First Set of Interrogatories to the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
Public Court Documents
1977
12 pages
-
Case Files, Hatcher v. Methodist Hospital - Hardbacks. First Set of Interrogatories to the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1977. 4a51317d-5484-f111-ab0f-7ced8d2181dd. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c53207d2-08f6-4bd3-86d8-d60928fef92e/first-set-of-interrogatories-to-the-us-department-of-health-education-and-welfare. Accessed October 10, 2026.
Copied!
[||1daff2cb-d293-4c1a-863e-f7a3b3b4e84b||] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
HAMMOND DIVISION
RICHARD GORDON HATCHER, )
WILLIE LEE PAGE,
METRO CORPS OF GARY, INC., )
A Not-for-Profit Corporation
and others similarly situated, )
Plaintiffs, )
VS. ) Civil Action No.
METHODIST HOSPITAL OF GARY, ) H 77-154
INC., An Indiana Not-for-
Profit Corporation and DENIS )
E. RIBORDY, as President of
the Board of Directors, et al., )
Defendants. )
FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO THE UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE
Plaintiffs request that defendant Joseph Califano, United
States Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, and his agents
and employees (hereinafter "HEW"), answer under oath, pursuant to
Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the following
interrogatories, and request separate, complete written responses
to each within thirty (30) days after their service. With
respect to each interrogatory please state the source of the
answer given or, if appropriate, the name and title of the
officer, agent or employee having knowledge of the facts.
These interrogatories are to be deemed continuing in nature
and supplemental answers shall be required of you if prior to
Pa
trial you directly or indirectly obtain further or different in-
formation from that contained in the answer.
In answering each interrogatory defendants are requested to
identify in a manner suitable for use as a description in a sub-
poena or notice for production of documents, or to produce: all
of the information (whether documentary, human or otherwise) and
all records maintained by, and/or in the possession or control of
defendants or any other person or organization which pertain or
relate to the information called for by each interrogatory,
whether or not such identification or production is specifically
requested in that interrogatory.
As used herein:
(2) the term "Title VI" means Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 20004;
b) "Section 504" means § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act as
amended in 1973, 29 U.S.C. & 794;
(c) the term "Section 1122" means Section 1122 of the
Social Security Act, as amended in 1972, 42 U.S.C. 1320a-1l.
(d) the term "Hill-Burton" refers to Title VI of the
Public Health Services Act, 42 U.S.C. § 29.
1. Describe the complete assignment and delegation of,
and structure for civil rights responsibilities within HEW:
(a) between the central Office for Civil Rights and
=
central office or divisions administering the substantive HEW
programs;
(b) between the central Office for Civil Rights an of
the regional offices;
(c) between the central offices administering the
Ie
Hh
i
13]
[9
i (T A"
-
é
substantive HEW programs and the regional
(d) between the divisions in th (()
]
[ r i |
0 th
H
h
b
=
( 0) n H {y |
sponsible for or with authority over substantive HEW programs and
the divisions responsible for securing civil rights compliance.
Specifically include responsibility concerning the Hill-Burton
program, and programs established under the Public Health Act and
under. Title V, XVil1i, and XIX of the Social Security Act.
2. Describe any guidelines, directives, policies or agree-
ments which relate to the structures and functions set forth in
the answer to Interrogatory l. State whether, when and why these
guidelines, directives and policies were instituted, and whether,
when and why they have changed since 1970.
3. State the name, position, level or title of the person
responsibile for and/or head of each of the assignments and re-
sponsibilities set forth in Interrogatory 1, specifically includ-
ing the persons in the central office and Region V responsible
for assuring civil rights compliance by Indiana health facilities
receiving federal funds.
4. Describe the complete assignment relationship between
HEW and state agencies which administer state plans with respect
to programs established under the Public Health Act and under
Titles V and XIX of the Social Security Act. Specifically in-
clude the delegation and assignment of civil rights responsibili-
ties; the specific functions and responsibilities of the central
office, the regional offices and the state agencies; whether,
why and to what extent these arrangements differ as between g
different regional offices and different state agencies; and the
extent to which the central office of HEW exerts control
authority over the civil rights responsibilities of the state
agencies.
5. State whether HEW has issued any guidelines, letters
directives, policy statements, manuals, agreements or other com-
munications describing or pertaining to the functions,
and responsibilities set forth in the answer to Interrogatory 4.
If the answer is yes, specifically identify and describe all such
documents.
6. Identify each continuing program, requiring methods of
administration under 45 C.F.R. 80.4 (b), in which any of the other
defendants in this action are participating. Attach copies of
the appropriate methods of administration for each of these pro-
grams.
7. Identify each agency,division, corporation or other
body, including the defendants, which is receiving or has re-
ceived since 1970 federal funds for the provision of health ser
vices, for the construction of health facilities or for the
administration of programs under the Public Health Act, the Hill-
Burton Program and Titles V and XIX of the Social Security Act in
Lake County, Indiana. Include the name of the body, the amount
of money received, the program administered, and the name of any
other body that performed the same functions since 1970.
