Hardback Index #5

    # 

MILO SHEFF, et al. v. WILLIAM A. O'NEILL 
Case # 2207-02 H/B #5 

Contents   

Letter to John Whelan from Philip Tegeler giving ) 
notice as to documents requested for deposition ) 
of Lloyd Calvert scheduled for 9/8/92 and request-) 
ing that a more detailed description of ) 
Mr. Calvert’s anticipated testimony be provided ) 
prior to the deposition ... ) 

8/28/92 Letter to John Whelan from Philip Tegeler giving ) 
notice as to documents requested for deposition of) 
Thomas Breen scheduled for 9/11/92, requesting 
a more detailed description of Mr. Prowda’s 
anticipated testimony be provided prior to 
deposition and enclosing: 

Subpoena Duces Tecum addressed to 
Thomas Breen 

8/28/92 Letter to John Whelan from Philip Tegeler giving ) 
notice as to documents requested for deposition of) 
Peter Prowda scheduled for 9/11/92, requesting a 
more detailed description of Mr. Prowda’s 
anticipated testimony be provided prior to 
deposition and enclosing: 

Subpoena Duces Tecum addressed to 
Peter Prowda 

8/28/92 Defendants’ Motion for Revised Pretrial Order 

8/31/92 Supplementary Exhibits to Defendants’ Motion 
for Revised Pretrial Order 

8/31/92 Letter to Marianne Engelman Lado from John Whelan 
re un-usable replacement copy of the Crain data 
diskette - (Reasons given in enclosed letter from 
David Armor to Lloyd Calvert) - Letter is also an 
attempt by defendants to reach an agreement with 
plaintiffs re adequacy of plaintiffs’ response to 
defendants’ first request for production 

9/2/92 Defendants’ Second Set of Interrogatories and 
Second Request for Production of Documents 

9/2/92 Notice of Filing of Defendants’ Second Set of 
Interrogatories and Second Request for Production  



MILO SHEFF, et al. v. WILLIAM A. O'NEILL 
Case # 2207-02 H/B #5 

  

Date Contents No 
    

9/4/92 Letter to Harry Hammer from John Whelan enclosing ) 
a letter sent to Philip Tegeler abandoning plans ) 
to take depositions of 20 persons (listed by ) 
plaintiffs as expert witnesses or witnesses with ) 
experience and background in education) & giving ) 8 
list as it now stands for the deposition of the ) 
3 new "outside" expert witnesses recently ) 
identified by plaintiffs and date for continua- ) 
tion of the Trent & Allison deposition ....... vias) 

9/11/92 Letter to Philip Tegeler from John Whelan re ) 
inquiries from individuals, from the Hartford ) 
Board of Education, specially retained by ) 
plaintiffs to perform work relevant to trial ) 9 
presentation & requesting that this case be not ) 
discussed with Dr. Margolin in any other context ) 
than a duly noticed AepoSition ceecess essences vsios ) 

Plaintiffs’ Fifth Request for Production of 
DOCUNMBNIES + esse sons orsessnssssenssnssbesnnssvesss 

9/15/92 Plaintiffs’ Sixth Request for Production of ) 
DOCUMENTED vs ves cnnnnenssssnsvonsonsossevse session ) 

10 

Notice of Service of Sixth Request for Production ) 
Of DOCUMBNLS evnvevesinrsssnoissesnnnsvnssoevmesie ) 

9/15/92 Defendants’ Response to the Plaintiffs’ Second ) 
Set Of INterrogatories cis veevessndeccssoesones y 11 

9/15/92 Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Fifth Request ) 
for Production Of DOCUMGNES. css evisvesssseevensss ) 

) 
Notice of Service of Defendants’ Response to the ) 12 

) 
) 

9/16/92 Letter to John R. Whelan from Marianne E. Lado ) 
forwarding attachments requested during 8/25/92 } Al 
deposition of William T. Trent ceeevscececsecees ) 

9/18/92 Letter to John Whelan from Philip D. Tegeler 
giving notice as to documents requested for the 
deposition of Michael Levin; requesting a more 
detailed description of Mr.Levin’s anticipated 
testimony be provided prior to the deposition 
& enclosing Subpoena Duces Tecum for Michael B. 
Levin to appear at a deposition on 10/2/92 ..... 

