Voinovich v. Quilter Appellants' Supplement

Public Court Documents
November 25, 1992

Voinovich v. Quilter Appellants' Supplement preview

George v. Voinovich serving as Governor of the state of Ohio. Barney Quilter serving as Speaker Pro Tempore of the Ohio House of Representative.

Cite this item

  • Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Voinovich v. Quilter Appellants' Supplement, 1992. 74ec9b22-c89a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a0caacbd-6806-4ee6-81bc-7660415e0644/voinovich-v-quilter-appellants-supplement. Accessed May 21, 2025.

    Copied!

    No. 91-1618

In  T he

j&ujjmnr Court of tfyr Hnttrft #tatro
October Term , 1992

George V. V oinovich , Governor of the State of Ohio, et al.,
Appellants,

v.

Barney  Quilter, Speaker Pro Tempore o f  the 
Ohio House of Representatives, et al.,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court 
for the Northern District of Ohio

APPELLANTS’ SUPPLEMENT

Of Counsel:
David L. Shapiro 
1525 Massachusetts Avenue 
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 
(617) 495-4618

N. V ictor Goodman 
Counsel of Record 
James F. DeLeone 
Orla E. Collier III 
Mark D. Tucker 
Benesch, Friedlander, 

Coplan & A iionoff 
88 East Broad Street 
9th Floor
Columbus, Ohio 43215 
(614) 223-9343

W i l s o n  - e p e s  P r i n t i n g  C o . ,  In c . - 7 8 9 - 0 0 9 6  - W a s h i n g t o n . D . C .  2 0 0 0 1



TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

INTRODUCTION .................................. -............ -............  1

APPENDIX: UNOFFICIAL ELECTION RESULTS.. la



In The

Btxpxtm (Emtrt at tty Intfrfr
October Term, 1992

No. 91-1618

George V. V oinovich, Governor of the State of Ohio, et al.,
Appellants,

v .

Barney Quieter, Speaker Pro Tempore of the 
Ohio House of Representatives, et al.,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court 
for the Northern District of Ohio

APPELLANTS’ SUPPLEMENT

INTRODUCTION

This Supplement is filed pursuant to Rule 25.5 of the 
Rules of this Court. The purpose of this Supplement is to 
advise the Court of the election results for races for seats 
in the Ohio General Assembly from the November 3, 1992 
General Election.

The election resulted in an eight seat gain for Re­
publicans, with the Democrats still controlling the House 
by a 53 to 46 margin. All eleven African-American



2
incumbents were successful in their bids for reelection.1 
In addition, a Democrat African-American, Barbara 
Boyd, defeated a white Republican, Charles Byrne, in the 
9th House District. Accordingly, there will be twelve 
African-Americans in the new Ohio House of Representa­
tives.2 * * * * *

With respect to the Ohio Senate, incumbent African- 
American Democrat Ben Espy was elected to fill the 
remainder of the unexpired term for the seat to which he 
was appointed in 1991. He was the only African- 
American candidate for the Ohio Senate in the November 
3, 1992 general election.8 The Democrats gained one seat 
in the Senate.

1 The African-American incumbents, all Democrats, were: C.J. 
Prentiss [HD8], Troy James [HD10], Vermel Whalen [HD12], 
Otto Beatty, Jr. [HD21], Ray Miller [HD22], Helen Rankin [HD30], 
William Mallory [HD31], Rhine McLin [HD38], Tom Roberts 
[HD39], Vernon Sykes [HD44], and Casey Jones [HD49], In 
footnote 14 of their Reply Brief, Appellants erroneously reported 
that Representative Beatty was seeking reelection in House District 
22, and Representative Miller in House District 21. Although these 
are the districts in which these two incumbents were projected to 
run, see App. 187a-188a, Representatives Beatty and Miller actually 
won reeleetion in House Districts 21 and 22, respectively.

The twelve African-American House members, occupying 12.12% 
of the seats in the Ohio House, are slightly above the proportion 
of African-Americans in the state as a whole (roughly 10.65%). 
App. 40a-46a.

