Motion for Extension to Disclose Experts Pursuant to P.B. Sec. 220 (D)

Public Court Documents
October 9, 1990

Motion for Extension to Disclose Experts Pursuant to P.B. Sec. 220 (D) preview

7 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Motion for Extension to Disclose Experts Pursuant to P.B. Sec. 220 (D), 1990. d39ae765-a346-f011-877a-0022482c18b0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b8f0c08d-f925-4986-a27e-d60abb5d2c2a/motion-for-extension-to-disclose-experts-pursuant-to-pb-sec-220-d. Accessed July 29, 2025.

    Copied!

    / A 

} 
//, f £3 9 7 75 

Uf v 1) 7/0 
{ & / A ~L/ pd 

"» “/ & 0 L /; ) ) 
| Pw TH 4 “ng ) yh $) ” 7) //, / 

| » “a, : 5 // 

{cv 89-0360977s “ay, / 
I a 
MILO SHEFF, et al SUPERIOR COURT 

Hv. JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD/ 
NEW BRITIAN AT HARTFORD 

{WILLIAM O'NEILL 
| OCTOBER 9, 1990 

  

| MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO D 

E 

| 
OSE EXPERTS 

| PURSUANT TO P.B. S 20 ( 
    

Pursuant to Practice Book Section 220(D) defendants are 

| required to disclose the names of their experts within 120 days 

| £rom the date the case is claimed to the trial list. Plaintiffs 

have previously obtained an extension of time to disclose 

| experts. The defendants hereby request an extension of time to 

| disclose their experts for the following reasons: 

1. On September 24, 1990 the plaintiffs submitted 

  | interrogatories to the defendants which requested a list of names 

| 
i of expert witnesses which the defendants intend to offer. 

{ 

| 

Rd : : ; 
iDefendant 's response to those interrogatories, which is not yet 

due, will satisfy the disclosure requirements of Practice Book 

Section 220(D). Allowing the defendants to satisfy the 

requirements of this section of the practice book by responding 

NO ORAL ARGUMENT OR TESTIMONY REQUIRED   

 



  

    
[| 

lto the plaintiff's interrogatories will eliminate some confusion 

and duplication of effort. 

3. The present case presents an extremely broad challenge   
to the defendants' practices in regard to the complex field of 

leducation. Because of the wide range of possible issues upon 
{ 
; 

which the plaintiffs might want to offer expert testimony, the 

lldefendants will not know what kind of expert testimony they might 

need to seek until plaintiffs have identified their experts and 

the subject matter on which these experts will testify in 

it 

'laccordance with interrogatories which have been submitted to the 

plaintiffs. Since the defendants do not yet know what kind of   lexpert testimony they might need it is impossible for them to 

identify their own experts. 

¥ 
H 

| 4. Because of the unique nature of this particular piece of 
1] i 

litigation and the special treatment which is being afforded to 

|the case, the court is able to closely monitor this matter and is 

i 

/in a position to conduct a status conference at which agreements 

can be reached with regard to the scheduling of disclosure of 

|experts and other matters. Once the plaintiffs have disclosed 

|their experts, the defendants will be in a better position to 

|| know when it will be possible for them to identify their experts.   

  
 



  

i 
| 
The defendants will at that time request a status conference for 

||purposes of establishing deadlines. Counsel for the plaintiffs 

| 
thas been contacted and does not object to the granting of this 

motion. 

1 

WHEREFORE, the defendants request an extension of time to 
|] 
tf 

|disclose their experts pursuant to Practice Book Section 220(D), 

giving them until the date to be set by the court for providing 

that information. 

HE DEFENDANTS 

  

  

Agsistant Attorney General 
710 Sherman Street 

/Hartford, CT 06105 
" Telephone: 566-3696 

ORDER 

For good cause shown the foregoing motion is hereby: 

GRANTED/DENIED 

  

I By the Court 

 



  

CERTIFICATION   

| This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed postage | 

O 
| prepaid to the following counsel of record on October r- 1990: 

{John Brittain, Esq. 
|lUniversity of Connecticut 
School of Law 

|65 Elizabeth Street 
Hartford, CT 06105 

Wilfred Rodriguez, Esq 
Hispanic Advocacy Project | 
Neighborhood Legal Services | 
11229 Albany Avenue 
iHart ford, CT 06112   
{Philip Tegeler, Esq. 
{Martha Stone, Esq. 
'|Connecticut Civil Liberties Union 
132 Grand Street 
|Hartford, CT 06106 

{Wesley W. Horton, Esq. 
Mollier, Horton & Fineberg, P.C. 
90 Gillett Street 

(Hartford, CT 06105 
i 1 

  
(Jenny Rivera, Esq. 
'|Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund, Inc. 
|99 Hudson Street 
14th Floor 
New York, NY 10013 

  
  
 



  

    

  

  
i 
{ 

{ 

|Johi R. Whelan 
i stant Attorney General 

/ 

[Julius L. Chambers, Esq 
{Marianne Lado, Esq. 

Ronald Ellis, Esq. 
NAACP Legal Defense Fund and 
Educational Fund, Inc. 
99 Hudson Street 
New York, NY 10013 

John A. Powell, Esq. 
Helen Hershkoff, Esq. 
Adam S. Cohen, Esq. 
American Civil Liberties Union 
132 West 43rd Street 
New /York, NY nr 

1/4 
  

V 

 



John ie (NF Ebnnecticut 
ATTORNEY GENERAL 

MacKENZIE HALL 

110 SHERMAN STREET 

HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06105 

Julius L. Chambers, Esq. 
Marianne Lado, Esq. 
NAACP Legal Defense Fund and Educational rund ne 

EERE a pa 99 Hudson St. a 

New York, NY 10013 po : 
é f 

4

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top