Pleading Index #2

1 page

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Economic Justice
Topic
- Healthcare
LDF Attorneys
- Bill Lann Lee
- Kirsten Levingston
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Thompson v. Raiford
Case
- Thompson v. Raiford
U.S. state
- California
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- e50414b6-5c40-f011-b4cb-7c1e5267c7b6

Cite this item

Case Files, Thompson v. Raiford Hardbacks. Pleading Index #2, 1992. e50414b6-5c40-f011-b4cb-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b9af15e0-2302-4a3c-a26a-9ef3ee52b134/pleading-index-2. Accessed June 17, 2025.

Copied!

    » $ 

BURTON R. RATFORD, 
3-92 CV 1539-R 

LOIS THOMPSON v. 
USDC CASE NO. 

et al., 

11/20/92 

11/20/92 

11/20/92 

11/20/92 

11/23/92 

11/23/92 

11/23/92 

11/23/92 

11/23/92 

11/23/92 

11/23/92 

PLEADING INDEX NO. 2 

DEFENDANT***DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S 
OPPOSITION TO PUEBLO, ABC, NYCCELP AND INDIVIDUAL 
PROPOSED PLAINTIFF-INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO INTERVENE 
AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT 

DEFENDANT * **ORDER SUPPORTING DEFENDANT 
STATES OF AMERICA’S OPPOSITION TO PUEBLO, ABC, 
NYCCELP AND INDIVIDUAL PROPOSED PLAINTIFF- 
INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO INTERVENE AND MEMORANDUM IN 
SUPPORT 

UNITED 

DEFENDANT***DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S 
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT AND 
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT 

DEFENDANT***ORDER SUPPORTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED 
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT AND 
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT 

COURT***GRANTED ORDER SUPPORTING DEFENDANT UNITED 
STATES OF AMERICA’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 
EXCEED PAGE LIMIT 

PLAINTIFFS’ ***PLAINTIFFS’ 
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

RESPONSE TO USA’S MOTION 

PLAINTIFFS’ ***MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ 
RESPONSE AND IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT USA’S 
MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY 
JUDGMENT 

PLAINTIFFS***DECLARATION OF LAURA B. BESHARA IN 
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT USA’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR 
IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

PLAINTIFFS***DECLARATION OF DR. MICHAEL J. NICAR 

DEFENDANT *** DEFENDANT 
OPPOSITION TO 
CERTIFICATION 

RAIFORD’S 
PLAINTIFFS’ 

RESPONSE IN 
MOTION FOR CLASS 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 
CLASS CERTIFICATION 

MOTION FOR 

GO TO PLEADING INDEX #3

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Pleading Index #2

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in