Letter from Lani Guinier to Anthony Amsterdam RE: Bozeman and Wilder v. Lambert
Correspondence
February 1, 1984

1 page
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Letter from Lani Guinier to Anthony Amsterdam RE: Bozeman and Wilder v. Lambert, 1984. 7e823e81-e692-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a1cb3a1b-cd9f-46c8-a969-a6400ce504d4/letter-from-lani-guinier-to-anthony-amsterdam-re-bozeman-and-wilder-v-lambert. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
Lesar@renseH. February I, 1984 Professor Anthony Amsterdam New York UniversitY Schoo1 of Law 40 Washington Square South Room 327 New York, N. Y. 10012 Re: Bozeman and Wilder v. Lambert Dear Tony: At your suggestion I wrote the judge a letter asking whether we should respond to. the respondents' contentions as raised in their .lanirary IO Reply or when they answer our l,lotion for Sulrunary .fuagment. I received the attached order as my onIY response. At, this point the Wainwright issues have not been briefed on our side. Shou1d we attempt to file something before the March t hearing? P1ease give me a call at your earliest conven- ience to discuss our strateglf for the oral argument. Thanks very much for your kind note and the abundance of assistance you provided. Sincerely, -/ --\r,l . u'..' Lan'i Guinier LG/r Contrib'utions are deductible for U.S. income tar purposes The NAAcp LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUN0 is not part ot the National Association lor the Advancement ol colore.d People although it *.i rornoeo ui ltino snares itJiommitment to equat right!. LDF has had lor over 25 years a separate Board, program, starl, olfice and budget. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 99 Hudson Street, New York, N.Y. 10013o(212) 21$'1900