2 An African-American Republican, Edward Anderson, was de­
feated by white incumbent Democrat Jane Campbell in the 11th
House District, which has a black voting age population of 40.61%. 
White incumbent Republican Dale Van Vyven defeated white in­
cumbent Democrat Terry Tranter in the 32nd House District, which 
has a black voting age population of 20.76%. African-American 
Republicans Lelia King, Norbert Carson, Samuel Garland, and 
Ray O’Neil, were defeated by African-American incumbent Demo­
crats C.J. Prentiss, Troy James, Vermel Whalen, and Tom Roberts
in the 8th, 10th, 12th, and 39th House Districts, respectively.

8 Senators Johnson and Bowen, who are incumbent African- 
Americans, do not have to run for reelection until 1994.



3

Respectfully submitted,

Of Counsel:
David L. Shapiro
1525 Massachusetts Avenue 
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 
(617) 495-4618

Dated: November 25,1992

N. V ictor Goodman 
Counsel of Record 
James F, DeLeone 
Orla E. Collier III 
Mark D. Tucker 
Benesch, Friedlander, 

Coplan & Aronoff 
88 East Broad Street 
9th Floor
Columbus, Ohio 43215 
(614) 228-9343



APPENDIX



la

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that the attached documents entitled 
“ Unofficial Report of Votes for Ohio Senate” and “Un­
official Report of Votes for Ohio House of Representa­
tives” are documents prepared by the Office of the Secre­
tary of State of Ohio and officially maintained therein. 
These documents contain unofficial totals of votes cast for 
Ohio House and Senate races in the November 3, 1992, 
General Election. Official results will not be certified by 
local boards of election until after the official canvass of 
returns which begins no sooner than November 14, 1992, 
and which is likely to be completed no sooner than early 
December, 1992.

/s /  John F. Bender 
J o h n  F. B ender  
Chief Elections Counsel 
Office of the Secretary of 

State of Ohio



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO SENATE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #02 HARTMAN MONTGOMERY

ERIE ** 9,817 9,470
LUCAS ** 18,463 34,113
OTTAWA 7,621 11,130
WOOD 16,589 32,919

TOTALS 52,490 87,632

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 37.46% 62.54%

DISTRICT #04 LEVEY

BUTLER 82,749
PREBLE 11,912

TOTALS 94,661
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 100.00%

DISTRICT #06 FULLER HORN

MONTGOMERY ** 47,474 102,875
TOTALS 47,474 102,875

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 31.58% 68.42%



DISTRICT #08 ARONOFF PORTUNE
HAMILTON ** 101,106 39,337
TOTALS 101,106 39,337
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 71.99% 28.01%

DISTRICT #10 KEARNS TACKETT
CLARK 82,262 28,465
GREENE 34,826 20,680
MADISON 7,973 4,857
TOTALS 75,061 54,002
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 58.16% 41.84%

DISTRICT #12 CUPP HESS
ALLEN 34,033 11,491
AUGLAIZE ** 8,690 2,941
CHAMPAIGN 8,251 6,594
DARKE 13,876 7,464
MERCER 12,327 4,996
MIAMI ** 6,410 2,706
SHELBY 12,316 5,814
TOTALS 95,903 42,006
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 69.54% 30.46%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO SENATE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #14 HERRON SNYDER
ADAMS 3,492 6,755
BROWN 6,155 8,377
CLERMONT 24,161 35,578
CLINTON 4,819 9,654
FAYETTE 3,194 6,092
HIGHLAND 5,172 9,633
PIKE 5,208 5,189
TOTALS 52,201 81,278
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 39.11% 60.89%
DISTRICT #15 ESPY ROSENBAUM
FRANKLIN ** 71,441 32,633
TOTALS 71,441 32,633
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 68.64% 31.36%
DISTRICT #16 MICHAEL WATTS
FRANKLIN ** 49,909 90,101
PICKAWAY ** 1,541 2,124
TOTALS 51,450 92,225
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 35.81% 64.19%



