Defendant's Answer to Complaint.
Public Court Documents
July 11, 1977
6 pages
-
Case Files, Hatcher v. Methodist Hospital - Hardbacks. Defendant's Answer to Complaint., 1977. 7362db65-5484-f111-ab0f-7c1e527d528a. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c22ce825-eea9-41ad-967e-29b8c8bbcb39/defendants-answer-to-complaint. Accessed October 10, 2026.
Copied!
[||a1eb0718-9d34-448d-a94d-12518de2c8dc||] : Ww #
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT fee
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
HZ
RICHARD GORDON HATCHER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Vv, Civil No. H 77-154
METHODIST HOSPITAL OF GARY, INC.,
et ‘al,,
Defendants.
ANSWER :
Defendant Joseph Califano, Secretary of Health, Education
and Welfare (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the federal
defendant) by his undersigned attorneys hereby responds to the
Complaint as follows:
Pirst Defense
Plaintiffs have failed to exhaust their administrative
remedies.
Second Defense
The Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of
the action.
Third Defense
The complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief
can be granted.
Fourth Defense
In answer to the numbered paragraphs of the Complaint,
the federal defendant admits, denies and alleges as follows:
1. This paragraphs contains plaintiffs' characterization
of its action to which no answer is required, but insofar as
an answer may be deemed required, deny.
2. This paragraph contains conclusions of law and not
averments of fact to which an answer is required,
as an answer may be deemed required, deny.
3. The first four sentences of this paragra
. .
plaintiffs' characterization of this action to which no answer
is required, but insofar as an answer may be deemed required,
-
deny. The remainder of the paragraph contains conclusions of
law and not allegations of fact to which an answer is require
but insofar as an answer may be deemed required, deny.
4. Admit the first and third sentences. The federal
defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to
form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations
contained in the ‘second and fourth sentences. Deny the fifth
and sixth sentences.
5. The federal defendant is without knowledge or infor-
mation sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or falsity
of the allegations contained in the first, second and third
sentences. Deny the fourth sentence.
6. Deny the last sentence. The federal defendant is
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
as to the truth or falsity of the remaining allegations.
7. Deny first sentence except to admit that Methodist
Hospital of Gary, Inc. is a not-for profit corporation orga-
nized under the laws of the State of Indiana which currently
operates a l65-bed facility in Merriville, and affirmatively
allege that HEW figures from November 1976 show that the hos-
l operates a 385-bed facllity in the city of Gary. Deny
the second sentence except to admit that Methodist Hospital
of Gary, Inc. is a recipient of federal funds under the Hill-
Burton Act and the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Admit the
third and fourth sentence. Deny the fifth sentence. Admit the
sixth sentence.
8S. Admit.
9. Admit, except to affirmatively state that the Health
- ans 7 il Hi a RT Em RC Re
Facilities Services and Review Development Division is called J in
“ §
\
e Health Facilities, Services and Resource Development Bureau 7
and the other division of the State Agency is the Health Resources
Development Division.
10. Admit, except to affirmatively state that the
Health Facilities, Services and Review Development Division
is called the Health Facilities Services.
11. The federal defendant is without knowledge or infor-
mation sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or falsity
of this allegation.
12... Admit.
13. Admit the first sentence. The federal defendant
is without information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief
as to the truth or falsity of the allegation in the second
sentence.
14. Deny the first sentence except to admit that Broadway
Methodist Hospital is located in Merrillville, Lake County,
Indiana, approximately fifteen miles south of Gary Methodist
Hospital. Admit the second sentence. The federal defendant
is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
as to the truth or falsity of the remaining allegations.
15. Admit the first sentence. Deny the second sentence.
16. Deny except to admit that the Broadway facility
located in Merriville, Indiana has a small minority population
and that the linear acceleration is located only at Broadway.
The federal defendant is without knowledge and information
sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the
allegations concerning the location of handicapped persons in
South Lake County.
17. Deny and affirmatively allege that Methodist Hospital
of Gary, Inc. received a grant of $1,152,527, a guarantee on a
loan of $14,336,183.12 and an interest subsidy of 86,032,555.54.
18. «Deny.
19. Admit first sentence. Deny second sentence and
affirmatively allege that the 1976 application requested
$3,281,370 for a health services building at Gary, $3,599,800
for a health services building at Merriville, and $1,262,200
for a laundry at Merriville which will serve both facilities.
20. Admit.
21. Admit.
22. Admit the first sentence. Deny the second sentence
except to admit that-a letter from Mr. Clarence Wood raised
the issue of inferior health care to the poor and minority
persons of Gary. Deny the last two sentences and respectfully
refer the Court to the letter from Alfred Sanchez dated
October 21, 1976 with attachments labelled Hill-Burton
Applications of the Methodist Hospital, Inc. for a full
statement of its terms and qualifications.
23. Admit the first sentence. Deny the second sentence.
24. Deny and affirmatively allege that none of the named
plaintiffs wrote objections to HEW.
25. ‘Deny.
26. Deny.
27. “Deny.
28. Deny.
29. This paragraph contains plaintiffs' prayer for re-
lief to which no answer is required.
The federal defendant hereby specifically denies all of
the allegations of the complaint not hereinbefore otherwise
answered.
Respectfully submitted,
Po
7 / } ST
= V4 yd 7 5; ZZ po
; / : ) A Aran 4 4 7. - Loa Arte CR [Pr
BARBARA ALLEN BABCOCK “7
Assistant Attorney General
RICHARD IL. KIESER
TT LA £2 on de
NA bh de Vala AA 2) Ch XS my
OF COUNSEL:
JEFFREY CHAMPAGNE,
U.S. Department of Health,
Education and Welfare
MARVIN G. GARVIN
Regional Attorney
EDWARD L. KOVEN
Assistant Regional Attorney
Department of Health,
Education and Welfare
300 South Wacker Drive
18th Floor
Chicago, Illinois
PRED W. GRADY
Assistant United States Art
Pr
o> —" | 2
7 po ah fv - gli, wil aA rd 2A
“DEN Is Co TINDER
V4 id —-— : / 72 og
Ietteeca JL. AoSiirs JERE, I... 4 a, 5 2, = +f .
REBECCA Is. “ROSS =
Attorneys for Defendant
Attorneys, Department of
Washington, D.C. 20530
Telephone: 739-4267
Justice
® *
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of Defendants Answer has
al |
/ A
been served this 45 day of July, 1977 by mailing
postage prepaid to:
Is. Beth Lief
Mr. Jack Greenberg
Ir. Melvyn Leventhal
10 Columbus Circle
1 New York, New York 10019
Mr. Julian Allen
2009 Broadway
Gary, Indiana 46407
0h ©) Ms. Marilyn G.- Ros
Ms. Christine B. Hickman
1757 N Street, N.VW,
Washington, D.C. 20036
Mr. Bruce E. Sayers
Hodges, Davis, Greenberg, Compton
: & Sayers
5525 Broadway
Gary, Indiana 46401
Kipton Kaplan
Executive Director, Northern Indiana
Comprehensive Health Services Agency,
Inc.
900 East Colfax Avenue
South Bend, Indiana 46617
Michael Schaefer
Assistant Attorney General
of Indiana
219 State House
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
EECCA Tos [||a1eb0718-9d34-448d-a94d-12518de2c8dc||]