 30t

Deviation lt Total Minority s6t

25. 03 3 ,252

25.04 4,484

34 (Manchester)
26,303

5,098

6,092

3,138

55

56

37



PROPOSED HOUSE
TO BE ADDED

DISTRICTS WITHIN
TO PROPOSED HOUSE

PIA}I NO. 1

CUMBERTAI{D COUNTY
DISTRICT #55 OF

HOUSE DISTRICT C

Tract Nunber

2Z

32 .02

33. 01

33.02

34.03

33.04

35.05

s4 (71st)

TOTALS

Deviation

Total Population Black Population Black t

40t

47*

2,834

5,596

2,239

4,269

6,140

7 ,326

6,822

14,516

49 ,7 42

z*

1,305

1,845

252

3 ,422

918

2,638

L,932

7,568

19, 876

Total Minority



PROPOSED HOUSE
TO BE ADDED

DISTRICTS WITHIN
TO PROPOSED HOUSE

PIA}I NO. 1

CUMBERIAI.ID COUNTY
DISTRICT #53 OF

HOUSE DISTRICT

Tract

15

16. 01

L6 .02

T7

25.01

25.0?

?6

27

z8

29

50

31

Nunber Total

2,323

3,994

4,5L?,

6, 549

4,489

3,453

4,338

3 ,8?8

3,705

2,952

4,270

5,310

Population Black Population

499

L2?

804

508

956

347

1,396

L,283

647

1,064

1,5 85

64L

9,852

Total Minority

B1ack t

20*

24*

TOTALS

Deviation

49,463

1t

{
=

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Dillard v. City of Elba Plaintiffs' Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees; Statement of James U. Blacksher Under Penalty of Perjury

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in