Order Approving Coffee County's Settlement; Orders

Public Court Documents
October 23, 1986 - October 30, 1986

Order Approving Coffee County's Settlement; Orders preview

4 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Order Approving Coffee County's Settlement; Orders, 1986. d8b101ba-b7d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c32c7993-d5cd-4e9d-99af-cf72692f26da/order-approving-coffee-countys-settlement-orders. Accessed October 09, 2025.

    Copied!

    TN / / 

® Elen. if /®, 
Rl MU” FILED 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OCT 30 1986 

NORTHERN DIVISION paw 
LIVIA 

US DisT. Count 

  

f MIDDLE DIST. OF AL’. 

JOHN DILLARD, ET AL., DEPUTY CLERK, BY 

Plaintiffs, 

v. CIViL ACTION NO. CV 85-T-1332-N 

CRENSHAW COUNTY, ALABAMA 
ET-AL., 

N
a
s
t
?
 

N
e
e
s
 

N
e
e
”
 

N
a
a
t
 

M
e
e
t
?
 

a
t
t
?
 

e
a
e
?
 

ae
ra
? 

“
a
t
”
 

“
e
a
?
”
 

Defendants. 

ORDER APPROVING COFFCE COUNTY'S SETTLEMENT 
  

Pursuant to the order of this court entered August 27, 

1686, this court has been notified that the Department of Justice 

has precleared the proposed election plan for Coffee County 

pursuant to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 11965, 42 U.S.C. 

Section 1973(c). The court having previously determined in its 

order of August 27, 1986, that the requirements of Rule 23, 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were met and that the proposed 

settlement was fair, just and equitable, and the Department of 

Justice having now precleared the proposed changes pursuant to 

Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the court hereby finally 

approves the proposed settlement. The proposed consent decree 

previously submitted by the parties will be approved with the 

understanding that paragraphs 7 and 8 of the proposed consent 

decree are no lcnger applicable. 

DONE this Ae uy of DIL, J 1986. 
  

    
UNIVED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

ZL 
 



% » FILED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE 0CT 2 7 1986 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION 

J HOMAS C. CAVER, CLER: 

  

JOHN DILLARD, et al., ) 

) DEPUTY CLERK 

Plaintiffs, ) 

) 
Ve ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 85-T-1332-N 

) 
CRENSHAW COUNTY, etc., et al., ) 

) 
Defendants. ) 

ORDER 
  

For good cause, it is ORDERED that the October 24, 1986, motion 

for summary judgment filed by defendants Ann Tate, et al., is denied. 

DONE, this the 27th day of October, 1986. 

  

UMITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ~ 

 



    

® » 

  

FIIL.ED 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 
NORTHERN DIVISION OCT 2 7 1986 

THOMAS C. 2AVER, CLER; 
JOHN DILLARD, et als, * BY : 

DEPUTY CLERK 

PLAINTIFFS, * 

VS: * CASE NO. 85-T-1332-N 

CRENSHAW COUNTY, ALABAMA, * 
et als, 

requesting that election schedule to be ordered. The motion is not 
opposed by the plaintiffs. 

respect to the district elections, called for by the Calhoun County 
plan, 

DEFENDANTS. 

ORDER 

The Court has considered the Motion of Calhoun County 

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that with 

the following schedule will be implemented: 

l. Noon, October 31, 1986, end of qualifying 

2, November 18, 1986, party primaries 

3. December 9, 1986, run-off elections 

4, December 30, 1986, general election 

DONE this 27th day Of October, 1986. 

(i= 
  

0.:S. DISTRICT JUDGE ~~.   
 



® s i / 
A) x » 4 - 7) Io) i 

Fata Pl EL ED 
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE 

  

0CT 23 1986 
THOMAS C. CAVER, CLER: 

¥ 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION 

a SR nt SL 

PEPYTY eLpnK Kis 
JOHN DILLARD, et al., ) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

v. 4 CIVIL ACTION NO. 85-T-1332-N 

CRENSHAW COUNTY, etc., et al., ) 

Defendants. ) 

ORDER 
  

The Calhoun County defendants have orally requested that the court 

clarify whether its October 21, 1986, judgment and injunction requires that 

all five commissioners under the county's plan be elected by single-member 

districts under new primary and general elections conducted prior to January 

1, 1987. Upon consideration of the request, it is ORDERED and DECLARED that 

all five commissioners under the plan for Calhoun County should be elected 

by single-member districts under new primary and general elections conducted 

prior to January 1, 1987. 

DONE, this the 23rd day of October, 1986. 

PA ovens 
  

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE = —

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.