Correspondence from Everett to Smiley; Fax Cover Sheets; Orders
Correspondence
September 1, 1999

8 pages
Cite this item
-
North Carolina, Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Correspondence from Everett to Smiley; Fax Cover Sheets; Orders, 1999. 6a284e66-da0e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9f68e7c6-801a-46e6-9f66-cecced8432b5/correspondence-from-everett-to-smiley-fax-cover-sheets-orders. Accessed September 09, 2025.
Copied!
% @ on WI (ox EVERETT & EVERETT ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW SUITE 300 R.O. EVERETT (1878-1971) 301 W. MAIN STR KATHERINE R. EVERETT (1893-1992) BEY ROBINSON O. EVERETT P.O. BOX 586 DAWN T. BATTISTE DurHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27702 SANDRA G. HERRING TEL: (919) 682-5691 FAX: (919) 682-5469 OF COUNSEL ROBERT D. HOLLEMAN September 1, 1999 Ms. Tiare B. Smiley Special Deputy Attorney General North Carolina Department of Justice Post Office Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-0629 Re: Cromartie v. Hunt Interrogatories Dear Tiare: This letter is to confirm the contents of our phone conference with you and Adam concerning the Interrogatories we served on both the State Defendants and the Defendant- [ntervenors yesterday, August 31, 1999. In the interest of coming to a mutual agreement and avoiding any further issues about what constitutes a “discrete part” of an interrogatory and is therefore separately counted, we are willing to withdraw Interrogatories #8 and #10 to the Defendant-Intervenors and Interrogatories #25, #26, #29A and #29D to the State-Defendants. You indicated that you had some possible objections to interrogatories and we shall await hearing from you further concerning these possible objections. If we agree that an interrogatory is objectionable, its elimination will reduce the total. If a hearing is scheduled as to the number of interrogatories, then these possible objections could also be considered at that time. If our withdrawal of the above-listed interrogatories does not solve the problem, we will attempt to arrange for a hearing before Judge Boyle or the Magistrate Judge handling this case to discuss the interrogatories. As I mentioned, I already have left a call with David Daniel to see about a possible hearing. Please let us know as soon as possible if a hearing will be necessary. Sincerely, naa Robinson O. Everett cc. Adam Stein ¢— FW: Cromartie depositions -Forwarded Subject: FW: Cromartie depositions -Forwarded Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 16:03:30 -0400 From: "Stein, Adam" <AStein@law.fswags.com> To: "Norman Chachkin" <nchach@erols.com> please forward to Todd > From: Tiare Smiley [SMTP: TSMILEY@MAIL.JUS.STATE.NC.US] > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 5:00 PM > To: astein@law.fswags.com > Subject: ~~ Cromartie depositions -Forwarded > <<Cromartie depositions>> Subject: Cromartie depositions Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 15:50:01 -0400 From: Tiare Smiley <TSMILEY @MAIL.JUS.STATE.NC.US> To: NHARRELL@MAIL.JUS.STATE.NC.US CC: FCARR@MAIL.JUS.STATE.NC.US Doug Markham has confirmed or agreed tentatively: McMahan can go forward on Oct. 1, at 11 am. (Fran, let's send that confirming memo to McMahan) Ron Weber on Sept. 27 at 8:30 am (Weber has a 5;03 flight out) (Fran, call and schedule Kay McGovern and Room 301) Gerry Cohen on Sept. 17 at 8:30, to be continued on another day (they are already talking about taking two days; I am not availabe on the 16th, so could not agree to the 16th and 17th: I have already told them that Gerry is not availbale Sept. 23, 24 & 30 and Oct. 1)(Fran, schedule conference room 301) l'of 1 9/2/99 4:08 PM 08/23/99 MON 13:23 FAX 919 987 4953 FERGUSON STEIN [doo1 FERGUSON, STEIN, WALLAS, ADKINS, GRESHAM & SUMTER, P.A. 312 West Franklin Street « Chapel Hill, NC 27516 = Phone (919) 933-5300 « Fax (919) 967-4953 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SAKE fg T) Date: g 23/54 TIME: AM/PM I ahs cm : | / From: Adam Sten IAS po Phone: 919/933-5300 Fax: 919/967-4953 ¢ Re: __ Cpa tie PLEASE DELIVER TO: Name: MN. Chath kaa FIRM: CITY: TELEPHONE#: TELECOPIER #: _ 2A — Hp — 1SA # OF PAGES (o (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) If there are problems with this transmission, please contact _ Shel at 919/933-5300. Documents Being Faxed: Dyefers COMMENTS: halle LLY The information contained in this facsimile message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication Is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone and return the original message to us at the above address via the U.S. Postal Service. Thank you. — AUG 23 939 13:35 913 887.4553 PAGE. 81 08/23/99 MON 13:24 FAX 919 967 4953 ~~ FERGUSON STEIN @oo2 FUG—ZO—1o5s 11300 CERES UEC @ 91985684160 P.21/05 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ~~ P.O. BOX 26670 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27611 CLERK'S OFFICE % TELEPHONE: (919) 856-4370 FAX: (919) 856-4160 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL TO: Ronson Evere t/ Mackin NeGee/ Tare Smiley Acta Sr FROM: JD) e. Skinner MESSAGE: -- 3 pe order nn Cyomarhe pid Page Ordfr in Day NUMBER OF PAGES SENT: 3 (Including Cover) THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATIQN INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE IND)VIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. |F THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPY QF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE, AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. THANK YOU. AUG 23 ’99-13135 919 S57 4553 PAGE. 82 @oo4 9158564168 P.