Memo from Lani Guinier to Appeals Committee (Steve Ralston) RE: Hunter v. Underwood

Correspondence
November 16, 1984

Memo from Lani Guinier to Appeals Committee (Steve Ralston) RE: Hunter v. Underwood preview

1 page

Cite this item

  • Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Memo from Lani Guinier to Appeals Committee (Steve Ralston) RE: Hunter v. Underwood, 1984. 11cfec4a-e692-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/be1f1b86-7b1d-4e59-8193-1963e48ce1b6/memo-from-lani-guinier-to-appeals-committee-steve-ralston-re-hunter-v-underwood. Accessed May 18, 2025.

    Copied!

    MEMO to: Appeals Committee (Steve Ralston)

From

Re

Date

: Lani Guinier

: Hunter v. Underwood

November L5, 1984

I have already submit,ted copies of the Ivlotion to Affirm
and the Juris&ictional Statement. Probabte jurisdiction
has been noted. Appellees' brief is due December 23.

I recommend we file an amicus brief on beha'If of the
appellees for the following reasons:

1. This case involves a 14th Amendment chal1enge
(successful in llth Circuit) to Alabama law disfranchising
only misdemeanants convicted of crimes involving moral
turpitude. We can make a special contribution because
of iesearch we have done and are doing on Alabama election
laws and on state election laws nationwide.

2. This is an important matter that should be well
presenteC to the Supreme Court because of its potential
inpact on 14th Amendment analyses, and on whether 52 of the
Voting Rights Act aPPlies.

3. This is the type of issue on which the Supreme
Court would. exPect our views.

4. A Colunrbia law student is already researchingt
some of the issues, under our supervision, for a law
review case comment.

LG/ r

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top