DISTRICT #18 BOGGS PURATY
ASHTABULA 22,443 18,899
LAKE 44,762 47,096
TOTALS 67,205 65,995
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 50.45% 49.55%
DISTRICT #20 GROFF NEY
ATHENS ** 3,506 2,814
BELMONT 11,065 21,558
COSHOCTON 6,081 8,856
HOLMES 2,087 5,760
MONROE 2,336 4,943
MORGAN 1,909 4,320
MUSKINGUM 12,006 20,200
NOBLE 1,461 4,146
WASHINGTON 9,004 16,463
TOTALS 49,455 89,060
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 35.70% 64.30%
DISTRICT #22 DRAKE FYNN
CUYAHOGA ** 34,562 17,707
MEDINA 36,398 20,052
WAYNE 22,262 17,306
TOTALS 93,222 56,065
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 62.87% 37.13%
** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO SENATE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #24 DUNNING STAKES SUHADOLNIK
CUYAHOGA ** 70,439 8,417 92,427
TOTALS 70,439 8,417 92,427
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 41.12% 4.91% 53.97%

DISTRICT #26 COMBS GILLMOR
CRAWFORD 6,592 12,699
LOGAN 4,792 12,388
MARION 12,041 14,152
SANDUSKY 10,296 15,037
SENECA 10,325 14,514
UNION 8,478 10,015
WYANDOT 3,037 6,742
TOTALS 50,556 85,547
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 37.15% 62.85%
DISTRICT #28 NETTLE SCHMITZ
PORTAGE 35,420 19,773
SUMMIT ** 48,351 19,697
TOTALS 83,771 39,470
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 67.97% 32.03%



DISTRICT #30
COLUMBIANA
GUERNSEY
HARRISON
JEFFERSON
TUSCARAWAS
TOTALS
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES

DISTRICT #32
GEAUGA
TRUMBULL
TOTALS
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES **

BURCH JR
33,990
10,149
6,090

28,724
27,170

106,123
100.00%

HENRY LATELL JR
22,694 9,798
44,070 59,603
66,764 69,401

49.03% 50.97%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #01 THOMPSON
ALLEN 35,585
TOTALS 35,585
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 100.00%
DISTRICT #02 TERWILLEGER TURNER
WARREN 28,902 20,366
TOTALS 28,902 20,366
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 58.66% 41.34%
DISTRICT #03 HORNING LOGAN
COLUMBIANA 16,703 29,106
TOTALS 16,703 29,106
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 36.46% 63.54%
DISTRICT #04 GARDNER SINN
WOOD 33,739 15,498
TOTALS 33,739 15,498
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 68.52% 31.48%



DISTRICT #05 BOGGS JR SCHULTZ

ASHTABULA 23,875 16,564

TOTALS 23,875 16,564

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 59.04% 40.96%

DISTRICT #06 MYERS OSBORN SHONK JR

FAIRFIELD 27,753 2,662 16,234

TOTALS 27,753 2,662 16,234

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 59.49% 5.71% 34.80%

DISTRICT #07 AMSTUTZ VIMMERSTEDT

WAYNE 26,236 13,443

TOTALS 26,236 13,443

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 66.12% 33.88%

DISTRICT #08 KING PRENTISS

CUYAHOGA ** 4,157 27,284

TOTALS 4,157 27,284

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 13.22% 86.78%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #09 BOYD BYRNE

CUYAHOGA ** 29,849 5,914

TOTALS 29,849 5,914

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 83.46% 16.54%

DISTRICT #10 CARSON JAMES

CUYAHOGA ** 3,040 19,881

TOTALS 3,040 19,881

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 13.26% 86,74%

DISTRICT #11 ANDERSON CAMPBELL

CUYAHOGA ** 7,684 32,952

TOTALS 7,684 32,952
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 18.91% 81.09%

DISTRICT #12 GARLAND WHALEN

CUYAHOGA ** 5,129 30,508

TOTALS 5,129 30,508

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 14.39% 85.61%



DISTRICT #13 CLINE JOHANEK NAGIN PRINGLE
CUYAHOGA ** 3,746 7,052 2,062 18,686
TOTALS 3,746 7,052 2,062 18,686
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 11.87% 22.35% 6.54% 59.24%

DISTRICT #14 SUSTER
CUYAHOGA ** 32,517
TOTALS 32,517
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 100.00%

