Memo from Lani Guinier to Appeals Committee (Steve Ralston) RE: Hunter v. Underwood
Correspondence
November 16, 1984
1 page
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Memo from Lani Guinier to Appeals Committee (Steve Ralston) RE: Hunter v. Underwood, 1984. 11cfec4a-e692-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/be1f1b86-7b1d-4e59-8193-1963e48ce1b6/memo-from-lani-guinier-to-appeals-committee-steve-ralston-re-hunter-v-underwood. Accessed December 07, 2025.
Copied!
MEMO to: Appeals Committee (Steve Ralston)
From
Re
Date
: Lani Guinier
: Hunter v. Underwood
November L5, 1984
I have already submit,ted copies of the Ivlotion to Affirm
and the Juris&ictional Statement. Probabte jurisdiction
has been noted. Appellees' brief is due December 23.
I recommend we file an amicus brief on beha'If of the
appellees for the following reasons:
1. This case involves a 14th Amendment chal1enge
(successful in llth Circuit) to Alabama law disfranchising
only misdemeanants convicted of crimes involving moral
turpitude. We can make a special contribution because
of iesearch we have done and are doing on Alabama election
laws and on state election laws nationwide.
2. This is an important matter that should be well
presenteC to the Supreme Court because of its potential
inpact on 14th Amendment analyses, and on whether 52 of the
Voting Rights Act aPPlies.
3. This is the type of issue on which the Supreme
Court would. exPect our views.
4. A Colunrbia law student is already researchingt
some of the issues, under our supervision, for a law
review case comment.
LG/ r