Memorandum from Lani Guinier to Julius Chambers
Correspondence
April 4, 1986
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Memorandum from Lani Guinier to Julius Chambers, 1986. d16d55e8-e992-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c24d2fb5-d9f6-437c-ad4c-831a3a1e8186/memorandum-from-lani-guinier-to-julius-chambers. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
T/1.^o)^
Lani Guinier
April 4, 1986
Julius
I gather from our meeting on Friday tlat you
do not want LDF on the original petition in
the California Supreme Court. I disagree
with this decision for the following reasons:
1. The document we have is the memo-
randum in suPPort of the Petition,
not the petition itself-
2. The attorneY for the ACLU who is
drafting the Petition has done
this on 2 prior, more controver-
sial cases, both of which the
California Supreme Court took.
3. If the Court denies the writ, it
will simplY send it back to the
Superior CourtPIus nothing,
except 2 weeks, will be lost (the
time in which t'he Court will
decide whether to take it).
4. I regret your decision but have
notified ACLU attorneY l{ark
Rosenbaum that LDF will not be
participating.
LG/ r
cc: James Nabrit
Steve Ralston
,.') r'
"t <