Correspondence from Kellogg to Logsdon

Correspondence
October 29, 1982

Correspondence from Kellogg to Logsdon preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Correspondence from Kellogg to Logsdon, 1982. ed353b78-c903-ef11-a1fd-002248219001. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9e46977b-4752-47e1-97c1-69f3b5cc29a1/correspondence-from-kellogg-to-logsdon. Accessed November 05, 2025.

    Copied!

    LAW OFFICES OF 

QUIGLEY & SCHECKMAN 
631 ST. CHARLES AVENUE 

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70130 

TELEPHONE: 504-524-0016 

WILLIAM P. QUIGLEY N ASSOCIATION WITH 
STEVEN SCHECKMAN R. JAMES KELLOGG 

MARK S. GOLDSTEIN 

RONALD J. PURSELI 

October 29, 1982 

Dr. Joe Logsdon 

History Department 

University of New Orleans 

New Orleans, Louisiana 

Re: ‘Major vy. Treen   

Dear Joe: 

We are extremely pleased that you have agreed to testify as an expert witness 

for the plaintiffs in the above-captioned matter relating to the reapportion- 

ment of the Louisiana Congressional districts. This letter will set forth 

the details of our relationship, as 1 appreciate them. 

The trial begins in the federal courthouse in New Orleans on January 31, 1983 

before Federal District Judges Collins and Cassibry and Federal Circuit Judge 

Politz. Trial is expected to last five (5) days and our current best guess 

is that you will testify on the first or second day. 

Although the exact contours of your testimony have not been determined as of 

this date, we probably want you to testify on the following issues: 

1) the role race has played in the career of David Treen. This would 

include focusing on the following areas: 

.a) Treen's association with the States' Rights Party, in- 

cluding his appearance as a presidential elector for that party 

b) Treen's appearances on behalf of groups working to 
ll 'save segregation" 

¢) Treen's political associations with Leander Perez, 

Ross Barnett, etc. 

d) Treen's various races against Hale Boggs and statements 

or papers issued in support of his candidacies  



Dr. Joe Logsdon 

Major v. Treen 

Page 2 

  

  

e) Treen's voting record as a member of Congress, in- 

cluding any statements in debates 

f) any other similar materials you may find 

the role of race in local and Louisiana politics since 1960 or so. 

This would include the following: 

a) details of legislative and popular fight against de- 

segregation of New Orleans Public Schools, especially the numer- 

ous special sessions of the Legislature regarding same 

b) the use of racist appeals 

¢) the use of racial "buzz words" 

I realize this deliniation may be somewhat broader than we spoke earlier, but 

I don't think you will have any problem. If you feel you are unable to develop 

any of these areas, please get in touch with me. We have some material on 

Treen (including his biography) if you feel it would be of any use. 

After looking at our budget, I find we will be able to pay you a fee of four 

hundred ($400) dollars. Obviously, however, if our requests involve signi- 

ficantly more time than anticipated, we are willing to renegotiate your fee. 

The Court has ordered that expert witness reports be exchanged by the parties 

on or before January 5, 1983. Accordingly, we would like a preliminary re- 
port from you on or before December 6 (it need not be in writing) and the 

final report by January 3. We expect the defendants will want to schedule 

your deposition in late December or early January, at a time and place con- 

venient to you. 

We are very excited to be able to work with you and feel your experience 

and expertise will be a great asset to our case. 

If any matter in this letter is unclear or if you have any questions, please 

get in touch with me at your earliest convenience. 

Welcome aboard! 

Sincerely, 

A ) Re, 
\ Wan 

( 

R. James Kellogg 

\ 

cc: Lani Guinier 

Stan Halpin 

Bill Quigley 

Steve Scheckman

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.