Answer to Amended Complaint with Cover Letter

Public Court Documents
October 25, 1973

Answer to Amended Complaint with Cover Letter preview

4 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Compliance with Court Order of November 5, 1971 and Request for Hearing, 1971. 069d8192-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/1512ca1a-56a7-4955-ab3c-ca2735016d73/compliance-with-court-order-of-november-5-1971-and-request-for-hearing. Accessed April 05, 2025.

    Copied!

    --- -

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RONALD BRADLEY, et al,
Plaintiffs,

- v s . -

WILLIAM G. MILLIKEN, et al,
Defendants,

-and-
DETROIT FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, 
LOCAL NO. 231, AMERICAN FEDERATION 
OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO,

Defendant- 
Intervenor,

CIVIL ACTION 
NO. 35257

-and-
DENISE MAGDOWSKI, et al,

Defendants- 
Intervenor.

------- ---------------------------------------- /
COMPLIANCE WITH 
COURT ORDER OF 

NOVEMBER 5, 1971 AND 
REQUEST FOR HEARING

COMES NOW, RILEY AND ROUMELL, by George T. Rouraell, Jr. 
and BEIRNE, WIRTHLIN AND MANLEY by Robert E. Manly, attorneys 
for the Detroit School Board, Defendants in the above cause of 
action and hereby submit the following documents to the Court, 
to-wit:

1. Two Resolutions of the Board of Education as 
passed on December 3, 1971.

2. Plan A referred to in said Resolution.

3• Plan C (special Humanities Schools) referred to 
in said Resolution.

r "  i i

$



Plan.
4. A statement concerning Metropolitan Desegregation

The Detroit School Board Defendants hereby requests at 
a time to be set at the Court's discretion the opportunity to 
present oral argument and testimony concerning the above-named 
plans.

RILEY AND ROUMELL

By:
'George Ro'umell', J'r 
Attorneys for Defendant -ty 
The Board of Education 
the School District of 
the City of Detroit 
720 Ford Building 
Detroit, Michigan 48226 
962-8255

Dated: December 3, 1971

BEIRNE, WIRTHLIN AND MANLEY

RobertE.Manley 
Attorneys for Defendant - 
The Board of Education 
of the School District of 
the City of Detroit 
3312 Carew Tower 
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
STATE OF MICHIGAN)

) SS.
COUNTY OF WAYNE )

I, GEORGE T. ROUMELL, JR., hereby certify that copies 
of the above Compliance with Court Order of November 5, 1971 
and Request for Hearing of Detroit Board of Education Defendants 
have been served on the following attorneys for the parties 
in the above-entitled case by depositing same in envelopes, 
postpaid first class,

-2-



in the United States Mail at Detroit, Michigan, addressed as 
follows on December 3, 1971.

Louis R. Lucas, Esq.
William E. Caldwell, Esq.
Ratner, Sugarmon & Lucas 
525 Commerce Title Building 
Memphis, Tennessee 38103
Nathaniel Jones, General Counsel 
N.A.A.C.P.
1790 Broadway 
New York, New York 10019
E. Winter McCroom, Esq.
3245 Woodburn 
Cincinnati, Ohio 45207
Theodore Sachs, Esq.
Rothe, Marston, Mazey, Sachs, 
O'Connell, Nunn & Freid 
1000 Farmer Street 
Detroit, Michigan 48226
Attorneys for Intervening Defendants
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General 
Seven Story Building 
Lansing, Michigan 48902
Eugene Krasicky, Assistant Attorney 
General
725 Seven Story Building 
Lansing, Michigan 48902
Gerald F. Young 
Assistant Attorney General 
3007 Hillcrest 
Lansing, Michigan 48910
Attorneys for State Defendants

Bruce Miller and Lucille 
Watts

Attorneys for Legal Redress 
Committee

N.A.A.C.P. - Detroit Branch 
2460 First National Buildinc 
Detroit, Michigan 48226
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Alexander B. Ritchie, Esq. 
Fenton, Nederlander, Dodge 
& Barris, P.C.
2555 Guardian Building 
Detroit, Michigan 48226

RILEY AND ROUMELL

trict of the City of Detroit
Subscribed and sworn to before me 
this^ 3rd day of December, 1971.

LINDA M. BESTENI, NOTARY PUBLIC 
Wayne County, Michigan 
My Commission Expires: 8-14-73

3-

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top