Index to Hardback 4

Public Court Documents
May 31, 1989 - July 13, 1989

Index to Hardback 4 preview

6 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Index to Hardback 4, 1989. e8b9a2df-207c-f011-b4cc-7c1e52467ee8. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/bc74781e-f4a2-4015-b556-8535a0adf841/index-to-hardback-4. Accessed November 06, 2025.

    Copied!

    ¢ » 

  

LULAC v. Mattox — 0844-02 HB #4 

Date No. 

5/31/89 Pltf-intvn HLA 1st set Reg. for Admns & 1st 

set expert witness intergs to defts Mattox et al. 1 

- do ~- Ltr fr SAI to John Neil, US Dist Clk, suggesting 

expert depos be taken 1st wk of July 2 

- do - Ltr to SAI fr McDonald re representation of Leg 
Black Caucus 3 

6/1/89 Ltr to Hicks fr Rios w/supplement to Intogs. #2 

#1 etc. 4 

- do - Not. to take depo of Jesse Oliver on 6/8/89 5 

- 40 - Ltr fr Hicks to Rios confirming depo of Dr. 
Brischetto on 6/12 6 

- do - State defts Suplmnt to Mot for Trial continuance / | 

6/2/89 Dallas Cty Judge Entz's Memo in Sup of Mot for 

continuance 8 

- do - Amended not. to take depo of Jesse Oliver at 

a different location 9 

- do ~- Ltr fr Engstrom to SAI re fee for analysis of 17 
elections for D.C. in Harris County, Tex. 9A 

- do - Ltr fr Hicks to SAI re depo of Dr. Brischetto & 

Mr. Weiser 10 

6/5/89 Copy ltr fr Godbey to J.Neil, Dep. Clk, w/Entz's 
memo in sup of mot for continuance and previously 

omitted exhibits (mot & exhbts not in file) 11 

- Ao State defts ans to pltf-intvns Houston Lawyers 

2nd set of interrgs & regs. for prod of docs 12 

- Qo - Copy follow-up ltr fr Hicks to Rios icw above 
interrogs 13 

6/6/89 Order denying State defts & judge Entz mots to 

continue, & amendment to Pretrial order 14 

- do - Order rescinding order above nunc pro tunc & 

amendment to Order relative to Pretrial 15 

- do ~- Order granting mot to strike intervention of Leg. 

Blk Caucus 16 

 



  

Date 

6/7/89 

6/15/89 

6/20/89 

6/23/89 

- do - 

6/24/89 

6/28/89 

(- do - 

(7/3/89 

6/30/89 

1/3/89 

- do - 

- do - 

7/17/89 

7/10/89 

- do - 

- do - 

7/11/89 

1/12/89 

LULAC v. Mattox - 0844-02 HB#4 Page 2 

No. 

Copy ltr fr Hicks to Cloutman confirming agreement 

to cancel depo of White, Tinsley & Weiser 

Garcia's ans to pltfs depo on written questions 

to LULAC - sent to SAI by Finkelstein 

State defts (Hicks) ans and objections to pltfs- 
intvnr HLA 1st req for admissions etc. 

Deft Wood's mot for resp to objections & amended 
mot to compel 

Deft Harris Cty Wood's 1st set interrogs 

Pltfs-intvnrs HLA resp to state defts 1st set 

of interrgs etc. 

Correction 1st page of deft Harris Cty Wood 

lst set interrgs 

David Richards & to SAI 

decision in Flight Atten- 

Ltrs to Finkelstein fr 

fr Clements re Sup Crt 

dants v. Zipes 

Deft Harris Cty Judge Wood's supplment ans to 
plt-intvnr 1st set interrogs etc 

Reply to Richards fr Finkelstein re Zipes 

Copy ltr fr Rubarts to Finkelstein re Garcia's 
responses 

Harris Cty Judge Wood's mot to compel discovery 

Travis Cty Dist. Jud mot to modify 

Pltf LULAC statewide resp to deft Wood's 1st 

set of interrgs & req for production 

Pltfs (Finkelstein) resp to Deft-intvnr Wood's 

Mot to compel discovery 

Not of oral depos of Ray Hardy, 

Plummer & reg for docs 

Berry, Bonner, 

Ltr fr Finkelstein to Rubarts re Garcia responses 

Pltfs-intvnr HLA's reply to deft-intvnr Wood's 

amended mot to compel 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

 



Date 

6/1/89 

_— do —" 

do 

- do - 

6/2/89 

- do 

6/5/89 

  

LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#4   

Pltf-intvn HLA lst set Reg. for Admns & 
lst set expert witness intergs to 
defts Mattox et al. 

