Correspondence from Clerk to Leventhal Re: Motion to Stay

Correspondence
June 23, 1972

Correspondence from Clerk to Leventhal Re: Motion to Stay preview

1 page

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Norwood v. Harrison - Hardbacks. Correspondence from Clerk to Leventhal Re: Motion to Stay, 1972. 23e0c70f-732e-f111-88b4-7c1e527f53b4. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ac02ccde-4670-4eec-95e1-d179acb8f9f3/correspondence-from-clerk-to-leventhal-re-motion-to-stay. Accessed July 18, 2026.

    Copied!

     [||a42bcf15-1c5b-46ee-adf3-cccaea63b00e||] EDWARD W. WADSWORTH NE TLE ROOM 408-400 ROYAL ST. 
CLERK NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130 

SLA | 
o/ La 

20 2, oD 
od J “ Fe £ 

- Delores Norwood, et DPD, Harrison Sr 
’ ’ 

et al 
id 

  

(1) Appellants' Motion to Stay Proceeding on Appeal and 
n Retention of Record in the District Court 

(2) *June 30, 1972 

Dear Sir: 

I am authorized by this Court to advise that the above (1) has been received and filed, 

and under the rules and practice of this Court will be presented for ruling without oral 

argument on the date® shown in column (2) above, together with any response or op- 

position that may be filed by opposing counsel by that date. 

Fy vy 4-we y 

Very truly yours, 

EDWARD W. WADSWORTH, Clerk 

LC, / ” > / f= 

oy ld Th (Dorlectid 
Deputy Clerk 

/amw 

cc: Mr, Jack Cicannaral 
Mr, Robert J, Kelly 
Mr, William A, Allain 

®“Phis_is only the date on which it is now expected that the matter will be forwarded for ruling and does not mean that this 

office will be able to advise counsel of the Court’s action by then. Counsel should allow at least ten days’ time thereafter for 

advice as to the Court's ruling before making inquiry. [||a42bcf15-1c5b-46ee-adf3-cccaea63b00e||] 

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.