Correspondence from Clerk to Leventhal Re: Receipt and Filing
Correspondence
September 27, 1976
1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Norwood v. Harrison - Hardbacks. Correspondence from Clerk to Leventhal Re: Receipt and Filing, 1976. 6086ae91-722e-f111-88b4-000d3a199651. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b0121854-0639-4b7f-b383-c3cf368d876d/correspondence-from-clerk-to-leventhal-re-receipt-and-filing. Accessed July 18, 2026.
Copied!
[||d4837304-ac95-4222-b01b-2217845dea92||] Lirltred States Cmut of Appeals
FIFTH CIRCUIT
EDWARD W. WADSWORTH OFFICE OF THE CLERK 600 CAMP STREET
CLERK NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130
September 27, 1976
Mr. Melvyn R, Leventhal
Attorney at Law
Suite 2030
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019
No. 76-1865 ~ Delores Norwood, etc.,
D., L., Harrison, Sr., Et Al,
(1) Appellees! motion for summary atfirmance, ete.
(2) *October 4, 1976,
Dear Sir:
I am authorized by this Court to advise that the above (1) has been received and filed,
and under the rules and practice of this Court will be presented for ruling without oral
argument on the date* shown in column (2) above, together with any response or op-
position that may be filed by opposing counsel by that date.
Very truly yours,
EDWARD W. WADSWORTH, Clerk
St — —"— Be ct Le cont en me te, wren
Deputy Clerk
Peter M, Stockett, Jr. (w/copy of motion)
* This is only the date on which it is now expected that the matter will be forwarded for ruling and does not mean that this
office will be able to advise counsel of the Court's action by then. Counsel should allow at least ten days’ time thereafter for
advice as to the Court’s ruling before making inquiry.
FPI-MI—7-14.75-3M-4049 [||d4837304-ac95-4222-b01b-2217845dea92||]