Houston Lawyers' Association Unopposed Motion to Extend Time for Response to Motion to Dismiss and Counterclaim; Proposed Order
Public Court Documents
March 29, 1989
10 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Houston Lawyers' Association Unopposed Motion to Extend Time for Response to Motion to Dismiss and Counterclaim; Proposed Order, 1989. ecda3d38-207c-f011-b4cc-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a15308c7-c21e-43a2-9077-812d4b4be6ac/houston-lawyers-association-unopposed-motion-to-extend-time-for-response-to-motion-to-dismiss-and-counterclaim-proposed-order. Accessed November 06, 2025.
Copied!
Sent Fed Exp 3/29/89
March 29, 1989
Hon. John Neil
Deputy Clerk, U.S. Courthouse
P.O. Box 10708
200 E. Wall, Room 316
Midland, Texas 79702
Re: Civil Action No. MO-88-CA-154
LULAC, et al. v. Jim Mattox, et. al.
Dear Mr. Neil:
Enclosed please find:
3) Plaintiff-intervenor, Houston Lawyers' Association Motion to
Extend Time for Answer to Defendant-intervenor Wood's Motion
to Dismiss and Counterclaim, and
2) Proposed Order.
If you have any questions, please contact my office.
cc: All Attorneys of Record
NE HUDSON STREET . 212) 219-19 . NEW YORK, N.Y. 10013
>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
GE CE CE ED GE CE GD DD GED GED GED GED GE GED GED GED GID GED GED GED GED GED GED GED GED CED GED GED GED GED GED GED GED GED GED GED =D b
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN
CITIZENS (LULAC), et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Houston Lawyers’ Association, Alice
Bonner, Weldon Berry, Francis Williams,
Rev. William Lawson, Deloyd T. Parker,
Bennie McGinty,
Plaintiff-Intervenors,
vs. No. 88-CA-154
JAMES MATTOX, Attorney General of the
State of Texas, et al.,
- Defendants.
DD 5 "0 —" am" —"— —" ew" —m —" — — — — — em — mm — =" —" —" a "=" —" e— — = = — = — — X
PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR HOUSTON LAWYERS’
ASSOCIATION UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND
TIME FOR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR
WOOD'’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND COUNTERCLAIM
Plaintiff-intervenors, Houston Lawyers’ Association, et al.,
without opposition from any Defendant or Defendant-intervenor,
move this court to extend the time for response to Defendant-
intervenor Wood’s Motion to Dismiss atid counterclaim to
Plaintiffs for an additional ten days. Plaintiff-intervenor’s
answer would be due if this motion is granted, on April 20, 1989.
This extension is requested because lead counsel for
Plaintiff-intervenors Houston Lawyers’ Association, is currently
preparing for trial in the case of Chisom v. Roemer, a challenge
to the at large judicial election system in the First Supreme
Court in the Eastern District of Louisiana. Trial in the Chisom
case is scheduled to begin on April 5, 1989.
Of Counsel:
MATTHEWS & BRANSCOMB
A Professional Corporation
Respectfully submitted,
JULIUS L/./CHAMBERS V
SHERRILL A. IFILL
99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
GABRIELLE McDONALD
301 Congress Avenue
Suite 2050
Austin, Texas 78701
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDIAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN
CITIZENS (LULAC), et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Houston Lawyers’ Association, Alice
Bonner, Weldon Berry, Francis Williams,
Rev. William Lawson, Deloyd T. Parker,
Bennie McGinty,
Plaintiff-Intervenors,
vs. . No. 88-CA-154
JAMES MATTOX, Attorney General of the
State of Texas, et al.,
Defendants.
There being no opposition to Plaintiff-intervenor, Houston
Lawyers’ Association, et al., motion to extend the time for
answer to Defendant-intervenor Wood’s Motion to Dismiss and
counterclaim an additional ten days,
IT 18 SO ORDERED.
Signed this day of March, 1989.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I certify that on March 29, 1989, I conferenced by telephone
with the following attorneys for the following parties, and none
had any opposition to the foregoing motion:
Rene Hicks All defendants
Eugene Clements Defendant-Intervenor Judge Sharolyn Wood
David Richards Defendant-Intervenor Travis County
District Judges
Defendant-Intervenor Judge Harold Entz
laid A IL
74 Sherr/lyn A. Ifill
Robert Mow
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that I served the foregoing document on all
attorneys of record by Federal Express mail on this the 29th day
of March, 1989.
