Motion for Leave to File Motion Seeking Modification of Mandate and Other Exhibits
Public Court Documents
August 21, 1969
8 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Motion for Leave to File Motion Seeking Modification of Mandate and Other Exhibits, 1969. 24b2f81d-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a39c9c29-a7a5-4e9e-bc04-b68a5e7c9dee/motion-for-leave-to-file-motion-seeking-modification-of-mandate-and-other-exhibits. Accessed November 19, 2025.
Copied!
®o Ie
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
JACKSON DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Ve.
HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
et a2l., and RELATED CASES,
Defendants.
N
o
W
r
Ne
A
N
WN
N
d
N
N
MOTION OF THE UNITED
MOTION SEENING MODIFI]
TN ED STATES FOL LEAVE TQ FILE
: I ION OF MANDATE
The United States moves this Court for an order
in the above cases granting leave to file the attached motion
in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
seeking modification of its order of July 3, 1969 as amended,
to permit an extension of time until December 1, 1969 for
the development of terminal desegregation plans by the
respective school boards in collaboration with the
Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
This motior is based upon the information
contained in a letter to this Court from 3ecretary Robert
H. Finch, of the Department of Health, Education and Welfar
dated August 19, 1969, a copy of which is attached.
In view of the fact that the time schedule in these
cases was originally set by the Court of Appeals in iis
July 3, 1969 order, it ill be nzcessary to move that Court
to amend its order in accordance with this motion.
In view of the shortness of time we have filed a Motion
with the Court of Appeals simultaneously with the filing
of this Motion in this Court.
Respectfully submitted,
JERRIS LEONARD
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division
Department of Justice
August 19, 1969
Honorable William Harold Cox
United States District Judge
Jackson, Mississippi 39205
Dear Judge Cox:
In accordance with an order of the United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit experts from the Office of Education in the
Department of Health, Education and Welfare have developed and filed
terminal plans to disestablish the dual school systems in 33
Mississippi school district cases.
These terminal plans were developed, reviewed with the school
districts, and filed with the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Mississippi on August 11, 1969, as required
by the Order of the United States Court of Kopenis for the Fifth
Circuit. These terminal plans were developed under great stress in
approximately three weeks; they are to be ordered for implementation
on August 25, 1969, and ordered to be implemented commencing with the
beginning of the 1969-70 school year. The schools involved are to be
opened for school during a period which begins two days before
August 25, 1969, and all are to be cpen for school not later than
September 3 1969.
On Thursday of last week, I received the terminal plans as developed
and filed by the experts from the Office of Education. I have
personally reviewed each of these plans. This review was conducted
in my capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health, Education
and Welfare and as the Cabinet officer of our government charged with
the ultimate responsibility for the education of the pecple of our
Nation.
In this same capacity, and bearing in mind the great trust reposed in
me, together with the ultimate responsibility for the education of the
people of our nation, I am gravely concerned that the time allowed for
the development of these terminal plans has been much too short for the
educators of the Office of Education to develop terminal plans which
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Nos. 28030 and 238042
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant
HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al.
Defendants-Appellees
(AND CONSOLIDATED CASES)
Appeals fromthe United States District Court
For ‘the Southern District of Mississippi
MOTION IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
The United States moves this Court for an order
amending its order of July 3, 1969 and subsequent amendments
thereto in accordance with the proposed amendment order
attached hereto.
This motion is based upon the following considera-
tions:
By letter dated August 19, 1969 ( a copy of which
is attached) to Honorable William Harold Cox, Chief Judge,
United States District Court for the Southern District
of Mississippi, Secretary Robert H. Finch of the Department
of Health, Education and Welfare feguesiad to be permitted *
additional time dvring which experts of the Office of
Education may go into each school district in these cases
and develop meaningful studies in depth and recommend
terminal desegregation plans to be submitted to the Court
not later than December 1, 1969. Since Secretary Finch
is in the best possible position to judge the need and
capacities in the Office of Education, we respectfully
request that this motion be granted. We have filed
¢ #
a: ®
simultaneously with this motion a motion in the district poe
court for an order granting leave to file this motion
in this Court.
Respectfully submitted,
JERRIS LEONARD
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division
Washington, D.C. 20530
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Nos. 23030 and 28042
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant
HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al.
Defendants-Appellees
(AND CONSOLIDATED CASES)
Appeals from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Mississippi
AMENDED ORDER
The order of this Court dated July 3, 1969, as
amended by Order entered July 25, 1969, is hereby
further amended as follows:
Parszranhs 3,4,3,6, and 7 are deleted and the
following paragraphs will substitute therefor:
3. The Board, in conjunction with the Office
of Education, shall develop and present to
the District Court on or before December 1,
1969, an acceptable plan of desegregation.
4. If the Office of Education and a school board
agree upon a plan of desegregation, it shall
be presented to the District Court on or before
December 1, 1969. The Court shall approve
such plan unless within 15 days after submission
to the Court any party files any objection or
proposed amendment thereto alleging that the
plan, or any part thereof does not conform
to Constitutional standards.
35. If no agreement is reached, the Office of
Education shall present its proposal for a
August
plan for the school district to the
District Court on or before December 1, 1969.
The parties shall have 15 days from the date such
a proposed plan is filed with the District
Court to file objections or suggested amendments
thereto. The District Court shall hold a
hearing on the proposed plan and any objections
and suggested amendments thereto, and shall
promptly approve a plan which shidl conform
to Constitutional standards. The District
Court shall enter Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law regarding the efficacy of
any plan which is approved or ordered to
disestablish the dual school system in question.
Jurisdiction shall be retained until it is
Clear that. disestablishment has been achieved.
, 1969,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Robert T. Moore, an attorney with the Department
of Justice, do hereby certify that I have made service
upon all counsel in these cases who were present on
August 21 at 1:30 p.m. in the courtroom of the United
States District Court pursuant to notice of a hearing
given by this court, by depositing sufficient numbers
0 p
s
of copies of the foregoing motion on defense couns
table in the courtroom. Done this the 21st day of
August 19690.
ROBERT T. MOORE