Memorandum to Counsel RE: Order

2 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- Educational Equity
Matter
- Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education
Case
- Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education
U.S. state
- Mississippi
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- c267857a-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421

Cite this item

Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Memorandum to Counsel RE: Order, 1969. c267857a-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c6f8d6ad-607d-4a84-b6de-f2ea68ea2c45/memorandum-to-counsel-re-order. Accessed November 19, 2025.

Copied!

    . at Piet agi ? Sy 4 7 
bi A 

Ne 4 
A 

  

Anited States Court of Appeals 
FIFTH CIRCUIT 

EDWARD W. WADSWORTH OFFICE OF THE CLERK ROOM 408-400 ROYAL ST. CLERK 
NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130 

TEL. NO. B27-.6514 

October 9, 1969 

MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW: 

Re: Nos. 28030 & 28042 ~ U, S. A, vs. Hinds County 
SChool Boar: 

Gentlemen: (And All Consolidated Cases) 

The following action has this day been taken in the above case: 

( ) Motion to consolidate granted. 

( ) Motion to supplement or correct record granted. 

( ) Motion of ( : ) for leave to file supplemental brief granted. 

( ) Stipulation as to time for filing briefs has been granted. 

( ) Motion for leave to file brief in excess of pages under Rule 28 (g) F.R.A.P. granted. d 

XX¥ The Court’s opinion has this day been rendered and a copy thereof is enclosed. 

( ) Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing in excess of pages under Rule 40 (b) 
F.R.A.P. granted. 

( ) A stay of mandate has been granted to and including 

( ) Order enclosed has been entered. 

/fcw 
Viry truly vous cc: (copy forwarded to all ery Luly yours, 

counsel of record) 
EDWARD W. WADSWORTH, Clerk 

Deputy Clerk 

  

FPl MI—5.8.65-10M-2147 

 



IN THE 

United States Court of Appeals 
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

  

Nos. 28030 & 28042 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus 

HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD 

Defendants-Appellees. 

AND ALL CASES INCLUDED IN 

THE COURT’S ORDER OF 

JULY 3, 1969 AS SUPPLEMENTED 

  

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Mississippi 
  

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC 
  

(October 9, 1969) 
  

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY and 

MORGAN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM: The Petition for Rehearing is DE- 

NIED and the Court having been polled at the request 

of one of the members of the Court and a majority 

of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service 

not having voted in favor of it, (Rule 35 Federal Rules 

of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) 

the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED. 

Adm. Office, U.S. Courts—Scofields’ Quality Printers, Inc., N. O., La.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Memorandum to Counsel RE: Order

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in