Juoihio A HL
i Sherrjyyn A. Ifil¥
March 29, 1989
Hon. John Neil
Deputy Clerk, U.S. Courthouse
P.O, Box 10708
200 E. Wall, Room 316
Midland, Texas 79702
Re: Civil Action No. M0O-88-CA-154
LOLAC, et al. v. Jim Mattox, et. al.
Dear Mr. Neil:
Enclosed please find:
rg Plaintiff-intervenor, Houston Lawyers' Association Motion to
Extend Time for Answer to Defendant-intervenor Wood's Motion
to Dismiss and Counterclaim, and
2) Proposed Order.
If you have any questions, please contact my office.
SAI/dm
encls.
cc: All Attorneys of Record
TREET . 2) 219-19 . NEW YORK, N.Y. 10013
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
GC SED S00 GED CEP SED GUN MEP CSU GEC GHP MIP GID GES SED SER GA GHD ON ED GES EES GND GP EP GED GED GED SUN MED EWS GED GNP GES GES mm xX
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN
CITIZENS (LULAC), at al.,
Plaintiffs,
Houston Lawyers’ Association, Alice
Bonner, Weldon Berry, Francis Williams,
Rev. William Lawson, Deloyd T. Parker,
Bennie McGinty,
Plaintiff-Intervenors,
vs. No. 88-CA-154
JAMES MATTOX, Attorney General of the
State of Texas, et al.,
Defendants.
DD —————" — —— — — —— "5 — — = — — — -— — =D WE Wh w= =D w= w— .— — — = 3
PLAINTIFF=INTERVENOR HOUSTON LAWYERS’
ASSOCIATION UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND
TIME FOR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR
WOOD’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND COUNTERCIAIM
Plaintiff-intervenors, Houston Lawyers’ Association, et al.,
without opposition fens any Defendant or Defendant-intervenor,
move this court to extend the time for response to Defendant-
intervenor Wood’s Motion to Dismiss and counterclaim to
Plaintiffs for an additional ten days. Plaintiff-intervenor’s
answer would be due if this motion is granted, on April 20, 1989.
This extension is requested because lead. counsel for
Plaintiff-intervenors Houston Lawyers’ Association, is currently
preparing for trial in the case of Chisom v. Roemer, a challenge
to the at large judicial election system in the First Supreme
Court in the Eastern District of Louisiana. Trial in the Chisom
case is scheduled to begin on April 5, 1989.
Of Counsel:
MATTHEWS & BRANSCOMB
A Professional Corporation
Respectfully submitted,
JULIUS L/./CHAMBERS V
SHERRIL A. IFILL
99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
GABRIELLE McDONALD
301 Congress Avenue
Suite 2050
Austin, Texas 78701
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION :
CE CED ED ED ED GED CE GED GED GED CED GED GED CED GID GED GED GED GED GED GED GED GN GED GED GED GED GED GED GED GED GED GIO GED GED GED SED CED EEO Xx
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN
CITIZENS (LULAC), et al., -
Plaintiffs,
Houston Lawyers’ Association, Alice
Bonner, Weldon Berry, Francis Williams,
Rev. William Lawson, Deloyd T. Parker,
Bennie McGinty,
Plaintiff-Intervenors,
vs. No. 88-CA-154
JAMES MATTOX, Attorney General of the
State of Texas, et al.,
Defendants.
DD Cm tm —" —" nm —" —" —" — mn em em em a an em em am em es ew en em em em =m mn mm = em =" = a= a= Xx
There being no opposition to Plaintiff-intervenor, Houston
Lawyers’ Association, et al., motion to extend the time for
answer to Defendant-intervenor Wood’s Motion to Dismiss and
counterclaim an additional ten days,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed this : day of March, 1989.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I certify that on March 29, 1989, I conferenced by telephone
with the following attorneys for the following parties, and none
had any opposition to the foregoing motion:
Rene Hicks All defendants
Eugene Clements Defendant-Intervenor Judge Sharolyn Wood
David Richards Defendant-Intervenor Travis County
District Judges
Defendant-Intervenor Judge Harold Entz
lane A HEL
of Sherrylyn A. Ifiil
Robert Mow
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that I served the foregoing document on all
attorneys of record by Federal Express mail on this the 29th day
of March, 1989.
-
Juihio A HLL
vi Sherrf yyn A. Ifi1Y