8. Identify all guidelines and policy statements for
facility and agency compliance with Title VI and/or Section 504
which were given to any of the defendants in this
recipients of federal funds for health facilities or under con-
tinuing programs in Region V and attach copies of each to this
discovery instrument.
9. Describe all actions and communications taken by the
other defendants in this action which assure or purport to give
assurances of compliance with civil rights obligations, incl
but not limited to assurances given pursuant to 45 C.F.R. 80
Specifically identify all documents containing such assurances
including the date received, and attach copies of each to this
discovery instrument.
10. Separately state each and every procedure employed by
the central office and Region V to assure compliance with Title
VI and Section 504 in connection with and as a condition of ap-
proving proposals or applications under Section 1122, the Hil
Burton program, and other health facility construction programs
administered by HEW:
(a) prior to approving such applications and proposals
(b) periodically; and
(c) upon receiving complaints of civil rights violations.
Include the person(s), job title, operating branch or division
guidelines, instructions, agreements and communications to per-
sons 1invalved in such procedures.
ll. Describe every action which you, your agents, employe
or persons acting on behalf of HEW took to assure compliance wit
the requirements of Title VI and Section 504 by Methodist
Hospital of Gary, Inc.:
(a) prior to giving Section 1122 approval to the initial
construction of Broadway Methodist Hospital;
5
Q ee
o jo
r
[=
H
3 (0
)
(b) prior to approving applications for Hill-Burton funds
for the initial construction of Broadway Methodist Hospital
(c) prior to giving Section 1122 approval to the 1974 ap-
plication for the expansion of Broadway Methodist Hospital;
(d) prior to giving Section 1122 approval to the 1976 o ie |
plication for the expansion of Broadway Methodist Hospital;
-
(e) prior to approving the 1976 application for Hill-Burton
funds for the expansion of Broadway Methodist Hospital.
Identify each person by name, job title, operating branch or divi- sion, and location of office (central or regional) who participa-
|
ted in or performed any of the actions described in the answers to
|
. {
this Interrogatory. |
12. If any delegation of any aspect of the responsibility
for assuring civil rights compliance by Methodist Hospital of
Gary, Inc., in connection with Section 1122 proposals and Hill-
Burton applications and funds was given to a state agency:
(a) state the name of all such agencies, the persons in
such agencies authorized to perform such responsibilities and
describe all actions taken:
(b) describe all authority guidelines, and communications
authorizing such delegation; and
(¢) describe the role of HEW in such delegation, including |
the method and nature of review of such state agency action.
13. Describe all procedures required by HEW prior to ap-
proval of a health facility for participation in the Medicare
Medicaid and Title V programs which relate to or are designed to |
secure assurance of compliance with Title VI and Section 504.
Specifically describe and/or attach copies of guidelines
instructions, regulations, directives or agreements pertaining to
such procedures.
3
14. Describe completely all procedures, standards and
guidelines required of state agencies which administer the
Medicaid, and Title VI programs to assure compliance with
state agencies'cbligations under Title VI and Section 504, prior
to their approval of applications by health facilities for
ticipation in these programs. Identify and/or attach copies of
guidelines, instructions, regulations, directives or agreements
pertaining to such procedures.
15. Describe completely all procedures, standards and ie
guidelines promulgated by HEW to assure that health facilities
—
Is i OT
)
td
~
La |
od
approved by state agencies for participation in Me
Title V are in compliance with Title VI and Section 504. Identify
and describe, and/or attach copies of guidelines, instructions,
|
{
|
|
regulations, directives or agreements pertaining to such proced- |
|
ures. |
l6. Describe all procedures, and standards required by HEW |
for Title VI and Section 504 clearance by a health facility prior
to its participation in the Medicare program. Set forth and/or
attach copies of guidelines, instructions, regulations, di-
rectives or agreements pertaining to such procedures. |
17. Describe all procedures promulgated by HEW pursuant to
Title VI and Section 504 regarding civil rights clearance prior
to the commencement of a project to relocate or create a sat-
ellite of a health facility that is participating in the Medicare, J
Medicaid, or Title V programs, Include:
(2a) whether, how and why the procedures differ for each of
the programs; and
(b) the date such procedures were promulgated and by whom.
Identify and describe, and/or attach copies of guidelines, in-
structions, regulations, directives or agreements pertaining to
such procedures.
