Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Prof. Richard L. Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton
Correspondence
March 2, 1988
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Prof. Richard L. Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton, 1988. e4e03a08-ed92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b29ac97a-1cf3-4a6b-bd34-0b10377ba638/correspondence-from-pamela-karlan-to-prof-richard-l-engstrom-re-whitfield-v-clinton. Accessed November 03, 2025.
Copied!
March 2, 1988
Professor RLchard L. Engstrom
University of New Orleans
Department of Political Science
New Orleans, IA 70148
Re: I{tritfield v. Clinton
Dear Dick:
Here'B a copy of the Democratlc party mles. The rures that
seem sarient are 39 and 40, whJ.ch basically punish defections
from the party's nominees.
In addltion, Irm sendlng you a netrspaper article Lani
thought night tie Ln with your testimony on the guestion whether
blacks are lLkel.y to become a maJorlty of either the VAp or
registered voters any tine soon. (see the bottom of the right
corumn on the eecond page). r have census data to back this upwith regard to Phillips County.
Finally, could you please bring with you to Helena a copy ofyour most recent CV (the one you gave Tin at the deposition)?
If you need to reach me, f shall be in the office until
around 11:00 tonorrow. rn the Late afternoon rr11 be in Helena,
and reachable through Kathleen (5O1) 338-6482.
I look forward to seelng you in Helena.
rely,
S. Karlan
enclosures (2)
NINETY NINE HUDSON STREET, 16th FLOOR (212) 219.1900 NEW YORK, N.Y. 10013