@3/05 08/23/99 MON 13:24 FAX 919 967 4953 FERGUSON STEIN H eu OFFICE ® IP ae sg Me pe SER 0 I rw in IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION FILED No. 4:96-CV-104-BO(3) Ale 2 3.1999 DAVID W. DANIEL, CLERK U8 DISTRICT COURT E. DIST. N. CAROLINA MARTIN CROMARTIE, et al, Plaintiffs, V. JAMES B. HUNT, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, et al, Defendants. and ALFRED SMALLWOOD, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. N t N e N a N a t N a a a d N d N a N p N a N a n a “ u e e t “ e t This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dissolve Stay, Schedule Discovery, and Expedite Trial. Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors join Plaintiffs' Motion. The parties have also filed a Proposed Discovery Plan. Defendants have filed a Withdrawal of Motion to Consolidate this case with Daly v. Leake, No. 4:97-CV-750-BO(3). Proceedings before this Court in this matter have been stayed pending action by the United States Supreme Court, On May 17, 1999, the United States Supreme Court remanded this matter to this Court for trial. See Hunt v, Cromartie, $26 U.S. __ , 119 S.Ct. 1545 (1999). The parties now seek the dissolution of this Court's stay of proceedings in this case, The parties also seek an expedited trial, and have filed a proposed discovery order. This Court's stay in this matter will be dissolved. This matter is set for trial at this Court's November 1, 1999 term, in Raleigh, North Carolina. Discovery in this case will proceed in accordance with the schedule described below. AUG 23 99 13:36 919 SB7 4933 PRGE. 84 08/23/99 MON 13:24 FAX 919 987 4953 FERGUSON STEIN do05 AUG-23-19939 11:54 CLERKS OFFICE » 9198564168 P.84,/@65 - The parties will complete discovery in this matter by October 4, 1999. The parties will be allowed until August 31, 1999, to join additional parties or amend pleadings. Plaintiffs may serve up to fifty interrogatories. Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors may serve up to fifty interrogatories, which shall be apportioned between Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors as they may agree and, absent agreement, divided equally. Plaintiffs may notice up to fifteen depositions of non-expert witnesses, and the Defendants, including Deda iA esis, may notice up to fifteen depositions of non-expert witnesses, which shall be apportioned between Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors as they may agree and, absent agreement, divided equally. The parties must identify expert witnesses and serve their Rule 26 reports on or before September 10, 1999, The parties shall be allowed until September 22, 1999 to make a good faith effort to disclose the identity of all trial witnesses, together with a brief statement of what a party proposes to establish through each witness’ testimony. All motions, except those relating to the admissibility of evidence at trial, are to be filed on or before October 18, 1999. The Court notes and accepts the stipulations agreed to by the parties i their Proposed Discovery Plan. Also, as outlined in the parties’ Proposed Discovery Plan, reasonable access to the public terminal of the North Carolina General Assembly's redistricting computer system will be provided to counsel for Plaintiffs or their experts under the supervision of the Legislative Automated Services Division during regular business hours. Therefore, this Court hereby DISSOLVES its stay of proceedings in this case, SCHEDULES discovery as described above, and sets this case for trial before the undersigned panel during the Court's November 1, 1999 term in Raleigh, North Carolina. The Court will accept Defendants’ Withdrawal of Motion to Consolidate this matter with Daly v. Leake, and will 2 ALG. 23 89 13:36 919 S67 49353 PRGE. B85 08/23/99 MON 13:25 FAX 919 967 4953 FERGUSON STEIN : @oos [SER LR EX dd Om LLeErKRS Uric 9198564160 P.85-85 - - accordingly DENY Defendants’ pending Motion to Consolidate. SO ORDERED. This ___ day of August, 1999, SAM J. ERVIN, II United States Cireuit Judge TERRENCE W. BOYLE Chief United States District Judge RICHARD L. VOORHEES Chief United States District Judge By: ™ Land TERRENCE W. BOYLE CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE TOTAL P.BS ALG 23 ’99 13:35 | 919 957 4953 PAGE. 86 : 4953 FERGUSON STEIN @003 08 7237/99 MON 13 : 24 JAE 919 967 CLERKS UFFICE 919856416@ P.@2/05 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION AUE 2 31199, DA; No. 5:97-CV-750-BO (3) US Dior PANEL, CLR JACK DALY, et al., Plaintiffs, Vv. ORDER LARRY LEAKE (as Chairman of the State Board of Elections), ) ) ) ) ) ) ) et al., ) ) Defendants. The court has pending before it a motion by the defendants to withdraw the motion to consclidate. The court requests the parties to provide the court with a status report of the readiness of this case within ten days from the date of this order. This should include a forecast by the parties of the timing and scope of discovery and other pretrial preparations, the parties' estimate of the time which would be involved in trial, and the parties’ present expectation of a date at which they would be ready for trial, ENTERED at the direction of the court. This 20 day of August, 199s. ~ = Lad An—td TERRENCE W. BOYLE CHIEF UNITED STATES DI¥TRICT JUDGE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA AG 23 ’93 13:36 919 SB? 4933 PAGE. 83