Motion for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice with Certification
Public Court Documents
October 5, 1992
5 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Motion for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice with Certification, 1992. 0c2946b0-a246-f011-877a-0022482c18b0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/be28ddbe-bfac-48eb-abea-e30b36c296c3/motion-for-admission-of-attorney-pro-hac-vice-with-certification. Accessed November 02, 2025.
Copied!
CV 89-0360977S8
MILO SHEFF, et al., : SUPERIOR COURT
Plaintiffs, : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
: HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN
AT HARTFORD
V.
WILLIAM A, O'NEILL, et al.,
Defendants. : OCTOBER 53, 1992
MOTION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
I, John R. Whelan, Assistant Attorney General, and counsel.
for the defendants in the above-captioned case, hereby move for
the admission of Attorney Alfred A. Lindseth, of the firm of
Sutherland, Asbell & Brennan, 999 Peachtree Street, NE, Atlanta,
Georgia 30309-3996, Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned case.
Mr. Lindseth is a member in good standing of the State Bar
of Georgia and has been since 1973. He has been admitted to
practice and is a member in good standing of the following
courts: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia,
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, U.S.
NO ORAL ARGUMENT REQUIRED
NO TESTIMONY REQUESTED
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth, Fifth, and Eleventh
Circuits, U.S. Supreme Court, Supreme Court of Georgia, and Court
of Appeals of Gecrgia. Mr. Lindseth has worked on numerous school desegregation cases throughout the country including cases
in Georgia, South Carolina, Tennessee, Missouri, North Carolina,
and California.
Good cause exist for the admission of Mr. Lindseth because of the |
|
complexity of the present matter, the short amount of time which |
remains before trial, and the need for assistance from someone |
|
with Mr. Lindseth's background and experience.
The plaintiffs' attorneys have expressed no objection to this
motion.
WHEREFORE, it is moved that Alfred A. Lindseth be admitted Pro
Hac Vice for the purpose of this case and as counsel for the
defendants.
FOR THE DEFENDANTS
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL
ATTORNBY GENERAL
/ 7
By: TY / 7 Z Zl ld
R.” Whelan - Juris 085112
istant Attorney General
0 Sherman Street
He
artford, Connecticut. 06105
Tel, 566-7173
ORDER
For a good cause shown,
GRANTED/DENIED.
the foregoing motion 1S hereby
By the Court,
Honorable Harry Hammer
CERTIFICATION
This is toicertify that on this 5th day of October, 1992'a CODY
of the foregoing was mailed to the following counsel of record:
John Brittain, Esq.
University of Connecticut
School of Law
65 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
Philip Tegeler, Esq.
Martha Stone, Esq.
Connecticut Civil
Liberties Union
32 Grand Street
Hartford, CT .06105
Ruben Franco, Esq.
Jenny Rivera, Esq.
Puerto Rican Legal Defense
and Education Fund
99 Hudson Street
l4th Floor
New York, NY 10013
Wilfred Rodriguez, Esq.
Hispanic Advocacy Project
Neighborhood Legal Services
1229 Albany Avenue
Hartford, CT 06112
Wesley W. Horton, Esq.
Moller, Horton &
Fineberg, P.C.
90 Gillett Street
Hartford, CT" 06105
Julius L. Chambers,
Marianne Lado, Esq.
Ronald Ellis, Esq.
Esq.
NAACP Legal Defense Fund and
Education Fund,
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY
Inc.
10013
John A. Powell, Esq.
Helen Hershkoff, Esq.
Adam S. Cohen, Esq.
{| American Civil Liberties Union
i 132 West 43rd Street
|] New York, NY 10036
/7 / 7 / /) /
| LA i
| FAS! F.
V4
JEAN R. Whelan
ASsistant Attorney General
f /
LP