Motion for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice with Certification
Public Court Documents
October 5, 1992

5 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Motion for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice with Certification, 1992. 0c2946b0-a246-f011-877a-0022482c18b0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/be28ddbe-bfac-48eb-abea-e30b36c296c3/motion-for-admission-of-attorney-pro-hac-vice-with-certification. Accessed July 29, 2025.
Copied!
CV 89-0360977S8 MILO SHEFF, et al., : SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiffs, : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF : HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD V. WILLIAM A, O'NEILL, et al., Defendants. : OCTOBER 53, 1992 MOTION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE I, John R. Whelan, Assistant Attorney General, and counsel. for the defendants in the above-captioned case, hereby move for the admission of Attorney Alfred A. Lindseth, of the firm of Sutherland, Asbell & Brennan, 999 Peachtree Street, NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3996, Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned case. Mr. Lindseth is a member in good standing of the State Bar of Georgia and has been since 1973. He has been admitted to practice and is a member in good standing of the following courts: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, U.S. NO ORAL ARGUMENT REQUIRED NO TESTIMONY REQUESTED Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth, Fifth, and Eleventh Circuits, U.S. Supreme Court, Supreme Court of Georgia, and Court of Appeals of Gecrgia. Mr. Lindseth has worked on numerous school desegregation cases throughout the country including cases in Georgia, South Carolina, Tennessee, Missouri, North Carolina, and California. Good cause exist for the admission of Mr. Lindseth because of the | | complexity of the present matter, the short amount of time which | remains before trial, and the need for assistance from someone | | with Mr. Lindseth's background and experience. The plaintiffs' attorneys have expressed no objection to this motion. WHEREFORE, it is moved that Alfred A. Lindseth be admitted Pro Hac Vice for the purpose of this case and as counsel for the defendants. FOR THE DEFENDANTS RICHARD BLUMENTHAL ATTORNBY GENERAL / 7 By: TY / 7 Z Zl ld R.” Whelan - Juris 085112 istant Attorney General 0 Sherman Street He artford, Connecticut. 06105 Tel, 566-7173 ORDER For a good cause shown, GRANTED/DENIED. the foregoing motion 1S hereby By the Court, Honorable Harry Hammer CERTIFICATION This is toicertify that on this 5th day of October, 1992'a CODY of the foregoing was mailed to the following counsel of record: John Brittain, Esq. University of Connecticut School of Law 65 Elizabeth Street Hartford, CT 06105 Philip Tegeler, Esq. Martha Stone, Esq. Connecticut Civil Liberties Union 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT .06105 Ruben Franco, Esq. Jenny Rivera, Esq. Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund 99 Hudson Street l4th Floor New York, NY 10013 Wilfred Rodriguez, Esq. Hispanic Advocacy Project Neighborhood Legal Services 1229 Albany Avenue Hartford, CT 06112 Wesley W. Horton, Esq. Moller, Horton & Fineberg, P.C. 90 Gillett Street Hartford, CT" 06105 Julius L. Chambers, Marianne Lado, Esq. Ronald Ellis, Esq. Esq. NAACP Legal Defense Fund and Education Fund, 99 Hudson Street New York, NY Inc. 10013 John A. Powell, Esq. Helen Hershkoff, Esq. Adam S. Cohen, Esq. {| American Civil Liberties Union i 132 West 43rd Street |] New York, NY 10036 /7 / 7 / /) / | LA i | FAS! F. V4 JEAN R. Whelan ASsistant Attorney General f / LP