DISTRICT #15 MAHNIC JR WISE
CUYAHOGA ** 
MEDINA **

23,837
2,507

29,889
3,939

TOTALS 26,344 33,828
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 43.78% 56.22%

DISTRICT #16 KASPUTIS SARINGER
CUYAHOGA ** 36,704 20,812
TOTALS 36,704 20,812
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 63.82% 36.18%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT

11a



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #17 CAIN MISENCIK POPOVICH

CUYAHOGA ** 24,322 3,585 9,404
TOTALS 24,322 3,585 9,404
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 65.19% 9.61% 25.20%

DISTRICT #18 COLONNA SIEDEL

CUYAHOGA ** 29,569 22,704

TOTALS 29,569 22,704

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 56.57% 43.43%

DISTRICT #19 REEVES SWEENEY

CUYAHOGA ** 10,017 36,322

TOTALS 10,017 36,322
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 21.62% 78.38%
DISTRICT #20 BARNA MOTTL OBUCH

CUYAHOGA ** 16,042 35,867 2,983

TOTALS 16,042 35,867 2,983
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 29.22% 65.35% 5.43%

12a



DISTRICT #21 BEATTY JR
FRANKLIN ** 25,266
TOTALS 25,266
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 100.00%

DISTRICT #22 JOHNSTON MILLER
FRANKLIN ** 8,873 26,694
TOTALS 8,873 26,694
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 24.95% 75.05%

DISTRICT #23 NEAL JR STINZIANO
FRANKLIN ** 10,951 22,818
TOTALS 10,951 22,818
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 32.43% 67.57%

DISTRICT #24 DAVIDSON PHILLIPS
FRANKLIN ** 30,599 12,791
TOTALS 30,599 12,791
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 70.52% 29.48%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT

13a



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #25 
FRANKLIN **
TOTALS
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES

MASON
25.224
25.224 

53.14%

SHULTZ
22.246
22.246 

46.86%
DISTRICT #26 RYAN TIBERI
FRANKLIN ** 14,326 30,091
TOTALS 14,326 30,091
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 32.25% 67.75%
DISTRICT #27 BRIGGS RYMAN THOMAS JR
FRANKLIN ** 22,883 2,296 27,095
TOTALS 22,883 2,296 27,095
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 43.78% 4.39% 51.83%
DISTRICT #28 
FRANKLIN **
TOTALS
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES

DICUCCIO
14.114
14.114 

30.39%

MEAD
32.322
32.322 

69.61%

14a



DISTRICT #29 SCHUCK SHOEMAKER
FRANKLIN ** 28,218 15,800
PICKAWAY ** 2,619 2,006
TOTALS 30,837 17,806
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 63.39% 36.61%

DISTRICT #30 CARNEY RANKIN
HAMILTON ** 8,640 33,012
TOTALS 8,640 33,012
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 20.74% 79.26%

DISTRICT #31 MALLORY WALKER
HAMILTON ** 21,482 9,905
TOTALS 21,482 9,905
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 68.44% 31.56%

DISTRICT #32 
HAMILTON **
TOTALS
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES

TRANTER
22.034
22.034 

47.01%

VAN VYVEN
24.838
24.838 

52.99%



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #33 BEDINGHAUS LUEBBERS

HAMILTON ** 17,971 20,088

TOTALS 17,971 20,088

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 47.22% 52.78%

DISTRICT #34 ANDERSON WINKLER

HAMILTON ** 14,977 37,293

TOTALS 14,977 37,293

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 28.65% 71.35%

DISTRICT #35 BLESSING JR
HAMILTON ** 36,848

TOTALS 36,848
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 100.00%

DISTRICT #36 SCHULER STIDHAM

HAMILTON ** 35,665 15,391

TOTALS 35,665 15,391

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 69.85% 30.15%

16a



DISTRICT #37 JOHNSON O’BRIEN

HAMILTON ** 15,018 37,916
TOTALS 15,018 37,916
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 28.37% 71.63%

DISTRICT #38 HUSTED MCLIN
MONTGOMERY ** 9,078 26,504
TOTALS 9,078 26,504
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 25.51% 74.49%

