Letter to Court From Clippert RE: Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion of Rehearing In Banc

Public Court Documents
July 26, 1972

Letter to Court From Clippert RE: Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion of Rehearing In Banc preview

1 page

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Letter to Court From Clippert RE: Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion of Rehearing In Banc, 1972. 11418181-53e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c2f04c0a-94af-489f-a95d-8771c6e35a18/letter-to-court-from-clippert-re-petition-for-rehearing-and-suggestion-of-rehearing-in-banc. Accessed October 11, 2025.

    Copied!

    C L A U C E
R O B E R T  E .  MCKEAN 
E D G A R  C .  H C W B E R T  
R . W I L L i A M  R O G E R S  
T. D O N A L D  W AD E  
C H A R L E S  R .  M O ON  
B . C O U R T N E Y  RA N K IN  
W IL LI A M  G .  L E R C H E N ,  J R .  
E R N E S T  G E T Z  
W.  G E R A L D  W A R R E N  
B E N J A M I N  O .  S C H W E N D E N E R .  J R .  
M I LT O N  M . T H O M P S O N  
W A R D  RAN D O L ,  J  R.
R U S S E L L  A .  M c N AI R .  J R .  
G E O R G E  B . M A R T I N ,  J R  
H E R B E R T  G .  S P A R R O W ,  III 
J U D S O N  W E R 3 E L O W  
J O H N  R. A X E  
J O H N  A .  E V E R H A R O U S  
R O B E R T  V .  P E T E R S O N  
P E T E R  S .  S H E L O O N  
J O Y C E  Q .  L O W E R  
T H O M A S  G.  K I E N S A U M  
L A W R E N C E  -G. C A M P B E L L  
C H A R L E S  T .  H A R R I S  
R O B E R T  F. M A G I L L . J R .
K E N N E T H  J .  M C IN T Y R E

D I C K I N S O N ,  W R I G H T ,  M c K E A N  & C U D L i P

WI LLI A M B .  C U D L I P  
A U G U S T U S  C . L E D Y A R D  
J O H N  G .  G A R L I N G H O U S E  
W I ’-L IAM A . W A L K E R  . 
D O N A L D  R.  F L I N T E R M A N N  
D A N I E L  J .  T I N D A L L .  J R .  
F R E D  W.  F R E E M A N  .
F R E D E R I C K  K . P L U M B  
" A T R I C K  J .  L E D W I D G E  
G E O R G E  E .  M c K EA N  
V E R N E  C .  H A M P T O N ,  II 
C H A R L E S  F. C L I P P E R S  
LAW P E N C E  M.  KELLY  
J O H N  E .  S .  S C O T T  
J O H N  C .  O ' M E A R A  
J O H N  A .  K R S U L ,  J R .  
D O U G L A S  D .  R O C H E  
T H O M A S  E . O W E N  
E D G A R  C .  H O W B E R T ,  J R .  
R O B E R T  S .  K R A U S E  
R O B E R T  P. H I J R L B E R T  
WI LLI A M F. B A V I N G E R . I I I  
J .  T H O M A S  C A R R O L L ,  JR .  
R A l PH s . r u m s e y  
J A M E S  N. C A N D L E R ,  J R .

C O U N S E L L O R S  A T  L AW

1 7 0 0  N O R T H  W O O D W A R D  A V E N U E  

P.  O .  B O X  5 0 9

B L O O M F I E L D  H I L L S  , M I C H  I G A N  4 Q O I 3

T E L E P H O N E  (3 13) 6 A S  - 4 3  GO

July 26, 1972

O F  C O U N S E L  
E D W A R D  L . W E B E R

D E T R O I T  O F F I C E  

8 0 0  F I R S T  N A T I O N A L  B U I L D I N G  
D E T R O I T ,  M I C H I G A N  4 - 8 2 2 6  

T E L E P H O N E  ( 3 1 3 )  9 6 2 - 5 3 6 0

L A N S I N G  O F F I C E  

117 W E S T  A L L E G A N  S T R E E T  

L A N S I N G ,  M I C H I G A N  4 8 9 3 3  

T E L E P H O N E  ( 5 1 7 )  3 7 1 - 1 7 3 0

James A. Higgins, Esq.
Clerk, United States Court of Appeals 

for the Sixth Circuit 
609 Post Office Building 
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

Re: Bloomfield Hills School District
v. Stephen J. Roth, United States 
District Judge, No. 72-1651

Dear Mr. Higgins:
Enclosed for filing in the above matter pursuant to 

Rule 40, F.R.A.P. are five (5) copies of the Petition for^ 
Rehearing and Suggestion for Hearing In Banc of Bloomfield 
Hills School District.

Inasmuch as the hearing in Bradley v. 
set for August 24 , 1972, we v/ould appreciate _ the 
possible consideration of the enclosed Petition.

Milliken 
earliest

is

Very truly yours,

" A  r. / t o  /. ■: :>O '

Charles F. Clipper!

CFC: ma!

Enclosures

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.