Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Paul Hancock, Esq. Re Chisom v. Edwards
Correspondence
May 14, 1987

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Paul Hancock, Esq. Re Chisom v. Edwards, 1987. 9d729b6e-ea92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c2a677f9-0ad5-42f4-95f1-563e2aa4454a/correspondence-from-pamela-karlan-to-paul-hancock-esq-re-chisom-v-edwards. Accessed June 01, 2025.
Copied!
LesarUerenseH' May 14, L987 PauI Hancock, Esg. Voting Section Civi} Rights Division Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: Chisom v. Edwards Dear PauI: f am enclosing copies of the amended courplaint and papers pertaining to the notion to disniss. (The only thing I have not copied is my cover letter to the couit enclosing a copy of Judge Barbourrs decision in Kirksey & Martin v. Allain.) As I told you on the phone this afternoon, we shall definitely be appealing Judge Schwartz's decision. f will send you a copy of the judgrnent and notice of appeal as soon as I get them. If you want anything else, please give ure a caII. I hope that the Department will decide to participate on our side in the Court of Appeals. Sincerely, % Pamela S. Karlan enclosures: amended courplaint motion to dismiss opposition reply memorandum Contributions are deductible lor U.S. incorne tat purposes The NAACp Legat Delense & Educational Fund, lnc. (LDF) is not part ol the National Association lor the Advancement ot Colored People (N,qACP) allhough t-OF was tornO6O UVthe NAACpand shares its commitment to equal rights. L0F has had lor over25 years a separate Board, program, statt, otlice and budget. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 99 Hudson Street, New york, N.y. 10019 o (Z1Zl219.1900 r a,,"1(..f..\U/lal I , 'i