Order Denying Petition for Reconsideration

3 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Includes Correspondence from Clerk to All Counsel.

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
Matter
- Milliken v. Bradley
Case
- Milliken v. Bradley
U.S. state
- Michigan
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- bc1c5f55-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0

Cite this item

Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Order Denying Petition for Reconsideration, 1971. bc1c5f55-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b813507f-717b-4722-b2f4-a1b5e10c3a66/order-denying-petition-for-reconsideration. Accessed November 28, 2025.

Copied!

    21,036
OFFICE OF THE CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
CARL W. REUSS

CLERK
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202

January 19, 1971

Ratner, Sugarmon and Lucas 
Memphis, Tennessee

Mr. Nathaniel Jones 
New York, N. Y.
Messrs. Jack Greenberg,

James M. Nabrit, III and 
Norman J. Chachkin 

New York, N. Y.
Mr. Bruce Miller and 

Ms. Lucille Watts 
Detroit, Michigan
Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone 
Detroit, Michigan
Mr. Frank J. Kelley 
Lansing, Michigan
Mr. Robert A. Derengoski 
Lansing, Michigan
Mr. Theodore Sachs 
Detroit, Michigan

Re: Ronald Bradley, et al vs. William J.
Milliken, Governor of the State of 
Michigan, et al - No. 21,036

Gentlemen:
Enclosed is a copy of the Court’s order which

was entered today in the above-entitled case.
Yours very truly

Carl W. Reuss, Clerk



V

No. 21,036
* 4
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

RONALD BRADLEY, ET AL ) JAM 1 9 1971

V .

)
Plaintiffs-Appellants, )

)
) ORDER

CARL W. REUSS, Clerk'

)
WILLIAM G. MILLIKEN, ET AL., )

)
Defendants-Appellees. )

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and 

PECK, Circuit Judges.

Appellants have filed a ‘’petition 'for reconsider

ation” of the order of this Court advancing this case for hear

ing to the February session, passing appellants’ motion to the 

hearing panel, and setting the s/chedule for the filing of 

briefs.

tofore filed in support of their motion as a brief on the 

merits of this case on appeal, they may do so, by advising 

adversary counsel and the clerk of this court to that effect.

If appellants desire to rely upon the brief here-

i



TV'

No. 21,036 - 2

In all other respects, it is ORDERED that the "petition for 

reconsideration" be and hereby is denied.

Entered by order of the Court.

CLEHC

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Order Denying Petition for Reconsideration

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in