Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend and Add Plaintiffs

Public Court Documents
December 30, 1997

Cite this item

Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend and Add Plaintiffs preview

3 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Redistricting
Matter
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
Case
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- d321a71b-e00e-f011-9989-002248226c06

Cite this item

Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend and Add Plaintiffs, 1997. d321a71b-e00e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9e2959d6-2854-4040-9974-2f0bc5624113/defendants-response-to-plaintiffs-motion-to-amend-and-add-plaintiffs. Accessed November 19, 2025.

Copied!

. os ree hose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT mn
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA oe a)

EASTERN DIVISION BE 29 *g7

Civil Action No. 4-86-CV-104302 BAVIZ Yann geen
0.8.0 30 bouns

ES S2T N{ Cen

MARTIN CROMARTIE, THOMAS )

CHANDLER MUSE. and GLENNES )

DODGE WEEKS,

Plaintiffs,

V. DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO

JAMES B. HUNT, JR., in his official AMEND AND ADD PLAINTIFFS

capacity as Governor of the State of North

Carolina, et al.,

Defendants.

NOW COME defendants, by and through counsel, responding to plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend

and Add Plaintiffs by stating that the defendants have no objection to the proposed amendment to

add plaintiffs Weaver and Bourne by amending paragraph one of the Amended Complaint.

This the 30th day of December, 1997.

MICHAEL F. EASLEY

ATT Y GENERAL

Edwin M. Speas, Jr.
Senior Deputy Attorney General

N.C. State Bar No. 4112

Tiare B. Smiley
Special Deputy Attorney General

N. C. State Bar No. 7119

/l ne PY So | Lod foo
( > Norma S. Harrell

Special Deputy Attorney General

N.C. State Bar No. 6654

N.C. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 629

Raleigh, N.C. 27602

(919) 716-6900

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing DEFENDANTS’

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND AND ADD PLAINTIFFS in the above

captioned case upon all parties by depositing these documents in the United States mail, first class

mail. postage prepaid addressed as follows:

Robinson O. Everett

Suite 300 First Union Natl. Bank Bldg.

301 W. Main Street

P.O. Box 386

Durham, NC 27702

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS

Adam Stein

Anita S. Hodgkiss

Ferguson, Stein, Wallas, Adkins,

Gresham & Sumter, P.A.

512 West Franklin Street

Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516

ATTORNEYS FOR APPLICANTS FOR INTERVENTION

This the 50th day of December, 1997.

fare B. Smiley

Special Deputy Attorney General

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend and Add Plaintiffs

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in