Order Transferring Lauderdale County Case
Public Court Documents
March 20, 1974
7 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Order Transferring Lauderdale County Case, 1974. 83e8542a-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b995b8cf-7a3c-4fc0-9c2c-55c05be43d31/order-transferring-lauderdale-county-case. Accessed November 19, 2025.
Copied!
he yo
a MN 0)
N £..
20 Of
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
COURT 7 APPEALS
10) oar
Fila
Ha i JAR LU 71 Y
EDY, f ~ f ty el 2 ™ nN -~ {AR 0 ror hi ( Ry U RTH
VLONAN
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Vv.
HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,
BUFORD
Vv.
UNITED
Vv.
MILTON
UNITED
Vv.
KEMPER
UNITED
Vv.
A LEE,
STATES
EVANS,
STATES
COUNTY
STATES
ET AL.,
(Civil Action No.
ET AL.,
OF AMERICA,
(Civil Action No.
OF AMERICA,
SCHOOL BOARD, ET AL.,
(Civil Action No.
OF AMERICA,
NORTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED
SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AlL.,
(Civil Action No.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Vv.
NATCHEZ SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL.,
(Civil Action No.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Vv.
MARION COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
(Civil Action No.
ET AL.,
Plaintiff-Appellant
Defendants~-Appellees
4075(J) )
Plaintiffs=Appellees
Defendant-Appellant
Third-Party Defendant-
Appellee
2034 (H) )
Plaintiff-Appellant
Defendants-Appellees
1373(E) )
Plaintiff-Appellant
Defendants-Appellees
3807(J) )
Plaintiff-Appellant
Defendants-Appellees
1120(W) )
Plaintiff-Appellant
Defendants-Appellees
2178 (H) )
i
AO
E
GE
TP
E
U
EO
E
ASR
2
X
5
G
C
h
a
JOAN ANDERSON, ET AL.,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Vv.
Plaintiffs~-Appellants
.Plaintiff-Intervenor-
Appellant
THE CANTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT,
ET AL., AND THE MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL
DISTRICT, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees
(Civil Action No. 3700(J) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Vv.
- SOUTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED
SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL.,
(Civil Action No.
BEATRICE ALEXANDER, ET AL.,
Vv.
HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
ET AL.,
(Civil Action No.
ROY LEE HARRIS, ET AL.,
V.
THE YAZOO COUNTY BOARD OF
EDUCATION, ET AL.,
(Civil Action No.
JOHN BARNHARDT, ET AL.
Vv.
MERIDIAN SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT,
ET AL.,
(Civil Action No.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
V.
NESHOBA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
ET AL.,
(Civil Action No.
Plaintiff-Appellant
Defendants-Appellees
3984 (J) )
Plaintiffs-Appellants
Defendants-Appellees
377943)
Plaintiffs-Appellants
Defendants-Appellees
1209(wW) )
Plaintiffs-Appellants
Defendants-Appellees
1300(E) )
Plaintiff-Appellant
Defendants-Appellees
1396 (E) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant
Vv.
NOXUBEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, :
ET AL., Defendants-Appellees
(Civil Action No. 1372(E) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant
Vv.
LAUDERDALE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
ET AL., Defendants-Appellees
(Civil Action No. 1367(E) )
DIAN HUDSON, ET AL Plaintiffs-Appellants
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Intervenor-
Appellant
V.
LEAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, ET AL Defendants-Appellees
(Civil Action No. 3382(J) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant
Vv.
COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE
SCHOOL, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees
(Civil Action No. 2199(H) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant
Ve.
AMITE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL Defendants-Appellees
(Civil Action No. 3983(J) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant
Vv.
COVINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
ET AL., Defendants~-Appellees
(Civil Action No. 2148(H) )
Ch
Se
I
R
R
0 N
e
ME
ERP
RI
3 L
Y
E
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant
Vv.
LAWRENCE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
ET AL., : Defendants-Appellees
(Civil Action No. 2216(H) )
JEREMIAH BLACKWELL, JR. ET AL PlaintiffsAppellants
Vv.
ISSAQUENA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
ET AL., Defendants-Appellees
(Civil Action No. 1096(W) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant
Vv.
WILKINSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
ET AL., Defendants-Appellees
(Civil Action No. 1160(W) )
CHARLES KILLINGSWORTH, ET AL., Pilaintiffs-Appellants
Vv.
THE ENTERPRISE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL
DISTRICT AND QUITMAN CONSOLIDATED
SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendants~Appellees
(Civil Action No. 1302(E) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant
V.
LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
ET AL., Defendants-Appellees
(Civil Action No. 4292(J) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant
Vv.
PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE
SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees
(Civil Action No. 1368 (E) )
p
o
N
I
T
5
0
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant
V.
FRANKLIN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
ET AL., Defendants-Appellees
(Civil Action No. 4256(J) )
Nos. 28030, 28042
O RDER
Pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court in
Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 1969, 396 U.S. 19,
90 s.Ct. 29, 24 L.Ed.2d4 19, this Court has retained jurisdiction
of the within captioned school cases pending the desegregation
of each system.
Subsequent to this decision of the Supreme Court, the
following orders were entered by this Court with respect to
Lauderdale County School District:
(1) United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir.,
November 7, 1969, 423 F.2d 1264 (Lauderdale County School
District);
(2) United States of America v. Lauderdale County
School District, dated November 19, 1969.
Meanwhile the semi-annual status reports required by
our decision in United States v. Hinds County School Board,
5 ¢ir., 1970, 433 F.24 611, 618-19, have been filed thtobah
and including October 15, 1973,
It now appearing that the Lauderdale County School
District school system has been and is being maintained
as a unitary school system in compliance with the aforesaid
orders, and it further appearing that it would be appropriate
to transfer jurisdiction of the case to the district court
under a final order there to be entered as follows, it is
ORDERED:
(1) Jurisdiction of Civil Action No. 1367(E), United
States of America, Plaintiff, v. Lauderdale County School
District, et al., Defendants, is hereby transferred to the
United States District Court for the Southern District of
Mississippi; :
(2) Said case may be placed on the inactive docket of
that court subject to being reopened for good cause shown
on the application of any party, or intervenor, or sua
sponte;
(3) The aforesaid orders entered by this Court shall
be considered as the mandate of this Court and are to be
made the order of the district court;
(4) The reports required by United States v. Hinds
County School Board, 433 F.2d 618-19, supra, may be dis-
continued in the event copies of the Summary Reports (Forms
101 and 102) which are filed annually with the Department of
Health, Education and Welfare, along with a report showing
faculty and staff assignments as required in the Hinds County
type of report and faculty and staff hiring by race if such
information is not reflected in the HEW Summary Reports, are
filed simultaneously with the district court and served upon
counsel for plaintiffs and amicus curiae, and are retained for
a period of two years by the district court for examination
by counsel for the parties herein or amicus curiae. As an
alternative to filing the HEW reports, the defendant school
districts may continue to file the Hinds County type of report
but on an annual basis mt later than November 15 to reflect
ZH
status as of October 15 each year.
IT IS SO ORDERED this _20th day of March, 1974,
UNITED STATE Fo JUDGE
Cn
UNITED id CIRCUIT JUDGE
wg !
> py 7] rll ; A 77
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
i Hl /
By: cred fel
LAUDERDALE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
EN ’
1]
(er ¢ ( {ttn SA a, yr I Km Dy
|
William Bo ptr
cf counsel
ae