Velasquez v. City of Abilene Court Opinion

Unannotated Secondary Research
March 2, 1984

Cite this item
Velasquez v. City of Abilene Court Opinion preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Correspondence from Spaniol to Thornburg; Supreme Court of the United States Court Order, 1986. f95d6abf-d692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/fd794846-c50d-4c84-995e-8b73ef0f851a/correspondence-from-spaniol-to-thornburg-supreme-court-of-the-united-states-court-order. Accessed May 22, 2025.

    Copied!

    OFFICE OF THE CLERK
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

WASHINGTON, D. C. 2.U.543

August I2. .l986

Hon. Lacy H. Thornburg
Attorny General of North Carolina
2 East Morgan Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602

Re: Lacy f,. Thornburg, et al. v. Ralph Gingles,
et aI., No. 83-1968

Dear Mr. Thornburg:

A certified copy of the judgment of this Court inthe above-entltred case been nailed today to the clerk of the
United StateE DLstrict Court for the Eastern Dlstrict of North
CaroLlna.

The total costs in this Court are as follows:

$13 r 317.39
300. o0

Ee1?.gs

i /'r7"
p

a

Printing of record:
Clerkrs cogts:
TOTAL c

The appellants are glven recovery for four-fifthsof the totar costs in thls court which amounts to $101993.88.This amount may be collected through the United Statei DistrictCourt for the Eastern District or direct from opposing counsel orparties.

Very truly yours,

JOSEPH F. SPANIOL, JR., Clerk

By:

Theresa A. Haslip
Assistant, Clerk

Enc.
cc: Hon. Charles Fried

Jullus L. Chambers, Esg.



$upreme @ourt of tlle @nite! btateg

83,1968

No.

Lacy H. Thornburg, et al .,

Appel I ants, .

v.

Ralph Gingles, et al.

APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina.

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from

the above court and was argued by counsel.

0N CONSIDERATI0I| l$lERE0F, it is ordered and adjudged by this

Court that the judgment of the above court in this cause is affirmed in part

and reversed 'in part, with four-fifths of the total costs to be taxed against

the appellees there'in, and that this cause is remanded to the Un'ited States

D'istrict Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina for further

proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER 0RDERED that the appellants, Lacy H. Thornburg, et a1.,

recover from Ralph Gingles, et a1., Ten Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-three

Dollars and Eighty-eight Cents ($10,893.88) for their costs herein expended.

June 30, 1985

Printing of record: 913,317.38

Clerk's costs: 300.00

TOTAL: $13,617.39

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top