Motion for Extension to Disclose Experts Pursuant to P.B. Sec. 220 (D)
Public Court Documents
October 9, 1990

7 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Motion for Extension to Disclose Experts Pursuant to P.B. Sec. 220 (D), 1990. d39ae765-a346-f011-877a-0022482c18b0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b8f0c08d-f925-4986-a27e-d60abb5d2c2a/motion-for-extension-to-disclose-experts-pursuant-to-pb-sec-220-d. Accessed July 29, 2025.
Copied!
/ A } //, f £3 9 7 75 Uf v 1) 7/0 { & / A ~L/ pd "» “/ & 0 L /; ) ) | Pw TH 4 “ng ) yh $) ” 7) //, / | » “a, : 5 // {cv 89-0360977s “ay, / I a MILO SHEFF, et al SUPERIOR COURT Hv. JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD/ NEW BRITIAN AT HARTFORD {WILLIAM O'NEILL | OCTOBER 9, 1990 | MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO D E | OSE EXPERTS | PURSUANT TO P.B. S 20 ( Pursuant to Practice Book Section 220(D) defendants are | required to disclose the names of their experts within 120 days | £rom the date the case is claimed to the trial list. Plaintiffs have previously obtained an extension of time to disclose | experts. The defendants hereby request an extension of time to | disclose their experts for the following reasons: 1. On September 24, 1990 the plaintiffs submitted | interrogatories to the defendants which requested a list of names | i of expert witnesses which the defendants intend to offer. { | Rd : : ; iDefendant 's response to those interrogatories, which is not yet due, will satisfy the disclosure requirements of Practice Book Section 220(D). Allowing the defendants to satisfy the requirements of this section of the practice book by responding NO ORAL ARGUMENT OR TESTIMONY REQUIRED [| lto the plaintiff's interrogatories will eliminate some confusion and duplication of effort. 3. The present case presents an extremely broad challenge to the defendants' practices in regard to the complex field of leducation. Because of the wide range of possible issues upon { ; which the plaintiffs might want to offer expert testimony, the lldefendants will not know what kind of expert testimony they might need to seek until plaintiffs have identified their experts and the subject matter on which these experts will testify in it 'laccordance with interrogatories which have been submitted to the plaintiffs. Since the defendants do not yet know what kind of lexpert testimony they might need it is impossible for them to identify their own experts. ¥ H | 4. Because of the unique nature of this particular piece of 1] i litigation and the special treatment which is being afforded to |the case, the court is able to closely monitor this matter and is i /in a position to conduct a status conference at which agreements can be reached with regard to the scheduling of disclosure of |experts and other matters. Once the plaintiffs have disclosed |their experts, the defendants will be in a better position to || know when it will be possible for them to identify their experts. i | The defendants will at that time request a status conference for ||purposes of establishing deadlines. Counsel for the plaintiffs | thas been contacted and does not object to the granting of this motion. 1 WHEREFORE, the defendants request an extension of time to |] tf |disclose their experts pursuant to Practice Book Section 220(D), giving them until the date to be set by the court for providing that information. HE DEFENDANTS Agsistant Attorney General 710 Sherman Street /Hartford, CT 06105 " Telephone: 566-3696 ORDER For good cause shown the foregoing motion is hereby: GRANTED/DENIED I By the Court CERTIFICATION | This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed postage | O | prepaid to the following counsel of record on October r- 1990: {John Brittain, Esq. |lUniversity of Connecticut School of Law |65 Elizabeth Street Hartford, CT 06105 Wilfred Rodriguez, Esq Hispanic Advocacy Project | Neighborhood Legal Services | 11229 Albany Avenue iHart ford, CT 06112 {Philip Tegeler, Esq. {Martha Stone, Esq. '|Connecticut Civil Liberties Union 132 Grand Street |Hartford, CT 06106 {Wesley W. Horton, Esq. Mollier, Horton & Fineberg, P.C. 90 Gillett Street (Hartford, CT 06105 i 1 (Jenny Rivera, Esq. '|Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund, Inc. |99 Hudson Street 14th Floor New York, NY 10013 i { { |Johi R. Whelan i stant Attorney General / [Julius L. Chambers, Esq {Marianne Lado, Esq. Ronald Ellis, Esq. NAACP Legal Defense Fund and Educational Fund, Inc. 99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 John A. Powell, Esq. Helen Hershkoff, Esq. Adam S. Cohen, Esq. American Civil Liberties Union 132 West 43rd Street New /York, NY nr 1/4 V John ie (NF Ebnnecticut ATTORNEY GENERAL MacKENZIE HALL 110 SHERMAN STREET HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06105 Julius L. Chambers, Esq. Marianne Lado, Esq. NAACP Legal Defense Fund and Educational rund ne EERE a pa 99 Hudson St. a New York, NY 10013 po : é f 4