DISTRICT #39 O’NEAL ROBERTS
MONTGOMERY ** 9,375 26,321
TOTALS 9,375 26,321
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 26.26% 73.74%

DISTRICT #40 HART JACOBSON
MONTGOMERY ** 22,005 26,505
TOTALS 22,005 26,505
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 45.36% 54.64%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT

17a



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #41 
MONTGOMERY **
TOTALS
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES

BELL
22.309
22.309 

43.80%

MOTTLEY
28.629
28.629 

56.20%

DISTRICT #42 CORBIN SMALLWOOD SMITH
MONTGOMERY ** 27,472 19,439 2,312
TOTALS 27,472 19,439 2,312
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 55.81% 39.49% 4.70%

DISTRICT #43 BROWN NETZLEY
MIAMI ** 12,087 18,991
MONTGOMERY ** 6,957 8,369
TOTALS 19,044 27,360
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 41.04% 58.96%

DISTRICT #44 DENHOLM SYKES
SUMMIT** 8,803 24,513
TOTALS 8,803 24,513
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 26.42% 73.58%

18a



DISTRICT #45 DOTY FINK
SUMMIT ** 29,292 26,743
TOTALS 29,292 26,743
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 52.27% 47.73%

DISTRICT #46 JONES WATKINS
SUMMIT ** 30,314 25,000
TOTALS 30,314 25,000
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 54.80% 45.20%

DISTRICT #47 REED WILLIAMS
SUMMIT ** 11,530 28,205
TOTALS 11,530 28,205
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 29.02% 70.98%

DISTRICT #48 ROMAN SEESE
PORTAGE ** 
SUMMIT **

5,951 7,294 
19,010 21,372

TOTALS 24,961 28,666
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 46.55% 53.45%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #49 JONES PACKARD

LUCAS ** 25,344 5,127

TOTALS 25,344 5,127
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 83.17 % 16.83%

DISTRICT #50 LIPINSKI QUILTER

LUCAS ** 10,969 22,563

TOTALS 10,969 22,563

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 32.71% 67.29%

DISTRICT #51 GREENWOOD SCHWARTZ

LUCAS ** 30,224 15,568

TOTALS 30,224 15,568
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 66.00% 34.00%

DISTRICT #52 CZARCINSKI PERZ

LUCAS ** 21,307 29,301

TOTALS 21,307 29,301
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 42.10% 57.90 %

20a



DISTRICT #53 MYLANDER OPFER

ERIE ** 9,735 11,192
LUCAS ** 3,269 5,881
OTTAWA 6,391 12,868
TOTALS 19,395 29,941
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 39.31% 60.69%
DISTRICT #54 HEALY SCHIFFER
STARK ** 25,878 12,408
TOTALS 25,878 12,408
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 67.59% 32.41%
DISTRICT #55 JOHNSON MILINI
STARK ** 33,532 15,966
TOTALS 33,532 15,966
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 67.74% 32.26%
DISTRICT #56 MAIER MYERS
STARK ** 31,188 17,661
TOTALS 31,188 17,661
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 63.85% 36.15%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT

21a



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT
DISTRICT #57 CARR HOOD
CARROLL 5,671 6,129
MAHONING ** 11,711 10,058
STARK ** 8,161 6,285
TOTALS 25,543 22,472
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 53.20% 46.80%
DISTRICT #58 NEIN STOKER
BUTLER ** 29,384 15,540
TOTALS 29,384 15,540
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 65.41% 34.59%
DISTRICT #59 FOX JOHNSTON
BUTLER ** 29,910 15,285
TOTALS 29,910 15,285
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 66.18% 33.82%
DISTRICT #60 DAY KREBS
BUTLER ** 12,565 12,442
PREBLE 7,640 9,147
TOTALS 20,205 21,589
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 48.34% 51.66%

