Correspondence from Winner to Wallace; Preliminary Request for Documents and Information Concerning Legislative and Congressional Reapportionment
Correspondence
October 19, 1981

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Chisom Hardbacks. Argument April Session of the Supreme Court, 1991. a1df2611-f411-ef11-9f8a-6045bddbf119. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/975613e6-a1c4-4229-8112-d103a2611ad4/argument-april-session-of-the-supreme-court. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
ARGUMENT -- APRIL SESSION Monday, April 15 Monday, April 22 (1) 90-5538 MELKONYAN V. SULLIVAN (1) 90-757 ) CHISOM v. ROEMER 90-1032) UNITED STATES v. ROEMER (Consol.--1 hour) (2) 89-1836 GENTILE V. ST. BAR OF NEVADA (2) 90-813 ) HOUSTON LAWYERS v. ATTY. ) GEN. OF TEXAS (3 ) 90-974 ) LULAC V. ATTY. GEN. OF 90-659 GOLLUST v. KENDELL ) TEXAS (Consol.--1 hour) (4) 90-34 EXXON V. CENTRAL GULF LINES (3) 90-952 CLARK v. ROEMER Tuesday, April 16 (4) 90-368 TOIBB V. RADLOFF (5 ) 907906 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY V. CITIZENS FOR ABATEMENT (6) 90-693 JOHNSON V. HOME ST. BANK (7 ) 109 ORIG. OKLAHOMA V. NEW MEXICO Wednesday, April 17 Tuesday, April 23 (5 ) 90-615 PERETZ V. UNITED STATES (6) 90-762 FREYTAG V. CIR (7 ) 90-769 RENNE v. GEARY Wednesday, April 24 (8) 90-6282 TOUBY V. UNITED STATES (8) 90-5721 PAYNE V. TENNESSEE (9 ) 89-1895 ASTORIA FED. SAVINGS v. SOLIMINO (9) 89-1905 WISCONSIN V. MORTIER (February 27, 1991) NOTICE TO COUNSEL 1. The Clerk timely informs counsel as to the day counsel must be present for oral argument. The Court convenes at 10 a.m. and each case is usually heard on the date assigned. 2. Counsel scheduled to argue must register with the Chief Deputy Clerk in Room G26 at 9:05 a.m. on the day assigned for argument. Identification cards will be issued to the attorneys authorized to occupy seats at argument tables. There is space at the table for three (arguing counsel and two others). If divided argument has been granted and two counsel are to argue, there is room for two arguing counsel and one other. Counsel arguing cases should not introduce themselves nor introduce co-counsel to the Court at the time of argument. A member of the Court should be addressed as "Justice"— not judge. 3. Counsel are expected to take note of time limitations and inquiry should not be made of the Court as to the amount of time remaining. A white light will appear when five minutes remain and a red light when the time has expired unless other arrange- ments are made with the Marshal. Counsel should conclude argument promptly when the red light appears unless responding to a question by a Justice. 4. When counsel desires to reserve time for rebuttal, or when divided argument has been authorized, arrangements may be made with the Marshal, prior to the time the case is called, to have an appropriate signal flashed at a specified time. When counsel have agreed to a division of time for argument, the use of more than the agreed time by one attorney does not extend the total time allotted. During argument counsel should at all times speak into the microphone so that the Justices may hear them and that a clear tape recording can be made. When turning to refer to a visual aid or an exhibit, counsel should be careful to remain within range of the microphone. Counsel should also avoid having notes or books touch the microphone since this seriously interferes with the recording process. 5. Counsel in cases to be argued in the afternoon should assemble at the Clerk's desk in the Courtroom when the noon recess begins. An escort will arrange expedited service in the public cafeteria located in the Court building. 6. If counsel desires to have space reserved in the public section, arguing counsel must contact the Marshal's Office after completion and return of the Argument Form to the Clerk. Only the arguing attorney is normally permitted six guests when argument is not divided; four when divided. A letter concerning a request for reservations, including the names of guests, should be sent to: Honorable Alfred Wong, Marshal, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543. 7. Appropriate attire for counsel is conservative business dress. If formal attire is worn, it should conform with custom. WILLIAM K. SUTER Clerk. 16035-7-89