Memorandum on Unusual Urban Renewal Litigation
Press Release
December 15, 1967

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 5. Memorandum on Unusual Urban Renewal Litigation, 1967. 52dcfc57-b892-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/bd5428a5-ddab-4a55-b2d6-6e6815d56e79/memorandum-on-unusual-urban-renewal-litigation. Accessed May 18, 2025.
Copied!
68 NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 tu legal! za & December 15, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO: SELECTED WASHINGTON REPORTERS RE: Unusual urban renewal litigation WASHINGTON---An injunction against Housing and Urban Development Secretary Robert Weaver in behalf of a San Francisco citizens' group was sought here today in U.S. District Court. The Negro and Japanese plaintiffs ask the court to halt Secretary Weaver's approval of that city's Western Addition Area A-2 Urban Re- newal Project. The complaint terms Secretary Weaver's "continuing approval of Federal financing" of this project as being "arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law." Three groups of attorneys are active in the case. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. sidiary, They are the (LDF) and its sub- the National Office for the Rights of the Indigent. They are working in conjunction with the San Francisco Neighbor- hood Legal Assistance Foundation, a legal services for the poor organization. These attorneys are representing the Western Addition Community Organizations (WACO), an association of churches, political, economic and social organizations, and local residents. If allowed to continue, San Francisco Urban Renewal Project will replace the present dwellings with new housing which "will rent at prices beyond the financial means of the majority of Negro and Japanese residents and elderly of all races in the area," the attorneys state. The plaintiffs specifically ask for a ruling declaring: * that they are "protected by the First Amendment both against arbitrary and unnecessary governmental suppression of their joint and several rights to associate for the promotion and advocacy of political and social goals..." the San Francisco Urban Development Project “unlawfully destroys and suppresses" their right to associate in violation of the freedom of speech and association under the First Amendment and the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment; * that Defendant Weaver enjoin urban renewal activities in San Francisco pending "such time as this court may be satisfied that said Federal funds are not being used tp deprive plaintiffs of the rights under the First and Fifth Amendments; * that Defendant Weaver be enjoined from approving and financing the San Francisco Urban Renewal Project "and to cease using Federal funds to demolish buildings and to acquire additional properties" until such time as the project plan is "found to be in conformity with Federal law..." =S0= NOTE: Please bear in mind that the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) is a separate and distinct organization from the NAACP serving as the legal arm of the entire civil rights movement and repre- senting m bers of all groups as well as unaffiliated individuals.