Case Index

Order Denying Motion to Expedite preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
- Unknown Firm
Matter
- Chishom v. Edwards (Chisom v. Roemer) (Perschall v. State of Louisiana)
Case
- Chisom v. Edwards
U.S. state
- Louisiana, Georgia
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 83fdf3b7-f211-ef11-9f8a-6045bddc4804

Cite this item

Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Case Index, 1969. 6323dfdd-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/caaca5f3-37e6-4f48-839a-0645c4a5cfe2/case-index. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FIFTH CIRCUIT, 

INDEX, 

Volume 

No. 

i Motion for Summary Reversal 

Case No. 28030 ® & 0 0 & 0° © 6 @ ¢ 0 0 OS FO SE 0 8 0 0 0 

Motion to Dismiss and Response to 
Motion for Summary Reversal and 
Brief in Support of Motion to 

Dismiss and Response Thereto ...ceeeees 

Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum 
Brief in Response to Motion for 
Summary Reversal by the Plaintiffs- 

ADDR LINES ve she cr erst ries teeta. 

Response to Motion for Summary 

BVO ST iis st vais ts se tivin ss snes busca, 

Motion of the Quitman Consolidated 
School District, Et Al and the Clarke 
County Board of Education, Et Al to 

DISHISS cet enevennrvsvnivsnrvissnanenn 

Motion to Dismiss (Blackwell a2 - 7 

BNSUIII0 LING) cous snnetoatsinernssinn es 

Motion to Dismiss (Anderson vs. 

Canton Municipal) ® & & & © 6 ® 0° 6 8 @ @ 8 9 SO 0 0 "seo 

Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to 
Motion for Summary Reversal (Anderson 
V8. Canton Municipal) oie eineenvsnonoes 

Response to Motion for Summary 

Reversal (Hudson vs. Leake County) .... 

Letter of Appellant dated June 19, 1969 

Order of District Court to Retain 

Record ® © 8 2 & ¢ ¢ 0 © 8 9 © ® OO ® O ® 6 2 DO Ss OE OG PE O00 

Motion to Consolidate - Granted ........ 

Response to Motion of Individual 
Plaintiffs for Summary Reversal 
(Meridian Mani cipoal) & ... idee cess eacs 

Motion to Consolidate Appeals and 
Motion for Summary Reversal or, 
in the alternative, to place on 
the Summary Hearing Calendar, to 
proceed on original record, and 

to expedite appeals (Case No. 28042) ... 

Document 

No. 

M 

 



  

Volume 

No. 

IX 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

PIFTH CIRCUIT, 

INDEX, 

Telegraphic Request of Appellee 
for Continuance of Oral Argument - 

Denied (Case Nos. 28030 & 28042) ...... 

Response of the Quitman Consolidated 
School District, Et Al and The Clarke 
County Board of Education, Et Al, to 
Motion to Consolidate Appeals, Motion 
for Summary Reversal and for 
Expedited Hearing of this matter 

ON ITS MOT ILS wuss eeveinsvssanensnese 

Additional Memorandum Brief in 
Response to Motion for Summary 
Reversal by the Plaintiffs- 
Appellants and Amicus Curiae-Appellant. 

Response and Brief for Appellees to 
Motion to Consolidate Appeals, 
Motion for Summary Reversal or, in 
the Alternative, to place on the 
Summary Hearing Calendar, to 
proceed on original record, and to 
expedite appeals (Case Nos. 28030 
TUL RE SE AI NGI RPE 

Response and Brief for Appellees , 
Neshoba County School District to 
Motion Filed by United States to 
Consolidate Appeals, Motion for 
Summary Judgment or Reversal, or 
in the alternative to place on 
Summary Hearing Calendar, to Proceed 
on Original Record, and to Expedite 
Appeals (Case Nos.28030 & 28042) ...... 

Brief for United States ; 

Case No. 28042 HE PL LE EE LR FR 

Response of Noxubee County School 

District (Case No. 28042) vovivrsneenee 

Response and Brief on Behalf of 
Appellees, Natchez Special 
Municipal Separate School 

DIStrict, BLA) ceecivsrsisnessveonenss 

Document 

No. 

 



  

Yolunme 

No. 

11 

Page 2 

INDEX 

Plaintiff's~Appellants' 

Memorandum in Reply to 
Defendants—~Appellees Response 
to Motion for Summary Reversal ........ 

Additional Response to Motion 

. for Summary Reversal (Case No. 28030) . 

Response to Motion of United 
States of America for Summary 
Reversal and other relief 
(Hudson ve. Leake COUNTY) .oveevovveses 

Supplement to Memorandum Brief 
filed upon motion for Summary 
Reversal and upon peremptory 

hearing of appeal on the merits 

(Harris vs, Yazoo City municipal) ..... 

Document 

No. 

Ww 

IN
 

 



  

Volume 

No. 

