Order

Correspondence from McDonald to Cox and Chachkin preview

2 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Redistricting
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
Case
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- c19fbcb2-e10e-f011-9989-002248226c06

Cite this item

Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Order, 1998. 80f07596-e00e-f011-9989-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a3c674cb-bba7-46bb-9cc2-1b41ff8f726f/order. Accessed July 01, 2025.

Copied!

    FILED 
JUN 92 #998 

DAVID W. DANIEL, CLERK 
U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CIVIL NO. 4:96CV104-BO (3) 

E. DIST. NO. CAR. 
MARTIN CROMARTIE, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. ORDER 

JAMES B. HUNT, JR., in his 

capacity as Governor of the 
State of North Carolina, 
et al., 

Defendants. 

a
 

N
t
”
 

a
 

N
r
 

N
e
 

a
”
 

kt
” 

Y
e
”
 

dt
’ 

an
 

N
t
’
 

a
 

a
 

N
n
’
 

S
t
”
 

  

THIS MATTER is before the Court on "Motion Of Alfred 

Smallwood, David Moore, William M. Hodges, Robert L. Davis, Jr., 

Jan Valder, Barney Offerman, Virginia Newell, Charles Lambeth and 

George Simkins To Intervene" filed November 2&6, 1997 and "Second 

Renewed Motion Of Alfred Smallwood, David Moore, William M. 

Hodges, Robert I,, Davis, Jr., Jan Valder, Barney Offerman, 

Virginia Newell, Charles Lambeth, and George Simkins For Leave To 

Intervene As Defendant" filed May 26, 1998. Defendants in this 

action have filed a response indicating that they do not object 

to the motions. Plaintiffs have not filed a written response. 

Upon review of both motions, the Court finds that the 

prospective intervenors meet the requirements of Rule 24 (a) of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and are therefore entitled 

to intervene as of right in this action. 

80d 81:91 86. 1 33 £9/991.616: Xe 4 117} WI10343 93. ON 

 



  

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the "Motion Of Alfred 

Smallwood, David Moore, William M. Hodges, Robert L. Davis, Jr., 

Jan Valder, Barney Offerman, Virginia Newell, Charles Lambeth and 

George Simkins To Intervene" and "Second Renewed Motion Of Alfred 

Smallwood, David Moore, William M. Hodges, Robert L. Davis, Jr., 

Jan Valder, Barney Offerman, Virginia Newell, Charles Lambeth, 

and George Simkins For Leave To Intervene As Defendant" are 

GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that leave of Court is GRANTED for 

Defendant-Intervenors to file their proposed amended answer. 

Jd 
THIS the 3oT of June, 1598. 

SAM J. ERVIN, III 

United States Circuit Judge 
TERRENCE W. BOYLE 

Chief United States District Judge 
RICHARD I,. VOORHEES 

United States District Judge 

Sw Ld finer J, 
TRRRENCE W. BOYLE { 
Chief United States District Judge 

  

60 'd 81:91" .86: 1 10 £99914616: XE 111 WI3d5 9d MN

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from McDonald to Cox and Chachkin

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in