Defendants' Response to Interrogatories, Timothy A. Hawsey

Public Court Documents
February 20, 1986

Cite this item

Defendants' Response to Interrogatories, Timothy A. Hawsey preview

6 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Voting Rights
Matter
- Dillard v. Crenshaw County
Case
- Dillard v. Crenshaw County
U.S. state
- Alabama
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 08950bf0-b9d8-ef11-a730-7c1e5218a39c

Cite this item

Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Index to Hardback 7, 1986. 45273c59-b9d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f92670d8-7f89-47c7-9ce7-7267e6bb3bfa/index-to-hardback-7. Accessed April 06, 2025.

Copied!

    6/9 

6/11 

6/11 

6/12 

6/12 

6/12 

6/12 

6/13 

6/13 

DILLARD V. CRENSHAW 

HARDBACK #7 

Letter to Burnham, Floyd, Boyd, Kirk, 1 
Rowe, Martin, Speake, Vaughn from J. 
BRlacksher re: settlement negotiations, 
if possible. 

Notice of Proposed Redistricting for the 2 
Etowah County Commission 

Letter to Judge Thompson from Jack Floyd 3 
re: Settlement Issue and Length of Trial 
Etowah County Time Schedule and Offer of 
Judgment 

Letter to Judge Thompson from D.R. Boyd 4 
re: filing a proposed schedule for 
compliance 

Letter to Judge Thompson from H. Jones, Jr. 5 
Re: Status Report 

Letter to Judge Thompson from D.R. Boyd 6 
Re: the Court clarifying its intention of 
Plaintiffs to add the State as Defendants 

Letter to Judge Thompson from L.T. Menefee 7 
re: Plaintiffs will need two to three days 
to present their case. 

Letter to Judge Thompson from Warren Rowe 8 
Re: Response to status report on settlement 

negotiations on the part of Coffee County 

Letter to Judge Thompson from L.T. Menefee 9 
re: settlement discussions progress and 
the need for two to three days for plaintiffs 
to prepare their case. 

Letter to Kirk from Blacksher re: Responding 10 
to prior letter of settlement 

Letter to Clerk Caver from Blacksher - Motion By 
to Shorten Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’ 
Third Discovery Requests; Plaintiffs' Third 
Discovery Request to Etowah County Defendants; 
Plantiffs' Third Discovery Request to Coffee 
County Defendants; Plaintiffs' Third Discovery 
Request to Calhoun County Defendants; Plaintiffs’ 

 



  

Plaintiffs' Third Discovery Request to Pickens 
County Defendants; Plaintiffs' Third Discovery 
Request to Talladega County Defendants; Plain- 
tiffs' Third Discovery Request to Lawrence 
County Defendants 

6/13 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Defendant Etowah 12 
County to Respond Fully to Plaintiffs’ 
First Discovery Request 

6/16 Consent Decree between Plaintiffs and Lee 13 
County Defendants 

6/16 Order - motions to shorten time, to compel 14 
to determine sufficiency of responsess, answer 
or objections 

6/16 Letter to Jack Floyd from Edward Still re 15 
offer of judgment and proposed remedial 
schedule; suggestions for modifications 

6/17 Final Order Approving Crenshaw County 16 
Settlement. 

6/30 Response to Requests for Admissions, Answer to 18 
Plaintiffs' Third Discovery Request, Answers to 
Interrogatories - Calhoun County, Answers to 
Interrogatories - Roy C. Snead, Jr., Answers to 
Interrogatories - Arthur C. Murray, Answers to 

Interrogatories - Clarence W. Page, Answers to 

Interrogatories - Charlie Fuller, Answers to 
Interrogatories - Gerald Wilkerson 

7/1 Letter to Warren Rowe from Blacksher - enclosing 19 
drafts of proposed settlement papers 

7/2 Order granting request for judial notice 20 

7/2 Letter to Menefee from Jack Floyd enclosing 21 
a copy of plan for Etowah County 

7/7 Order - Pickens County - 7/1 motion for con- 22 
tinuance is denied 

1/7 Lawrence County Defendants' Response to 23 
Third Discovery Request 

7/7 Letter to Assistant Attorney General 24 
from Jack Floyd Attorney for Etowah County 
Commission re: Submission under Section 5 
of Voting Rights 

7/10 Order re: Etowah and Pickens Counties motion 25 
to shorten time granted; Etowah County motion 

 



  

7/16 

7/16 

7/17 

7/17 

7/2] 

7/31 

to exclude certain evidence is set for hearing 
at the pretrial conference 

Plaintiffs' Answers to Interrogatories Con- 
cerning Expert Witnesses 

Motion by Etowah County Defendants to Exclude 
Certain Evidence by the Plaintiffs at the 
Trial of this Cause 

Order on Pretrial Hearing, Stipulation, Order 
Tenatively Approving Coffee County Compromise 
and Requiring Notice to the Class 

Order Tentatively Approving Coffee County 
Compromise and Requiring Notice to the Class 
Order denying defendant, Etowah, motion to 
exclude certain evidence 

Order - Cancelling 7/23/86 trial; Status 
Conference for Pickens County is set for 
August 22, 1986; remedial hearing for 
Pickens County set for 9/2/86 

Motion for Extension of Time for 

Submitting Plan 

26 

27 

28 

30 

31

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Defendants' Response to Interrogatories, Timothy A. Hawsey

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in