Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Prof. Richard L. Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton
Correspondence
March 2, 1988

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Prof. Richard L. Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton, 1988. e4e03a08-ed92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b29ac97a-1cf3-4a6b-bd34-0b10377ba638/correspondence-from-pamela-karlan-to-prof-richard-l-engstrom-re-whitfield-v-clinton. Accessed May 15, 2025.
Copied!
March 2, 1988 Professor RLchard L. Engstrom University of New Orleans Department of Political Science New Orleans, IA 70148 Re: I{tritfield v. Clinton Dear Dick: Here'B a copy of the Democratlc party mles. The rures that seem sarient are 39 and 40, whJ.ch basically punish defections from the party's nominees. In addltion, Irm sendlng you a netrspaper article Lani thought night tie Ln with your testimony on the guestion whether blacks are lLkel.y to become a maJorlty of either the VAp or registered voters any tine soon. (see the bottom of the right corumn on the eecond page). r have census data to back this upwith regard to Phillips County. Finally, could you please bring with you to Helena a copy ofyour most recent CV (the one you gave Tin at the deposition)? If you need to reach me, f shall be in the office until around 11:00 tonorrow. rn the Late afternoon rr11 be in Helena, and reachable through Kathleen (5O1) 338-6482. I look forward to seelng you in Helena. rely, S. Karlan enclosures (2) NINETY NINE HUDSON STREET, 16th FLOOR (212) 219.1900 NEW YORK, N.Y. 10013