Ltr fr SA to John Neil, US Dist Clk, 
suggesting expert depos be taken 1st 

wk of July 

Ltr to SAI fr McDonald re representation 

of Leg Black Caucus 

Ltr to Hicks fr Rios w/supplement to 
Intogs. #2, #7 etc. 

Not. to take depo of Jesse Oliver on 
6/8/8¢ 

Ltr fr Hicks to Rios confirming depo of 
Dr. Brischetto on 6/12 

State defts Suplmnt to Mot for Trial 

Continuance 

Memo fr Finkelstein to all counsel 

record plus Notice of Deposition, 
and Pltfs' Answer to Deft Wood's 

Amended Counterclaim 

Dallas Cty Judge Entz's Memo in Sup of Mot 
for continuance 

Amended not. to take depo of Je 
at a different location 

Ltr fr Engstrom to SAI re fee for analysis 
of 17 elections for D.C. in Harris County 

Ltr fr Hicks to SAI re depo of Dr. 

Brischetto & Mr. Weiser 

Copy ltr fr Godbey to J.Neil, Dep 

w/Entz's memo in sup of mot for 

and previously omitted exhibits 
exhbts not in file) 

ontinuance 

(63
) 

6 

7A 

9A 

pd
 

Ie
 

.
 

-
)
 

[I
Y 

 



  

AT of - 
Date 

6/6/89 

~ do 

6/7/89 

- do 

6/15/89 

  

LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#4   

State defts ans to pltf-intvns Houston 
Lawyers 2nd set of 
prod of docs 

Copy follow-up ltr 

interrogs 

Ltr 

Express fr E.V. 

District Judge Wood 
Defendants’ 

interrgs & regs. 

fr Hicks t Rios icw above 

to Clerk of U.S. 

Keye 
I 

Motion for 

District Ct. 

plus Harris County 
Sup 

Tr 

for 

via 

port for State 

ial 

Order denying State Defts & Judge Entz 
Mots to 

Pretrial 

contiue, 

order 

Order rescinding order above nunc pro tunc 
Order & amendment to 

Pretrial 

Order granting mot 
of Leg. Blk Caucus 

Copy ltr 

to 

& amendment to 

relative to 

strike intervention 

fr Hicks to Cloutman confirming 

agreement to cancel depo of White, 
Tinsley & Weiser 

Ltr. to S.1%11) fr 

Barbara Jordon's 

in the Court 

Garcia's ans 

questions to 
Finkelstein 

LULAC 

Liir to S.Ifi11 fr 

extension to answer 

State defts (Hicks) 

to pltfs-intvnr HLA 
admissions, etc. 

Deft Woods' for 

& amended 

mot 

mot 

Deft Harris 

3. McDonald 

that may be used 

sent 

Hicks, 
discovery 

to compel (2 

Cty Wood's 1st 

enclosing 

to pltfs depo on written 
to SAI by 

agreeing to 

ans and objections 

lst req for 

resp to objections 

Federal 

Continuance 

interrogs 

f
d
 Ww ” 

[I
Y 

18 

18A 

19



    

LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#4 

Pltfs-intvnrs HLA resp to state defts 
1st set of interrgs etc 

Ui
 

Q
 

rt
 1 ~ Correction 1st page of deft Harri: 

Wood 1st set interrgs 23  ] 
SN

 = 

Ltrs to Finkelstein fr David Richards 
& to SAI fr Clements re Sup Crt decision 
in Flight Attendants v. Zipes 24 

Deft Harris Cty Judge Wood's supplment ans 
to plt-intvnr lst set interrogs etc 25 

Reply to Richards fr Finkelstein re Zipes 26 

Copy ltr fr Rubarts to Finkelstein re 

sarcia's responses 2 

Harris Cty Judge Wood's mot to compel 
discovery 28 

Travis Cty Dist. Jud mot to modify 29 

Pltf LULAC statewide resp to deft Wood's 
lst set of interrgs & req for production 30 

Pltfs (Finkelstein) resp to Deft-intvnr Hh aed 2 " ’ ahah’ 

Wood's Mot to compel discovery 31 

Not of oral depos of Ray Hardy, Berry, 

Bonner, Plummer & req for docs 32 

Ltr fr Finkelstein to Rubarts re 

Garcia responses 33 

Pltfs-intvnr HLA's reply to deft-intvnr 
Wood's amended mot to compel (3 

 



& 

  

LULAC v. Mattox - 0844-02 HB#4 Page 

Date No. 

7/13/89 Ltr to Crt fr SAI w/copy of above reply to mot 

to compel 35 

7/13/89 Ltrs to Berry & Bonner re their depos on 7/27 

& 7/26 respectively 36 

- QO =- Memo fr SAI to McDonald - depo on written questions 

to Harris Cty Clerk 37

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.