Argument form for Supreme Court

1 page

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Matter
- Chishom v. Edwards (Chisom v. Roemer) (Perschall v. State of Louisiana)
Case
- Chisom v. Roemer
U.S. state
- Louisiana
- Georgia
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- e70b6566-f311-ef11-9f89-0022482f7547

Cite this item

Case Files, Chisom Hardbacks. Argument form for Supreme Court, 1991. e70b6566-f311-ef11-9f89-0022482f7547. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a7745f95-50fd-430c-8ae4-dbd45bda4e86/argument-form-for-supreme-court. Accessed November 23, 2025.

Copied!

    ARGUMENT FORM • n)F21 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TO: "Counsel of Record" 

Please complete all applicable parts of this form and return immediately to: Sandy Nelsen, Assistant Clerk, Supreme Court of 
the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543. 

A Case No.:  90- 757 Chi &GM, et at .  v. Roemer, et al _  
(Petitioner(s) or Appellant(s)) (Respondent(s) or Appellee(s)) 

Case No.:  90-1032 United States 
(Petitioner(s) or Appellant(s)) 

v. Roemer, et al .  
(Respondent(s) or Appellee(s)) 

Case No.:   v.   
(Petitioner(s) or Appellant(s)) (Respondent(s) or Appellee(s)) 

Date of Argument. Apri I 22, 1991 

Arguing CounseFa me I a S. Karl an  
(must be a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court or must have been allowed to argue pro haz vice by order of this Court.: 

(Preferred Phonetic Pronunciation): 

Title, if any: 

Address. 

Car-Lan 

Not appl i cahl  

mr. Mrs. 

(Solicitor General, Attorney General, City Attorney, etc.) 

Uni versi t y of Vi rgi ni a, School of Law 

Lr-J1 - miss 

City and State.  Charl ot tcsvi I I e, VA zip.  22 901 

Telephone.  804-924-7810 

Were you appointed by this Court? E Yes No Allowed to argue pro hac vice? E Yes 

Name of party(ies) for whom counsel will argue&)na d Chi som, et aI  

No 

Please complete the following only if the Court has granted permission for Divided Argument: 

Name of party(ies) for whom counsel will argue. Uni ted States 

Kennet h W. St a r r  Total Minutes.  20 
(Name of counsel who will argue first) 

Name of party(ies) for whom counsel will argue: 

Pamp I a S_ KA r 1 an 

Ronal d Chi som, et at  

(Name of counsel who will argue second) 
Total Minutes:  

Please indicate names of Other Counsel who are members of the Bar of the Supreme Court that arguing counsel wants to have 

N.' seated at Counsel Table: 

Charl es Stephen Ral ston City / State New York, New York / 

  City / State   

D IT IS IMPORTANT THAT ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION BE SLJBMITTEThTO THIS OFFICE 

DATE  March 27, 1991 SIGNATU 
(Counsel of record) 

16001-7-86

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Argument form for Supreme Court

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in