18. Describe fully all relocations and/or construction of
second hospital facilities by hospitals and other recipients of
federal funds, including Medicare, Medicaid, Title Vv, and Hill-
Burton funds during the past five years. For each include the
following information:
(a) the name of the recipient;
(b) the programs pursuant to which the recipient receives
and/or received federal funding;
(c) the name and location of the original facility, its
capacity, services, and patient population by age, race and na-
tional origin;
(d) the name and location of the relocation or newer facil-
ity, its capacity, services, and patient population by age, race ~
}
(M
h : J )] 4
and national origin;
(e) all studies undertaken regarding these facilities;
(£) all procedures undertaken to assure compliance with
Title VI and Section 504;
19. (a) Set forth the areas and items which any official
or employee of HEW reviews before granting approval to a health
facility, construction proposal, recommended by a state agency,
pursuant to Section 1122 and the Hill-Burton program;
(b) set forth the areas and items which any
Ge
or employee of HEW reviewed before granting approval to the ini-
tial construction of Broadway Methodist Hospital and
approval for the expansion of Broadway Methodist Hospital. Attach
a copy of all letters and/or forms which were issued by HEW in
this regard;
(c) identify each and every HEW official or employee of HEW
who participated in this Section 1122 and Hill-Burton approval of
the initial construction of Broadway Methodist Hospital and the
1976 approval for the expansion of Broadndy Methodist Hospital and
describe his/her role and function in the approval process. 20. For any investigation, report, or document issued or
signed by HEW or anyone acting on its behalf which
applications of Methodist Hospital by Gary, Inc,, for the con-
struction of Broadway Methodist Hospital, the 1976 application
for the expansion of Broadway Methodist Hospital and civil rights
responsibilities, obligations and compliance:
specifically state the date that each such investiga- i
tion, and report was commenced or document was issued;
(c) state the person or persons, and their titles, respon-
sible for issuing the document, or investigation or report;
(d) specifically state all tnformation, and sources, doc- |
umentary or testimonial, upon which the document was based
(e) state the reason for compiling each investigation,
report or document.
21. Describe in detail the factors considered and basis
upon which proposals for the connection and/or expansion of Broad:
way Methodist Hospital were reviewed, evaluated, recommended andAx
approved by HEW. Specifically include:
(a) the role of and weight given to any information
mitted by Methodist Hospital of Gary, Inc., and/or any member of '
its medical and/or nonmedical staff to HEW:
sub-
(b) the projections concerning population growth, comm
development, and need for health facilities in the immediate vi-
cinity of (i) the Merrillville, Indiana site of Broadway Methodist
Hospital and (ii) the Gary, Indiana site of Gary Methodist
Hospital.
22. Describe in detail the factors considered and basis
upon which proposals for the construction and/or expansion
Broadway Methodist Hospital were reviewed, evaluated, recommen
and/or approved by HEW, as to the following items:
(a) location of the laundry at Broadway;
(b) joint and shared planning among hospitals in Lake
County, and particularly any efforts by Methodist Hospital
Gary, Inc., to avoid duplication of services;
(c) plans by Methodist Hospital of Gary, Inc., for
Practice Residence programs;
(d) plans by Methodist Hospital of Gary, Inc., for
tracting and retaining physicians and nurses to and in Gary
(e) the construction and renovation timetable as pro
by Methodist Hospital of Gary, Inc., regarding Gary Methodis
Hospital and Broadway Methodist Hospital;
(f) hospital-based physician offices;
(g) plans for construction of condominium for privat
practice by physicians;
1
|
mended |
i
+=
No de
|
|
{
% :
Family _
BC.
(h) relationship of Methodist Hospital of Gary, Inc.
“lO~
medical schools and plans for medical education training programs,
internships and residencies at Gary Methodist Hospital and
Broadway Methodist Hospital;
(1) health needs and patterns of utilization of medical |
care facilities, and particularly emergency room facilities, by
the following population categories:
{1) black
(2) Hispanic
|
(3) elderly |
(4) handicapped
|
(5) women of child-bearing age
(6) children (under age 18)
(7) lower income residents:
(j) projections as to number of patients by race at each
Health Services Building, Gary and Broadway:
(k) catchment areas of projected patient population groups; |
|
(1) response by community groups;
(m) impact of the construction and/or expansion of
Broadway Methodist Hospital on residents of Calument Township;
(n) problems of convenience and accessibility by lower
income, racial minority, and/or handicapped residents of Gary to
Broadway Methodist Hospital, by public transportation or other-
wise, particularly in relation to use of linear accelerator, out-
patient services and services unavailable at Gary Methodist
Hospital;
(0) impact of the construction and/or expansion of
Broadway Methodist Hospital on Calumet Township in relation to
jobs, housin atterns, roperty values, small businesses, ’ rl
-ll=
pharmacies;
(p) impact of the construction and/or expansion of
Broadway Methodist Hospital on non-medical employees at
Methodist Hospital;
(qd) impact of the construction and/or expansion of
Broadway Methodist Hospital on further potential medical patients
residing in Calument Township;
(r) impact of the construction and/or expansion of
Broadway Methodist Hospital on the location of practice
physician specialists;
de
™X7r
LV
(s) impact of the construction and/or expansion of
Broadway Methodist one (i) the ratio of doctors to patients
on (11) the ratio of nurses to patients at Gary Methodis
Hospital.
Respectfully submitted 14
JACK GREENBERG
MELVYN R. LEVENTHAL
BETH J. LIEF
10 Columbus Circle e
New York, New York 10019
JULIAN B. ALLEN
CHARLES B. MILLER
2009 Broadway
Gary, Indiana 46407
MARILYN G. ROSE
CHRISTINE B. HICKMAN
1751 BN. Street, N.W.
washington, D. C. 20036
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
we) Fie [||1daff2cb-d293-4c1a-863e-f7a3b3b4e84b||]