Memorandum to Counsel RE: Order
Public Court Documents
October 9, 1969

2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Memorandum to Counsel RE: Order, 1969. c267857a-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c6f8d6ad-607d-4a84-b6de-f2ea68ea2c45/memorandum-to-counsel-re-order. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
. at Piet agi ? Sy 4 7 bi A Ne 4 A Anited States Court of Appeals FIFTH CIRCUIT EDWARD W. WADSWORTH OFFICE OF THE CLERK ROOM 408-400 ROYAL ST. CLERK NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130 TEL. NO. B27-.6514 October 9, 1969 MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW: Re: Nos. 28030 & 28042 ~ U, S. A, vs. Hinds County SChool Boar: Gentlemen: (And All Consolidated Cases) The following action has this day been taken in the above case: ( ) Motion to consolidate granted. ( ) Motion to supplement or correct record granted. ( ) Motion of ( : ) for leave to file supplemental brief granted. ( ) Stipulation as to time for filing briefs has been granted. ( ) Motion for leave to file brief in excess of pages under Rule 28 (g) F.R.A.P. granted. d XX¥ The Court’s opinion has this day been rendered and a copy thereof is enclosed. ( ) Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing in excess of pages under Rule 40 (b) F.R.A.P. granted. ( ) A stay of mandate has been granted to and including ( ) Order enclosed has been entered. /fcw Viry truly vous cc: (copy forwarded to all ery Luly yours, counsel of record) EDWARD W. WADSWORTH, Clerk Deputy Clerk FPl MI—5.8.65-10M-2147 IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Nos. 28030 & 28042 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Plaintiff-Appellant, versus HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD Defendants-Appellees. AND ALL CASES INCLUDED IN THE COURT’S ORDER OF JULY 3, 1969 AS SUPPLEMENTED Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (October 9, 1969) Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The Petition for Rehearing is DE- NIED and the Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED. Adm. Office, U.S. Courts—Scofields’ Quality Printers, Inc., N. O., La.