III 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FIFTH CIRCUIT, 

INDEX, 

Supplement to Brief heretofore 
filed June 20 and Compliance 
with directions of the Court 

of June 25 ® & ® 4 & 9 ¢ 0 © & O° 0 8 O° 0 O° 0 0 0° 0 0 0 oe 

Response to Motion for Summary 
Reversal and Brief in Support 
of Motion to Dismiss and Response 
thereto (Harris vs. Yazoo County) 

Response in Opposition to 
Motions and Appeals of Appellants 
(Anderson vs. Canton Municipal) 

Response to Motion of Appellant 

for Summary Reversal (Marion County) 

Response in Opposition to Motion 
to Consolidate Appeal, Motion 
for Summary Reversal or, in the 
alternative, to place on the 
Summary Hearing Calendar, to 
Proceed on original Record, and 
expedite appeals ( Case No. 28042) 

Memorandum Brief of Madison County 
School District in Response to 
Motion for Summary Reversal ........ 

Response to Motion to Consolidate 
Appeals, Motion for Summary 
Reversal, or, in the alternative, 
to place on the summary hearing 
calendar, to proceed on original 
record and to expedite appeals 

(Covington County) ..eecvevneveceres 

Response to Motion of Appellant 
for Summary Reversal (Columbia 

MURIEL UAL) tvnnnescvnnevonnsoss 

Response in Opposition to the 
Motion of the United States to 
Consolidate Appeals, Motion for 
Summary Reversal, or in the. 
alternative, to place on the 
summary hearing calendar, to proceed 
on the original record, and to 
expedite the appeals (Meridian) 

* 

Document 

No. 

AA 

BB 

CC 

DD 

EE 

FF 

GG 

II 

 



  

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FIFTH CIRCUIT, 

INDEX, 

Volume Document 

No. 

IV Response in Opposition to the 
Motion of the United States 
to Consolidate Appeals, Motion 
Summary Reversal, or in the 
alternative, to place on the 
summary hearing calendar, to 
proceed on the original record, 
and to expedite appeals 

in GI DEE Re NE TE SE I so 

Brief for Franklin County 

SChool DIStrict, Bi Al ivi rieersvnis 

Memorandum Response of Appellees 
to Clerk's letter dated June 25, 
1088 (Ilowrence County) cueeeeeeivesioee 

Response in Opposition to Motion 
to consolidate appeals, Motion to 
Summary Reversal or, in the 
alternative, to place on the 
Summary Hearing Calendar, to 
proceed on the original record, and 
to expedite the appeals (Hinds County) 

Response and Brief on Behalf of 
Appellees (North Pike County) .....c.. 

Response and Brief on Behalf of 

Appellees (Anite County ou. iveescnaee 

Response and Brief on Behalf of 
Appellees (Kemper County) i.e eieseesnns 

Response and Brief on Behalf of 

Appellees (Wilkinson County) .....ce.. 

Answer to Motion to Consolidate 
Appeals and Motion for Summary 
Reversal or, in the alternative, 
to place 6n the Summary Calendar, 
to proceed on original record, and 
to expedite appeals (South Pike County) 

Private Plaintiffs'-appellants' 
Memorandum in support of Relief 

Requested in Proposed Order .cecececess 

No. 

JJ 

KK 

LL 

MM 

NN 

C0 

rp 

QQ 

RR 

SS 

 



  

Supplemental Memorandum 
(Lawrence County) 

Minute Entry of July 2, 

Opinion of the Court dated 

® ® 6 ° & & 0° 0 0 0 0 

JUODHMONYT saves cnc vesvnneresinsees 

Petition for Rehearing En Banc 
and for Stay of Proceedings in 
the United States District Court 
for the Southern District of 
Mississippi, 
for Recall of 

® © 0 8 oo 0 4 0 0 0 & oo 

alternative 

Mandate of this 

Order on Letter from Secretary 
of Health, Education and 

Welfare ®@ & 8 & ¢ ® Oo ° 4 & © 0 HD & 6 0s sO 0 0 0 0 0 

Motion of U.S, 

Amgndingi Order of 7/3/89 .ovecicoe 
for an Order 

Opposition to Motion for 
Permission to Withdraw Plans 
Filed by the Department of 
Health, Education and Welfare 

Motion by the Defendants in the 
above styled consolidated cases 
joining in the motion therein 
filed by the Attorney General of 
the United States 
Secretary of Health, 
Welfare 

in behalf of 

Fducation and 

® & & 6 © & 0 9 O° 8 °° 0 0 8 0 5 2 0 

Opinion-Order further amending 
Court's order of 7/3/69 ® © @ oo 2 5 © 0 © » 

Clerk's Certificate ® & & © 5 ¢ 6 ¢ @ © 6 0° 9 0 

Document 

No. 

T™ 

UU 

Vv 

WW 

XX 

YY 

ZZ 

AAA 

CCC’ 

DDD

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Order Denying Motion to Expedite

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in