Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Prof. Richard L. Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton
Correspondence
February 16, 1988

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Prof. Richard L. Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton, 1988. 02194712-ec92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b9bc7b22-459a-45f0-a5a9-0e96d82e2b1e/correspondence-from-pamela-karlan-to-prof-richard-l-engstrom-re-whitfield-v-clinton. Accessed July 19, 2025.
Copied!
February 16, 1988 Profeseor Richard L. Engstrom Department of Political Science University of New Orleans Lakefront New Orleans, LA 70148 Bv Federal Exoress Re: Whitfield v. Clinton Dear Dick: Here are the various things f pronised you: (1) the election returns from Phillips County for the LuIa Tyler race (House Dist. 731 . Note that she ran only in certain precincts (2t the district court opinion in MaIIory v. Eyrich (Hanilton County judges). Ir11 send you the Gth Circuit opinion when we get it (3) the Alexander article on run-off primaries (4') the Carrollton opinion (one-man county conmission) (5) ny ABA Journal review of Thernstrom (to whet your appetite) (5) a draft of your affidavit (frll attach the census and cv stuff up here) P1ease call in your changes anytine Wednesday on the affidavit. If they're not major, you can also sign the last page and send it back to us Fed Ex on our account. (Please note in the reference section ltWhitfield O804-O1tt, so our billing will be kept straight) I'I1 taLk to you tomorrow. Sffc-fre1y, ,Y* ". Karran enclosures (6)