14 

W
a
r
”
 

N
s
”
 

N
s
”
 

w
t
’
 

w
t
’
 

wi
t’

 
w
a
t
 

 



MILO SHEFF, et al. v. WILLIAM A. O’NEILL 

Case # 2207-02 H/B #5 

  

    Date Contents No 

9/24/92 Letter to Philip Tegeler from John Whelan submit- ) 
ting their revised deposition schedule .......... ) 15 

9/28/92 Letter to Philip Tegeler from John Whelan advising ) 
& naming individuals who will not be listed expert ) 16 
witnesses in the defendants’ 10/4/92 Disclosure of ) 
EXpert WitheSSeS sass sevssssecevinosrvinesvecsseoss ) 

9/29/92 Plaintiffs’ Final List of Non-Expert Witnesses .. ) 
}yi:17 

9/30/92 Notice of Service of Plaintiffs’ Final List of ) 
NON=EXpert WitNoSSeS .c.surrsnrevsneesssnessvces ) 

9/30/92 Letter to John Whelan from Philip D. Tegeler ) 
informing him that Mary Wilson’s name was inadver- ) 
tently omitted from Plaintiffs’ Final List of Non- ) 18 
EXpPOrt WIitNOSSeS wissssssvtassernsinncvssamonesss ) 

10/1/92 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File ) 
Motion tO COMPEL vos ssnvnvssmonsmmsivesomvnsines sis ) 19 

10/5/92 Defendants’ Disclosure of Expert Witnesses ...... 20 

10/5/92 Motion for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice ... 21 

10/7/92 Letter to John Whelan from Philip D. Tegeler 
giving notice as to documents requested for the 22 
10/20/92 deposition of Dr. Theodore Sergi and 
enclosing: 

Subpoena Duces Tecum addressed to 
Dre. Theodore Sergi cssssssssvessssnsnnsesves 

W
a
”
 

N
a
n
”
 

N
s
”
 

w
i
’
 

a
t
’
 

w
a
t
?
 

“
o
u
s
t
 

10/12/92 Letter to John Whalen from Marianne E. Lado in ) 
response to requests for information made by David ) 
Armor in his letter to Lloyd Calvert d/d 8/28/92 as) 
conveyed to plaintiffs by John Whalen’s letter d/d ) 23 
8/31/92 & Defendants’ Second Set of Interrogatories) 
and Second Request for Production of Documents ... ) 

10/14/92 Motion for Extension of Time to File Plaintiffs’ ) 
Responses to Defendants’ Second Set of Interroga- ) 24 
EOTIOS ven venstnsnsnissnnoosnssssmnsesersnenesses ) 

 



  

Date   

10/17/92 

10/26/92 

10/26/92 

10/28/92 

MILO SHEFF, et al. v. WILLIAM A. O’NEILL 

Case # 2207-02 H/B #5 

Contents 
  

Letter to John Whalen from Marianne E. Lado trans-) 
mitting two items namely pages 13-20 of exhibit 1,) 
so identified during the 10/16/92 deposition of ) 
Dr. William Trent & pages 1-12 which remain ) 
identical to the pages already in John Whalen’s ) 
POSSESSION os vnvveinssnsnsinnsnnsinnssmsievsnoeseessos ) 

Defendants’ Objection to Plaintiffs’ Motion to ) 
Compal DiSCOVEYY sess viuneacsnsosns FREI EE NER ) 

Notice of Service of Defendants’ Response to the ) 
Plaintiffs’ Sixth Request for Production of ) 
QOCUMENIES vo vis nse ersrnnssvsnsvarsonsmrnsssnonsnee ) 

Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Sixth Request ) 
for Production Of DOCUMENES uw ee verve cvsovvevncnecs ) 

25 

26 

27 

28