22a



DISTRICT #61 KOZIURA
LORAIN ** 83,060
TOTALS 33,060
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 100.00%
DISTRICT #62 BAIRD BENDER
LORAIN ** 21,858 27,000
TOTALS 21,858 27,000
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 44.74% 55.26%
DISTRICT #63 RENCH WALSH
ERIE ** 6,012 7,501
HURON ** 11,455 7,249
LORAIN ** 7,102 10,755
TOTALS 24,569 25,505
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 49.07% 50.93%
DISTRICT #64 HAGAN SUBRAMANIAN
MAHONING ** 34,103 5,507
TOTALS 34,103 5,507
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 86.10% 13.90%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT

23a



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #65 GERBERRY MCCABE
MAHONING ** 42,467 13,373
TOTALS 42,467 13,373
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 76.05% 23.95%

DISTRICT #66 PIGOTT SAFFOLD VERICH
TRUMBULL ** 5,369 6,918 31,549
TOTALS 5,369 6,918 31,549
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 12.25% 15.78% 71.97%

DISTRICT #67 LUCAS
TRUMBULL ** 39,634
TOTALS 39,634
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 100.00%

DISTRICT #68 DOLAN GRENDELL
GEAUGA 15,002 19,722
TRUMBULL ** 3,627 3,876
TOTALS 18,629 23,598
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 44.12% 55.88%

24a



DISTRICT #69 
LAKE **
TOTALS
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES

LITTERST
15.522
15.522 

37.16%

SINES
26.246
26.246 

62.84%
DISTRICT #70' SCHULZ TROY
LAKE ** 17,281 28,040
TOTALS 17,281 28,040
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 38.13% 61.87%
DISTRICT #71 BATEMAN JACKSON
CLERMONT ** 31,066 14,127
TOTALS 31,066 14,127
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 68.74% 31.26%
DISTRICT #72 DEAN SNARR VESPER
BROWN 1,668 6,719 6,009
CLERMONT ** 3,019 4,312 6,666
CLINTON 743 7,017 6,906
TOTALS 5,430 18,048 19,581
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 12.61% 41.91% 45.48%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT

25a



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #73 FLACK HARTLEY
CLARK ** 17,083 26,307
TOTALS 17,083 26,307
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 39.37% 60.63%
DISTRICT #74 HAINES SHIRA
CLARK ** 8,226 8,119
GREENE ** 8,175 6,009
MADISON 7,727 4,913
TOTALS 24,128 19,041
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 55.89% 44.11%
DISTRICT #75 JONES MALLCHOK
PORTAGE ** 29,564 15,202
TOTALS 29,564 15,202
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 66.04% 33.96%
DISTRICT #76 REID TATONE
GREENE ** 33,438 8,813
TOTALS 33,438 8,813
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 79.14% 20.86%



DISTRICT #77 GUTHRIE MYERS
LICKING ** 32,319 19,299
TOTALS 32,319 19,299
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 62.61% 37.39%
DISTRICT #78 ABEL SKINNER
ATHENS ** 13,800 3,787
HOCKING 5,852 3,848
LICKING ** 3,088 2,996
PERRY 6,098 6,438
TOTALS 28,838 17,069
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 62.82% 37.18%
DISTRICT #79 JACKSON SAWYER
RICHLAND ** 15,339 30,640
TOTALS 15,339 30,640
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 33.36% 66.64%
DISTRICT #80 LAWRENCE
DELAWARE 27,137
MORROW 8,896
RICHLAND ** 5,199
TOTALS 41,232
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 100.00%
** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT

27a



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #81 BATCHELDER FALLON
MEDINA ** 31,602 17,564
TOTALS 31,602 17,564
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 64.28% 35.72%

DISTRICT #82 GRIFFITH HODGES
DEFIANCE 8,429 7,642
FULTON 5,889 11,846
WILLIAMS 6,710 9,296
TOTALS 21,028 28,784
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 42.21% 57.79%

DISTRICT #83 WACHTMANN WILLIAMS
HENRY 9,178 3,586
PAULDING 5,353 3,505
PUTNAM 11,823 4,236
VAN WERT 9,038 4,505
TOTALS 35,392 15,832
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 69.09% 30.91%

28a



DISTRICT #84 BUCHY KOHLHORST
DARKE 18,869 4,430
MERCER 11,219 5,517
MIAMI ** 6,384 2,628
TOTALS 36,422 12,575
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 74.34% 25.66%

