Correspondence from Caldwell to Chachkin and Dimond
Correspondence
January 21, 1972

1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Correspondence from Caldwell to Chachkin and Dimond, 1972. e61b5180-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a70777f1-6ac9-4a47-b6b7-1b28cf8182aa/correspondence-from-caldwell-to-chachkin-and-dimond. Accessed October 09, 2025.
Copied!
P H O N E ( 9 0 1 ) 5 2 5 - 8 6 0 1RATNER, SUGARMON & LUCAS A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W S U I T E 5 2 5 C O M M E R C E T I T L E B U I L D I N G M A R V I N L. R A T N E R R. B. S U G A R M O N , J R . L O U I S R. L U C A S W A L T E R L. B A I L E Y , J R . I RV I N M. S A L K Y M I C H A E L B. K A Y W I L L I A M E . C A L D W E L L MEMPHIS, T E N N E S S E E 3 8 1 0 3 January 21, 1972 B E N L . H O O K S OF C O U N S E L Norman J. Chachkin, Esq. 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Paul R. Dimond, Esq. Center for Law & Education Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts Dear Norman and Paul: Enclosed please find a draft of our proposed motion to dismiss the appeals in the Detroit case. Your prompt criticisms, comments, deletions, additions, etc., will be greatly appreciated. See Sixth Cir. Rule 8? cf. Alexander v. Holmes County Board. Very truly yours, William E. Caldwell WEC:pw Enclosure