Letter from Judge Craven, Jr. to Counsel of Record RE: Qualifications to Sit as Circuit Court Judge
Public Court Documents
March 11, 1970
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hardbacks. Letter from Judge Craven, Jr. to Counsel of Record RE: Qualifications to Sit as Circuit Court Judge, 1970. 6fe73e37-2e34-f111-88b4-7c1e526962fd. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9ff77172-c4e7-4482-857f-860f6840f48f/letter-from-judge-craven-jr-to-counsel-of-record-re-qualifications-to-sit-as-circuit-court-judge. Accessed June 02, 2026.
Copied!
[||bb91972c-338b-4869-a9b1-1bfa754023ba||] * »
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOURTH JubDIcIAL CIRCUIT
March 11, 1970
CHAMBERS OF
J. BRAXTON CRAVEN, JR.
UNITED AES. GlRcu, JUDGE
P. 0. ———" 491
Asheville, N. C. 2088(
Mr. Benjamin 8. Horack, Ervin, Horack & McCartha, 806
East Trade Street, Charlotte, North Carolina
Mr. William J. Waggoner, Welnstein, Waggoner, Sturges,
Odom & , Bigger, 1100 Barringer Office Tower,
Charlotte, North Car olina
Mr. Conrad 0. Pearson, 203 1/2 East Chapel Hill Street,
Durham, North Carolina
Chambers, Stein, Ferguson & Lanning, 216 West 10th Street,
Charlotte, North Carolina
Messrs. Jack Greenberg, James M. Habrit, III, and Norman
Chackin, 10 Columbug Circle, Rew York, x. ) £
Mr. Brock Barkley, law Bullding, Charlotte, Horth Carolina
Mr. Gaston H. Gage, Grier, Parker, Poe, Thompson, Bernstein,
Gage & Preston, 1014 Law Bullding, Charlotte, North
Carolina
Honorable Robert Morgan, Attorney General of North Carolina,
P. 0. Box 629, Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Mr. Janes H. Carson, Jr., Law Building, Charlotte, North
Carolinas
Mr. William H. Booe, law Building gs Charlotte, Rorth Carolina
Mr. Whiteford 8. Blakeney, North Carolina National Bank
Building, Charlotte, North Carolinas
(Counsel of record in Swann, et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg
Board of Bducation and related or companlon cases)
Gentlemen:
By letter dated March 3, 1970, copy of which is attached,
Mr. Chambers commendably called to ny attention 28 U.S.C.
47. Thus far I have not discovered that the current
gtatute has been interpreted by the Supreme Court, but the
predecessor statute has been sald to mean that the statute
is a nonwaivable bar that prevents a judge from sitting in
the circuit court of appeals on a question which the judge
has tried or heard in the course of the proceedings in the
court below. For your information, I enclose herewith a
copy of & memorandum made for me by my law clerk, David
Moore. 1 have decided to treat Mr. Chambers' letter of
March 3 as & motion addressed to me to conslder whether
or not I am disqualified by the statute from participating [||bb91972c-338b-4869-a9b1-1bfa754023ba||]