Order Granting Amicus Leave; Order Denying Motion to Strike; Order Carrying with the Case

Public Court Documents
April 1, 1993

Order Granting Amicus Leave; Order Denying Motion to Strike; Order Carrying with the Case preview

6 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Order Granting Amicus Leave; Order Denying Motion to Strike; Order Carrying with the Case, 1993. e81202e6-1f7c-f011-b4cc-7c1e52467ee8. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b4d3b86f-8e6d-4f6e-892c-acc1ab467f7a/order-granting-amicus-leave-order-denying-motion-to-strike-order-carrying-with-the-case. Accessed November 07, 2025.

    Copied!

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

  

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

  

No. 90-8014 

  

LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN 
CITIZENS, COUNCIL NO. 4434, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

and 

JESSE OLIVER, ET AL., 

Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

versus 

WILLIAM P. CLEMENTS, Etc., ET AL., 

Defendants, 

JIM MATTOX, ET AL., 

Defendants-Appellees-Appellants, 

versus 

JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ, Etc., 
JUDGE SHAROLYN WOOD, Etc., 
and GEORGE S. BAYOUD, JR., Etc., 

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

TOM RICKOFF, SUSAN D. REED, JOHN 

J. SPECIA, JR., SID L. HARLE, SHARON 

MACRAE and MICHAEL P. PEDAN, Bexar 

County, Texas State District Judges, 

Appellants. 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 
Western District of Texas 

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, 
HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, 
BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

  

  

Copy « of ‘this paper to Judges listed below. 

  

— 

Hearing Pane el 
A 

  

a i RS ii : CS 
  

| Hearing Date 
IE AMG S 45D) Foor _Lmby 24, 1993 Writin oie 

kag Judge ii on Filed 

E
S
 

   

  

rn ————————— 

En —————h———————tonei Li] ri re —— ———————— XK CXCEHOT nits; 

 



ORDER 

IT IS ORDERED that the motion of the Attorney General to 

disqualify independent counsel for Thomas R. Phillips, Chief 

Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas and Chairman of the Texas 

Judicial Districts Board is (auld Sil TZ cat - 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of amicus United 

States for leave to file amicus brief in excess of twenty pages 

is Ww Zed - 

SI 4 
HENRY A. POLITZ 

Chief Judge 

  

 



IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

  

No. 90-8014 

  

LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN 

CITIZENS, COUNCIL NO. 4434, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

and 

JESSE OLIVER, ET AL., 
Intervening Plaintiffs-Appelilees, 

versus 

WILLIAM P. CLEMENTS, Etc., ET AL., 
Defendants, 

JIM MATTOX, ET AL., 
Defendants-Appellees-Appellants, 

versus 

JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ, Etc., 
JUDGE SHAROLYN WOOD, Etc., and 
GEORGE S. BAYOUD, JR., Etc., 

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

TOM RICKHOFF, SUSAN D. REED, JOHN J. SPECIA, JR., 

SID L. HARLE, SHARON MACRAE and MICHAEL P. PEDAN, 

Bexar County, Texas State District Judges, 
Appellants. 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 
Western District of Texas 

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, 
HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, 

BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

{ en a 1 inion Fie 

AL GES Writing Juds GID gE  



  

0 

(90-8014) 

ORDER: 

IT IS ORDERED that the motion of defendant-appellant 

Judge Sharolyn Wood to realign the parties, and, if necessary, to 

modify intervention of appellant Wood is cared 4 7H Cri. 

Cage 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant- 

appellant Judge Sharolyn Wood to strike the Attorney General'’s 

"notice of action toward settlement" is AAT J 

hg Sil   

mE Li JUDGE 

 



  

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

  

No. 90-8014 

  

LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN FICHARD E WINDH( 
CITIZENS, COUNCIL NO. 4434, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

and 

JESSE OLIVER, ET AL., 

Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

versus 

WILLIAM P. CLEMENTS, Etc., ET AL., 
Defendants, 

JIM MATTOX, ET AL., 
Defendants-Appellees-Appellants, 

versus 

JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ, Etc., 
JUDGE SHAROLYN WOOD, Etc., and 
GEORGE S. BAYOUD, JR., Etc., 

Defendants-Appellants, 
and 

TOM RICKHOFF, SUSAN D. REED, JOHN J. SPECIA, JR., 

SID L. HARLE, SHARON MACRAE and MICHAEL P. PEDAN, 

Bexar County, Texas State District Judges, 
Appellants. 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 
Western District of Texas 

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, 
HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, 
BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

JRST. 

CLE 

439 its 
it 

ERK 

  

Cory of this paper to Judeoes liste 2d hallow. 

    

Hearing Panel {| Hearing Date 
  

Writing Judge {| Opinion Filed   
AETNE [D&S Eos Ay oe ll23. 

  XCRCATEN EG 

 



  

eo A 

(90-8014) 

BY THE COURT: 

IT IS ORDERED that the motion of defendant-appellant, 

Dallas County District Judge F. Harold Entz, to realign the 

Attorney General of the State of Texas and, if necessary, to 

alter the scope of Judge Entz’s intervention is pared 

wile TH Caer. 
ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

Hoc re 
  

/" HENRY A. POLITZ 
EF JUDGE

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.