Correspondence from Clerk to Leventhal Re: Motion to Stay
Correspondence
June 23, 1972
1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Norwood v. Harrison - Hardbacks. Correspondence from Clerk to Leventhal Re: Motion to Stay, 1972. 23e0c70f-732e-f111-88b4-7c1e527f53b4. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ac02ccde-4670-4eec-95e1-d179acb8f9f3/correspondence-from-clerk-to-leventhal-re-motion-to-stay. Accessed July 18, 2026.
Copied!
[||a42bcf15-1c5b-46ee-adf3-cccaea63b00e||] EDWARD W. WADSWORTH NE TLE ROOM 408-400 ROYAL ST.
CLERK NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130
SLA |
o/ La
20 2, oD
od J “ Fe £
- Delores Norwood, et DPD, Harrison Sr
’ ’
et al
id
(1) Appellants' Motion to Stay Proceeding on Appeal and
n Retention of Record in the District Court
(2) *June 30, 1972
Dear Sir:
I am authorized by this Court to advise that the above (1) has been received and filed,
and under the rules and practice of this Court will be presented for ruling without oral
argument on the date® shown in column (2) above, together with any response or op-
position that may be filed by opposing counsel by that date.
Fy vy 4-we y
Very truly yours,
EDWARD W. WADSWORTH, Clerk
LC, / ” > / f=
oy ld Th (Dorlectid
Deputy Clerk
/amw
cc: Mr, Jack Cicannaral
Mr, Robert J, Kelly
Mr, William A, Allain
®“Phis_is only the date on which it is now expected that the matter will be forwarded for ruling and does not mean that this
office will be able to advise counsel of the Court’s action by then. Counsel should allow at least ten days’ time thereafter for
advice as to the Court's ruling before making inquiry. [||a42bcf15-1c5b-46ee-adf3-cccaea63b00e||]