Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Fourth Request for Production of Documents

4 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Sheff v. O'Neill
Case
- Sheff v. O'Neill
U.S. state
- Connecticut
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 8a61308f-a246-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6

Cite this item

Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Fourth Request for Production of Documents, 1991. 60042677-a446-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f9df265f-e69c-4d0c-8163-8fd1d2e18cc6/defendants-motion-for-extension-of-time-to-respond-to-plaintiffs-fourth-request-for-production-of-documents. Accessed July 29, 2025.

Copied!

    Cv 89-0360977S 

MILO SHEFF, et al SUPERIOR COURT 
J.D. HARTFORD/NEW 

Plaintiffs NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD 

Ve 

WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al 

Defendants APRIL 24, 1991 

DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' FOURTH REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION 

OF DOCUMENTS 

  

  

  

On March 27, 1991 defendants received plaintiffs' Fourth 

Request for Production of documents. In the request plaintiff's 

list thirty-two (32) categories of documents which they are 

seeking. The defendants are in the process of identifying, 

collecting, and copying the responsive material. Because of the 

number of requests for production and the amount of work 

necessary to identify and collect responsive material, the 

defendants are unable to respond to plaintiffs' request within 

the time provided by the Practice Book. 

  

Auth: P.B. § 228(Db) 
NO ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED/NO TESTIMONY REQUIRED 

  

 



  

The purpose of this motion is to seek a one month extension 

of time to respond to plaintiff's fourth request for production 

of documents, giving the defendants until May 28, 1991. This is 

the defendants first request for an extension of time to respond 

to this set of interrogatories. 

On April 23, 1991 defendants' counsel spoke with plaintiffs’ 

counsel (Attorney Stone) and was advised that the plaintiffs do 

not object to the granting of this motion. 

WHEREFORE, the defendants request that the time allotted for 

them to respond to the Plaintiffs' Fourth Request for Production 

be extended until May 28, 1991. 

FOR THE DEFENDANTS 

  

  

Fj n R. Whelan 

Lg Lie a Attorney General 
110 Sherman Street 

Hartford, Connecticut 06105 

Tel phone: 566-3 

Wegyp | (V Lh Li 
  

Diane W. Whitney 
Assistant Attorney Gene & 
110 Sherman Street 
Hartford, Connecticut 06105 

i       
 



      

ORDER 

For good cause shown the foregoing motion is hereby: 

GRANTED/DENIED 

BY THE COURT 
  

HON. HARRY HAMMER 

CERTIFICATION 
  

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed, 

postage prepaid on April 24, 1991 to the following counsel or 

record: 

John Brittain 
University of Connecticut 
School of Law 
65 Elizabeth Street 

Hartford, CT 06105 

Wilfred Rodriguez 
Hispanic Advocacy Project 
Neighborhood Legal Services 
1229 Albany Avenue 
Hartford, CT 06112 

Philip Tegeler 
Martha Stone 
Connecticut Civil Liberties Union 

32 Grand Street 
Hartford, CT 06106 

Wesley W. Horton 
Mollier, Horton & Fineberg, P.C. 
90 Gillett Street 
Hartford, CT 06105 

  
 



      

Jenny Rivera, Esq. 
Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund, Inc. 

99 Hudson Street 
14th Floor 
New York, NY 10013 

Julius L. Chambers 
Marianne Lado, Esq. 
Ronald Ellis, Esq. 
NAACP Legal Defense Fund and 
Educational Fund, Inc. 
99 Hudson Street 
New York, NY 10013 

John A. Powell 

Helen Hershkoff 

American Civil Liberties Union 

132 West 43rd Street 

New York, NY 10036 

AA 

  

  

John R. Whelan 
Agsiscant Attorney General

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Hardback Index #5

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in