Order: Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant
Public Court Documents
November 9, 1992
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thompson v. Raiford Hardbacks. Order: Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant, 1992. fcfc98ac-5d40-f011-b4cb-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/afff047a-83ef-48c1-a549-210bb8ffd88b/order-plaintiffs-motion-for-extension-of-time-to-respond-to-defendant. Accessed November 02, 2025.
Copied!
\ : — U.S. DISTRICT COURT | , i 4 » 5-7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS |
pr FILED =
0/1 010g |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC Le: NANCY DOH
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OI 5 By DHERTY, CE 1k
; DALLAS DIVISION Deputy
LOIS THOMPSON on behalf of and
as next friend to TAYLOR
KEONDRA DIXON, ZACHERY X.
WILLIAMS, CALVIN A. THOMPSON
and PRENTISS LAVELL MULLINS,
No. 3-92:CV 1539-R
Plaintiffs Civil Action
Ve Class Action
BURTON F. RAIFORD, in his
capacity as Commissioner of
the Texas Department of Human
Services,
and
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
¥
%
X%
XX
X%
%
¥
%
XX
%
%
X
X
¥
X
%
%
¥
*
*
Defendants.
ORDER
The Court grants the Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of
Time to Respond to Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss or
in the Alternative for Summary Judgment. The plaintiffs have
until November 23, 1992 to file a response.
DATED: 9 Mov. G2
Vey ih
NO E
UNITED Se DISTRIAT “JUDGE
DISTRICT OF TEXAS