Argument form for Supreme Court

Public Court Documents
March 27, 1991

Argument form for Supreme Court preview

1 page

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Chisom Hardbacks. Argument form for Supreme Court, 1991. e70b6566-f311-ef11-9f89-0022482f7547. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a7745f95-50fd-430c-8ae4-dbd45bda4e86/argument-form-for-supreme-court. Accessed April 10, 2025.

    ARGUMENT FORM • n)F21 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TO: "Counsel of Record" 

Please complete all applicable parts of this form and return immediately to: Sandy Nelsen, Assistant Clerk, Supreme Court of 
the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543. 

A Case No.:  90- 757 Chi &GM, et at .  v. Roemer, et al _  
(Petitioner(s) or Appellant(s)) (Respondent(s) or Appellee(s)) 

Case No.:  90-1032 United States 
(Petitioner(s) or Appellant(s)) 

v. Roemer, et al .  
(Respondent(s) or Appellee(s)) 

Case No.:   v.   
(Petitioner(s) or Appellant(s)) (Respondent(s) or Appellee(s)) 

Date of Argument. Apri I 22, 1991 

Arguing CounseFa me I a S. Karl an  
(must be a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court or must have been allowed to argue pro haz vice by order of this Court.: 

(Preferred Phonetic Pronunciation): 

Title, if any: 

Address. 

Car-Lan 

Not appl i cahl  

mr. Mrs. 

(Solicitor General, Attorney General, City Attorney, etc.) 

Uni versi t y of Vi rgi ni a, School of Law 

Lr-J1 - miss 

City and State.  Charl ot tcsvi I I e, VA zip.  22 901 

Telephone.  804-924-7810 

Were you appointed by this Court? E Yes No Allowed to argue pro hac vice? E Yes 

Name of party(ies) for whom counsel will argue&)na d Chi som, et aI  

No 

Please complete the following only if the Court has granted permission for Divided Argument: 

Name of party(ies) for whom counsel will argue. Uni ted States 

Kennet h W. St a r r  Total Minutes.  20 
(Name of counsel who will argue first) 

Name of party(ies) for whom counsel will argue: 

Pamp I a S_ KA r 1 an 

Ronal d Chi som, et at  

(Name of counsel who will argue second) 
Total Minutes:  

Please indicate names of Other Counsel who are members of the Bar of the Supreme Court that arguing counsel wants to have 

N.' seated at Counsel Table: 

Charl es Stephen Ral ston City / State New York, New York / 

  City / State   

D IT IS IMPORTANT THAT ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION BE SLJBMITTEThTO THIS OFFICE 

DATE  March 27, 1991 SIGNATU 
(Counsel of record) 

16001-7-86

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top