Memo from Lani Guinier to Appeals Committee (Steve Ralston) RE: Hunter v. Underwood
Correspondence
November 16, 1984

1 page
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Memo from Lani Guinier to Appeals Committee (Steve Ralston) RE: Hunter v. Underwood, 1984. 11cfec4a-e692-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/be1f1b86-7b1d-4e59-8193-1963e48ce1b6/memo-from-lani-guinier-to-appeals-committee-steve-ralston-re-hunter-v-underwood. Accessed May 18, 2025.
Copied!
MEMO to: Appeals Committee (Steve Ralston) From Re Date : Lani Guinier : Hunter v. Underwood November L5, 1984 I have already submit,ted copies of the Ivlotion to Affirm and the Juris&ictional Statement. Probabte jurisdiction has been noted. Appellees' brief is due December 23. I recommend we file an amicus brief on beha'If of the appellees for the following reasons: 1. This case involves a 14th Amendment chal1enge (successful in llth Circuit) to Alabama law disfranchising only misdemeanants convicted of crimes involving moral turpitude. We can make a special contribution because of iesearch we have done and are doing on Alabama election laws and on state election laws nationwide. 2. This is an important matter that should be well presenteC to the Supreme Court because of its potential inpact on 14th Amendment analyses, and on whether 52 of the Voting Rights Act aPPlies. 3. This is the type of issue on which the Supreme Court would. exPect our views. 4. A Colunrbia law student is already researchingt some of the issues, under our supervision, for a law review case comment. LG/ r