Memorandum of Defendants in Support of Motion to Amend Judgment
Public Court Documents
March 7, 1978
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Norwood v. Harrison - Hardbacks. Memorandum of Defendants in Support of Motion to Amend Judgment, 1978. c40995fa-722e-f111-88b4-0022482cdbbc. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c3e39ef7-0d81-48da-81dd-a09b93921b02/memorandum-of-defendants-in-support-of-motion-to-amend-judgment. Accessed July 18, 2026.
Copied!
[||72e70fe3-139d-4dc7-8bcb-f785f6a04b0e||] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WESTERN DIVISION
DELORES NORWOOD, et al.,
PLAINTIFFS
Y. CIVIL ACTION
NO. WC 70-53-K
D. L. HARRISON, et al. ,
DEFENDANTS
MEMORANDUM OF DEFENDANTS IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT
On March 2, 1976 this Court entered an Order declaring that
the members and executive secretary of the Mississippi State Textbook
Purchasing Board be assessed in their official capacity with liability for
the sum of $23,852.00 as attorney fees due and payable to counsel for
plaintiffs and $4,999.44 taxable costs incurred by plaintiffs. Defendants
filed a Notice of Appeal from this Order and filed a Motion for Stay Without
Supersedeas Bond, which this Court granted by Order dated March 22, 1976.
As a condition of the Order of March 22, 1976, it was provided that if the
Order of March 2, 1976 is affirmed on appeal, then the amount of the award
so affirmed shall bear interest in the amount of eight percent (8 %) per
annum from March 2, 1976 until paid.
The appeal was briefed and argued to the United States Court
of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which rendered an opinion on November 21,
1977, in which that Court held that the Order of this Court of March 2, 1976
from which the appeal was taken was not a "final judgment" from which an
appeal may be taken. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals ordered that the
appeal be dismissed. Norwood v. Harrison (5 Cir. , 1977, No. 76-1865).
Defendants submit that the fact that the Court of Appeals has
held that the Order of March 2, 1976 was not an appealable order is per-
suasive and strong authority for this Court to amend its Amended Order
of February 27, 1978 so as to provide that interest should run on the
judgment from and after the entry of the Final Judgment of this Court dated
January 3, 1978, and not from the date of the prior Order of this Court.
First, the terms of the Order of this Court of March 22, 1976
granting the motion of defendants for stay of the Order of March 2, 1976
provides that:
In the event that such Order [of March 2,
1976] is affirmed on appeal, then the amount
of the award so affirmed shall bear interest
in the amount of 8 % per annum from
March 2, 1976, until paid.
(Emphasis added.)
The Order of this Court of March 2, 1976 was not affirmed by the Court of
Appeals. The appeal was dismissed. The provision in this Court's Amended
Order of February 27, 1978 that interest should run from March 2, 1976 until
paid appears to be contrary to the intent of the March 22, 1976 Order of this
Court.
Secondly , Rule 54(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
specifies in pertinent part that:
'Judgment' as used in these rules includes a
decree and any order from which an appeal
lies.
It has been held that a "final decision" from which an appeal
is permitted under 28 U.S.C., § 1291 is equivalent to a "judgment", as
defined by Rule 54(a), F.R.C.P. . In Re Forstner Chain Corp. ,
177 F. 2d 572 { Cir. , 1949). -
Since it is clear that the March 2, 1976 Order of this Court
was not a "judgment" within the meaning of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, it would be inequitable to access interest against defendants
from the date of the entry of such Order.
Respectfully submitted,
A. F. SUMMER, ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
PETER M. STOCKETT, JR.
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
er
PETER M. STOCKETT,! JR.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned, Peter M. Stockett, Jr., Assistant Attorney
General for the State of Mississippi, hereby certifies that a true and
correct copy of the foregoing Motion to Amend Judgment and Notice of
Motion have been mailed by United States mail, postage prepaid, to the
following:
Bill Lann Lee, Esq.
Jack Greenberg, Esq.
10 Columbus Circle, Suite 2030
New York, New York 10019
Fred L. Banks, Jr. , Esq.
538 1/2 North Farish Street
Jackson, Mississippi 39202
This the’ HD. day of March, 1978.
Lee m <latr T
PETER M. STOCKETT,'JR. [||72e70fe3-139d-4dc7-8bcb-f785f6a04b0e||]