Memo from Clerk to Counsel Re: Court Opinion

1 page

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Topic
- Educational Equity
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organization
- LDF
Matter
- Henry v. Clarksdale Municipal Separate School District
Case
- Henry v. Clarksdale Municipal Separate School District
U.S. state
- Mississippi
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- ac4b2a87-8418-f111-8342-0022482cdbbc

Cite this item

Case Files, Henry v. Clarksdale Hardbacks. Memo from Clerk to Counsel Re: Court Opinion, 1978. ac4b2a87-8418-f111-8342-0022482cdbbc. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/aa27f295-f945-4c21-a289-6a83245e3e69/memo-from-clerk-to-counsel-re-court-opinion. Accessed April 01, 2026.

Copied!

     [||f0d546d9-b6d3-468a-bd50-81c6fe506c61||] @.. States (Court of Appeal ® M1 

FIFTH CIRCUIT 

TEL 504—-589.6514 

EDWARD W. WADSWORTH OFFICE OF THE CLERK 600 CAMP STREET 
CLERK NEW ORLEANS. LA. 70130 

September 7, 1978 

MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW: 

No. 76-1207 - HENRY, ET AL, VS. CLARKSDALE MUNICIPAL 
SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. 

Dear Counsel: 

Enclosed is a copy of the Court's opinion this day rendered in the above 
case, A judgment has this day been entered in accordance therewith 
pursuant to Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

Rules 39, 40 and 41, F.R.A.P., govern costs, petitions for rehearing and 
mandates, respectively. A petition for rehearing must be filed in the 
Clerk's Office within 14 days from this date, Placing the petition in 
the mail on the 14th day will not suffice. 

Local Rule 15 provides that "A motion for a stay of the issuance of a 
mandate in a direct criminal appeal filed under F.R.A.P. Rule 41 shall 
not be granted simply upon request. Unless the petition sets forth good 
cause for stay or clearly demonstrates that a substantial question is to 
be presented to the Supreme Court, the motion shall be denied and the 
mandate thereafter issued forthwith." 

If you are court-appointed counsel, your attention is called to Local 
Rule 7 which provides: "Appointed counsel shall, in the event of 
affirmance or other decision adverse to the party represented, promptly 
advise him in writing of his right to seek further review by the filing 
of a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court, and shall 
file such petition, if requested by such party in writing to do so." 

Very truly yours, 

EDWARD W. WADSWORTH, Clerk 

By \ 
enc, puty er 
cc: Messrs, Melvyn R, Leventhal 

Jack Greenberg 
Mr, Semmes Luckett [||f0d546d9-b6d3-468a-bd50-81c6fe506c61||]

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Memo from Clerk to Counsel Re: Court Opinion

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in