Correspondence from Caldwell to Chachkin and Dimond
Correspondence
January 21, 1972
1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Correspondence from Caldwell to Chachkin and Dimond, 1972. e61b5180-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a70777f1-6ac9-4a47-b6b7-1b28cf8182aa/correspondence-from-caldwell-to-chachkin-and-dimond. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
P H O N E ( 9 0 1 ) 5 2 5 - 8 6 0 1RATNER, SUGARMON & LUCAS
A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W
S U I T E 5 2 5
C O M M E R C E T I T L E B U I L D I N G
M A R V I N L. R A T N E R
R. B. S U G A R M O N , J R .
L O U I S R. L U C A S
W A L T E R L. B A I L E Y , J R .
I RV I N M. S A L K Y
M I C H A E L B. K A Y
W I L L I A M E . C A L D W E L L
MEMPHIS, T E N N E S S E E 3 8 1 0 3
January 21, 1972 B E N L . H O O K S
OF C O U N S E L
Norman J. Chachkin, Esq.
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019
Paul R. Dimond, Esq.
Center for Law & Education
Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Dear Norman and Paul:
Enclosed please find a draft of our proposed
motion to dismiss the appeals in the Detroit case.
Your prompt criticisms, comments, deletions, additions,
etc., will be greatly appreciated. See Sixth Cir. Rule
8? cf. Alexander v. Holmes County Board.
Very truly yours,
William E. Caldwell
WEC:pw
Enclosure