Memorandum on Active School Desegregation Cases
Press Release
July 2, 1979
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 7. Memorandum on Active School Desegregation Cases, 1979. 4ad02ba7-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b1069627-4bc5-43b1-95ff-1786c6ce218f/memorandum-on-active-school-desegregation-cases. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jack Greenberg July 2, 1979
James M. Nabrit, III
FROM: Bill Lann Lee
RE: Active School Desegregation Cases
The following are some of the above cases:
A. Elementary and Secondary
1. Estes v. Tasby, Dallas, Texas -- scope of remedy
issues in Supreme Court, cert. granted (MN)
2. U. S. and Overton v. Austin ISD, Austin, Texas --
long overdue remedy in triethnic community (BLL)
3. Northcross v. Bd. of Ed. of Memphis, Memphis, Tenn.
—- modification of desegregation plan (Bill
Caldwell and Richard Fields of Ratner, Sugarmon,
etc.)
4. McPherson v. School Dist. No. 186, I11., Springfield,
Tllinois -- school closings and teacher dismis-
sal issues in the wake of recent comprehensive
settlement (Percy Julian)
.
5. Mims v. Duval County School Bd., Jacksonville,
Florida -- motion for further relief on establish-
ment of magnet schools, school construction and
general ineffectiveness of desegregation plan
(Clyde Murphy)
6. Martin v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Ed.,
Charlotte, N. C. -- action by white plaintiffs
seeking to weaken desegregation plan approved
by court in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg
7. Kelley v. Nashville Bd. of Ed., Nashville, Tennessee
=- issue is general ineffective relief (Avon
Williams)
Re: Active School Desegregation Cases rhe
8. Gaines v. Dougherty County Bd. of BEd., Albany,
Georgia -- inadequate desegregation plan per-
mitting delay of high school desegregation and
excluding elementary schools subject of recent
proceedings in district court, 5th Circuit
appeal filed (CSR, C. B. King)
9. For Louisiana cases, see Napoleon Williams.
B. Post-Secondary Schools
1. Geier v. Blanton, Tennessee higher education
case -- Nashville merger will be subject of
cert. petition (stay denied in June); inade-
quate statewide desegregation efforts need
to be relitigated (BLL)
2. Adams_v. Califano, forever in litigation, e.g.,
challenge to Byrd-Esch amendments, N. C.
higher ed. matters, etc. (JMN)
Conclusion
Several cases may be directly affected by the Dayton
and Columbus decisions because the issues overlap, e.g.,
Austin case, cert. denied. In addition, because these cases
all concern scope of remedy generally, the apparent thrust of
the Dayton and Columbus cases to affirm the affirmative duty
to desegregate will probably have at least an “overwash"
effect in all the above cases, and possibly result in a reassess-
ment of other cases where relief has not been adequate.
B.L.L.
ec: Ann Dowling