Order: Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant
Public Court Documents
November 9, 1992

2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thompson v. Raiford Hardbacks. Order: Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant, 1992. fcfc98ac-5d40-f011-b4cb-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/afff047a-83ef-48c1-a549-210bb8ffd88b/order-plaintiffs-motion-for-extension-of-time-to-respond-to-defendant. Accessed August 02, 2025.
Copied!
\ : — U.S. DISTRICT COURT | , i 4 » 5-7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS | pr FILED = 0/1 010g | IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC Le: NANCY DOH FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OI 5 By DHERTY, CE 1k ; DALLAS DIVISION Deputy LOIS THOMPSON on behalf of and as next friend to TAYLOR KEONDRA DIXON, ZACHERY X. WILLIAMS, CALVIN A. THOMPSON and PRENTISS LAVELL MULLINS, No. 3-92:CV 1539-R Plaintiffs Civil Action Ve Class Action BURTON F. RAIFORD, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Texas Department of Human Services, and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ¥ % X% XX X% % ¥ % XX % % X X ¥ X % % ¥ * * Defendants. ORDER The Court grants the Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment. The plaintiffs have until November 23, 1992 to file a response. DATED: 9 Mov. G2 Vey ih NO E UNITED Se DISTRIAT “JUDGE DISTRICT OF TEXAS