Letter From Court of Appeals RE: 20-Day Notice

Public Court Documents
October 19, 1998

Cite this item
Letter From Court of Appeals RE: 20-Day Notice preview

1 page

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Campaign to Save our Public Hospitals v. Giuliani Hardbacks. Letter From Court of Appeals RE: 20-Day Notice, 1998. 7ad86008-6935-f011-8c4e-0022482c18b0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/abb7e22f-6295-4182-ad02-8f33873dcc96/letter-from-court-of-appeals-re-20-day-notice. Accessed July 26, 2025.

    Copied!

    Ate of Nir York 

Clerk oo Occ 
Llhany, Now York 12207-1095 

  

October 19, 1998 

Elaine R. Jones, Esq. 

NAACP Legal Defense & Education 

Fund,. Inc. 

Attn: Rachel D. Godsil, Esq. 

99 Hudson Street 

New York, NY 10013 

Re: Campaign v Giuliani @ P107ad 

Dear Counselor: 

THIS COMMUNICATION IS YOUR 20 DAY NOTICE PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 500.9(c). FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN THE ENTRY OF 

AN ORDER PRECLUDING RESPONDENT'S BRIEF, WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE, 

TWENTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION. 

, Pursuant to the Court's Rules of Practice, 500.9(c), "If 

the respondent shall not have filed and served the papers 

required by section 500.4 or 500.7 of this Part within the time 

prescribed by these Rules or the date otherwise directed by the 

court, the court will issue to respondent, by regular mail to 

counsel of record, a notice that such service and filing be made 

within 20 days after the date of the notice, unless the court, 

in setting a date certain for filing, has indicated that such 

date is final or that no 20-day notice shall issue. After the 

20-day notice, if any, has been received but prior to the 

expiration of that 20-day period, respondent may, on good cause 

shown, request of the clerk of the court an extengion of the 20- 

day period to a day certain. On failure to comply with the 

terms of the court's direction, original notice or the terms as 

extended by the clerk, an order shall be entered by the clerk 

precluding the right of respondent to submit a brief." 

Very truly yours, 

Hii M. Coho 
Stuart M. Cohen 

cc: Hon. Michael D. Hess ; i

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top