DISTRICT #85 DAVIS HANNA
AUGLAIZE ** 6,879 5,114
CHAMPAIGN 7,026 8,318
SHELBY 9,950 9,202
TOTALS 23,855 22,634
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 51.31% 48.69%

DISTRICT #86 BRADING RAMGE
AUGLAIZE ** 5,877 1,991
HANCOCK 19,278 7,089
HARDIN 7,105 5,106
TOTALS 32,260 14,186
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 69.46% 30.54%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT

29a



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #87 CORE SCHEIDERER
LOGAN 11,269 6,437
MARION** 8,038 6,695
UNION 8,705 4,908
TOTALS 28,012 18,040
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 60.83% 39.17%
DISTRICT #88 RENO WHITE

ADAMS 3,594 6,828
FAYETTE 3,297 6,101
HIGHLAND 5,200 9,485
PIKE 6,842 3,918
TOTALS 18,933 26,332
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 41.83% 58.17%
DISTRICT #89 DAMSCHRODER WISE JR
SANDUSKY 13,222 13,197
SENECA ** 9,465 11,744
TOTALS 22,687 24,941
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 47.63% 52.37 %

30a



DISTRICT #90 O’LEARY WESTON
CRAWFORD 9,784 10,190
MARION ** 3,302 8,262
SENECA ** 1,519 2,765
WYANDOT 2,660 7,427
TOTALS 17,265 28,644
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 37.61% 62.39%

DISTRICT #91 DETWILER SHOEMAKER
PICKAWAY ** 4,467 8,043
ROSS 6,408 18,812
VINTON 1,748 3,006
TOTALS 12,623 29,861
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 29.71% 70.29%

DISTRICT #92 MINCH RIFFE JR
LAWRENCE ** 3,946 9,555
SCIOTO 7,949 24,559
TOTALS 11,895 34,114
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 25.85% 74.15%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT

31a



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #93 BYERS WILLIAMS
ASHLAND 13,250 6,567
HURON ** 2,325 1,789
KNOX 12,333 6,946
TOTALS 27,908 15,302
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 64.59% 35.41%

DISTRICT #94 CREMEANS MALONE
GALLIA 7,040 6,282
JACKSON 5,352 6,860
LAWRENCE ** 5,538 6,502
MEIGS 4,959 4,905
TOTALS 22,889 24,549
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 48.25% 51.75%
DISTRICT #95 HACKENBRACHT MCCULLOUGH PADGETT
COSHOCTON 808 5,743 9,024
HOLMES 307 2,201 5,227
MUSKINGUM ** 723 6,533 11,229
TOTALS 1,838 14,477 25,480
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 4.40% 34.64% 60.96%

32a



DISTRICT #96 JOHNSON PHILLIPS
ATHENS ** 2,449 3,652
MORGAN 4,190 2,105
MUSKINGUM ** 7,655 6,317
WASHINGTON ** 11,007 7,073
TOTALS 25,301 19,147
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 56.92% 43.08%

DISTRICT #97 DIDONATO WILSON
GUERNSEY 8,490 6,824
TUSCARAWAS ** 25,917 6,192
TOTALS 34,407 13,016
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 72.55% 27.45%

DISTRICT #98 KRUPINSKI MOORES
HARRISON 5,460 2,056
JEFFERSON 28,553 8,347
TUSCARAWAS ** 2, 901 1,036
TOTALS 36,914 11,439
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 76.34% 23.66%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT

33a



UNOFFICIAL REPORT OF VOTES FOR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL ELECTION—NOVEMBER 3, 1992

COMPILED BY SECRETARY OF STATE BOB TAFT

DISTRICT #99 CERA DEWEY
BELMONT 24,784 7,639
MONROE 6,029 1,130
NOBLE 3,496 1,845
WASHINGTON ** 3,208 3,300
TOTALS 37,517 13,914
PERCENTAGE OF VOTES 72.95% 27.05%

** DENOTES ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY IS IN THE DISTRICT

34a



. . . . ...

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top