Memorandum on Federal Court Hearing in the Case of Eviction of Indigent Mother of 4 and Consequent Denial of Due Process
Press Release
March 17, 1967

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 4. Memorandum on Federal Court Hearing in the Case of Eviction of Indigent Mother of 4 and Consequent Denial of Due Process, 1967. 365c8299-b792-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b2a5d2a8-5788-440d-aa87-a144f29bcfc8/memorandum-on-federal-court-hearing-in-the-case-of-eviction-of-indigent-mother-of-4-and-consequent-denial-of-due-process. Accessed October 09, 2025.
Copied!
To President Hon, Francis E. Rivers PRESS RELEASE Director Counsel egal ’fense und Jack Greenberg NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. i pee Nectar 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8467 FOR RELEASE FRIDAY March 17, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO: Atlanta Reporters FROM: Jesse DeVore, Director of Public Information Be U.S. Federal Court hearing March 17, 1967 in the case of the eviction of an indigent mother of four and consequent denial of due process and equal protection of the law. NATIONAL ANGLE: The same potential abuses exist in the approximately 1400 local housing authorities with low-rent projects across America, WHERE & WHEN: Three-judge U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Friday afternoon, March 17, 1967 (likely to continue on Monday morning}, in Atlanta. ATLANTA---The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) attorneys will represent Miss Josephine Williams, an indigent mother of four, residing in the Perry Homes, a public housing project in Atlanta, Georgia, on Friday in the U.S. District Court here. LDF attorneys Howard Moore and Charles H, Jones, Jr. will maintain that Miss Williams was denied due process and equal protection of the law as a result of the eviction proceedings lodged against her by officials of Perry Homes. They will argue that Miss Williams had no hearing before her evic- tion and that her inability to post a large cash bond before she could defend the eviction in a state court denied her equal protection avail- able to the more affluent. In order to present the involved sequence of events, we cite the following chronologically: 12/8/66: Officials of the Atlanta Housing Authority filed a summary eviction notice against Miss Williams, 12/12/66: LDF attorneys filed a motion to defend Miss Williams in Fulton County Civil Court without posting bond, 2/28/67: Fulton County Civil Court denied LDF motion, 2/28/67: LDF attorneys filed motion for a stay of Miss Williams' eviction in the Fulton County Civil Court. 2/28/67: LDF attorneys filed motion for stay of eviction with the Georgia Supreme Court, 3/4/67: LDF attorneys pre-filed application for stay of eviction with Mr. Justice Black of the U.S. Supreme Court. 3/8/67: Fulton County Civil Court denied LDF motion for a stay of Miss Williams' eviction. 3/8/67: Georgia Supreme Court denied motion for stay of eviction. 3/8/67: Mr. Justice Black denied LDF application for stay of eviction 3/8/67: Mr. Justice Brennan of the U.S. Supreme Court denied LDF application for stay of eviction, 3/9/67: LDF attorneys filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia seeking a temporary restraining order and a complaint for a preliminary and per- manent injunction, 3/9/67: The U.S. District Court granted LDF attorneys a temporary restraining order blocking the eviction of Miss Williams, and set hearing for March 17, 1967, =30- B25