Memorandum in Support of Appellees Proposed Order

    IN THE 

  

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE PIFTH CIRCUIT 

  

NO. 76-4210 

  

WILEY LL. BOLDEN, et aL. * 

Plaintiffs- Appellees,® 

Vv. * 

CITY OF MOBILE, et al., * 

Defendants—-Appellants.* 

NOTICE OF ELECTION 

F DEFERRED APPENDIX 
  

  

Come now Appellants in the above-styled cause, 

through undersigned counsel, and give notice of their 

election under Rule 30 (c) of the Federal Rules of 

Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 13 (e) of the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 

to defer the filing of an appendix in the above-styled 

cause until twenty-one (21) days after service of the 

brief of the appellees in this appeal. 

Uihy B bosdot! 
CHARLES B. ARENDALL, Attorney 

for Appellants . 

  

OF COUNSEL: 

HAND, ARENDALL, BEDSOLE, GREAVES & JOHNSTON 

3000 First National Bank Building 
Mobile, Alabama 36602 

 



  

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
  

I do hereby certify that I have on this 15th 

day of February, 1977, served a copy of the foregoing 

pleading on counsel for all parties to this proceeding 

by mailing the same by United States mail, properly 

addressed, and first class postage prepaid. 

/ ; he) o 

{ret YT RG Po 

7
X
 

4 fr” 
Umer 

  

CHARLES B. ARENDALL 

 



IN THE 

UNITED STATES COURT Or APPEALS 

POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

  

NO. 76-4210 

  

WILEY I.. BOLDEN, et al., 

Plaintiffs—-Appellees, 

V. 

CITY OF MOBILE, et al., 

Defendants—-Appellants. 

CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS 
  

The undersigned counsel for Appellants cextifies 

that the record in the above-styled cause, including 

all necessary exhibits but not including the transcript, 

is complete for the purposes of this appeal. 

A copy of the docket entries in the case of 

Wiley IL. Bolden, et al. versus City of Mobile, et al. - 

Civil Action No. J5=2971 is included herewith pursuant 

to Rule 11 (c) of the Federal Rules of Eppellate Procedure. 

The Appellants have on February 15, 1977 filed a 

motion with this Court to extend th ime for filing 

of the transcript until March 4 to an 

unavoidable delay in its preparation. 

Fal : > A yore 2 
} 

oo pe-Lommie si pen A = pi 
‘CHARLES B. ARENDALL, Attorney 

for Appellants 

pn RA, Te | 
     



OF COUNSEL: 

HAND, ARENDALL, BEDSOLE, GREAVES & JOINSTOHN 

3000 First National Bank Building 

Mobile, Alabama 36602 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
  

I do hereby certify that I have on this 15th day 

of February, 1977, served a copy of the foregoing 

pleading on counsel for all parties to this proceeding, 

by mailing the same by United States mail, properly 

addressed, and first class postage prepaid. 

ol & 
  

CHARLES B. 

 



UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

  

NO. 76-4210 

  

WILEY L. BOLDEN, et al., 

Plaintiffs—Appellees, 

Vv. 

CITY OF MOBILE, et al., 

Defendants—-Appellants. 

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

FILING OF TRANSCRIPT 
  

  

Come now the Appellants herein, through under- 

signed counsel, pursuant to Rule 11 (4d) and 12 (a) oi 

the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and move 

this Court to extend the time for the filing of the 

transcript for 14 days until March 4, 1977, for the 

following reasons: 

1. The District Court has previcusly granted 

a Fifty (50) day extension of time for filing of the 

record, pursuant to Rule 11 (d) of the Federal Rules 

of Appellate Procedure, which time expires on February 

77. 

2. Tha Clerk of the District Court has 

counsel for the Appellants that the record, except for  



the transcript, will be ready for filing as of February 17, 

1977. However, the court reporter has informed counsel 

for the Appellants that the transcript of the proceedings, 

which is approximately 1500 pages in length, is not 

finished, and he will require another 14 days for its 

completion. 

3. Pursuant to Local Rule 8 (c) of the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, attache 

is a letter of explanation from the court reporter. 

WHEREFORE, Appellants pray that the time for 

filing of the transcript be extended for 14 days until 

March 4, 1977. 

Respectfully submitted this 15th day orf February, 

18737. 

> 7 77 a 

A #7 77 7” N rf v 5 
{.~/ fr. PAR. GF SF WP LW 

CHARLES B. ARENDALL, Attorney 

for Appellants 

  

OF COUNSEL: 

HAND, ARENDALL, BEDSOLE, GREAVES & JOINSTON 

3000 First National Bank Building 

iobile, Alabama 36602 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
  

I do hereby certify that I have on this 15th day 

of February, 1977, served a copy of the foregoing motion 

on counsel for all parties to this proceeding, by mailing 

the same by United States mail, properly addressed, and 

first class postage prepaid. 

{ if Se od > ET La A i — 

    

CHARLES B. ARENDALL 

 



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

  

CHARLES A. HowARrD P.O. Box 1971 

OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER MoBILE, ALABAMA 26601 

February 15, 1977 

William Tidwell, Esquire 

Attorney at Law 

3000 First National Bank Building 
Mobile, Alabama 

Re: Bolden Vs. City of Mobile 

Dear Mr. Tidwell: 

With regard to our telephone conversation of yester- 

day, I am requesting, in writing, an extension bu roguested of The 

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals of fourteen (14) days to and 

including the 4th day of March. 

I find it necessary to request this extension because 

within the last ninety (90) days I have had to also xangoribe 

a lengthy criminal appeal consisting of some 1536 pages another 

of 497 pages in addition to the 1130 pages completed on this. 

I am now working on the last afternoon of testimony and have only 

the arguments to complete. 

Thank you for attending to this mater. 

ety 7 

(hm 
Aa A. Howard 

Official Court Reporter 

CAH :sbm