Motion to Dispense with Printing; Brief Amicus Curiae of William B. Spong, Jr.

     [||bcd0d423-d743-4553-af37-93ac90e5362f||] QamAMmTaQ 
we OJ 

  

TT TT 

Vivid, Llu) 

    

1Q70 

-7 | \V 

        

—r TAADT AD 

Duan UR InG KT. ENRUR 
JAN LILJA 

  

  

NTITART NAMM 71 
ULLADNLAY LL ee VU ON LL 

TI IANA ATNTON wd a 
ALUCVALLUN €1 a8... Ph) 

= ~ 3 i 

DRTNITT 
PRINTING. 

C paefi i ey 
ourt 10x 

  

  moves the I 

  

1" wa ‘IR Cam mg 
WLLi1ldll De ©OPOIE, 

§ Te = AS ernance with nr nttino £ +a Rad Af Ava Leave TO dispense wilh DrinLing Ol wie orlel An 

° -o EY Th PRR TR, 2 
Ol Lhe Parcy 

  

TR RX he TT Si 
JK 0 Ag We PP 0 4 1 ER V0 8) 

I, MR, 1970 AA 
oer .io, 197 » ana 

    

° 

mH 

id Drie 

ober 12, 1970. 

1 PELE, EK. TRI 
2-1Lae 810res 

  

ARI I IE WI 
wl uvil LCW oy ho Tw | 

q 1 3 wh £4 

LL 

    

igh 

ht as Aaocns haa heen cot 4 
Vii LO CAOCT L4CA OO VCCll ~ 

Jo) Me Aelave “nherent in nrintineo and fF Ce fe gelays ingerent in Dining and. I 

And mises Civ vet cvs Tver ma PA Ther TI Sen . TE JERE ee BY. PA 
2 dt A@lcCus Lurliae prevents presentation in uae Fox Provicec by 

Tin Tom oC Maas amit mad rimmbay AF mrt tad rT - wi 13 ETN TVS 2 17 aA 
ALE SY, ALE equired number Oi Printed COplLes id. 08. DPrePRATSl, 11...80 

oc NT aa Mant eg 
as prompioly as praculCale. ana served 

     
se 

  

Pro 
   
  

  

ry. We co . : POT « PSRs pa 
i NCW WMO LIA UC 8 

) od ~ ER 

C ie 

  

Wii J 
[er x 

WGLldilidpy Vv 

 



  

   

mm 
wher be he send 

QTTRPRTVME a) TN TOR TINTTET QMA mea 
UL RANE COUI ih Va Ll UNL LBL OL ALAD 

a PR Dg, om IT wwe TOTO 
VCLODET LCI, Ly (VU 

  

  

JAMES Sie 

  

TONY 

  

  
TOAMTO \ 

LULA L LUN 

  

[Lv MECKLENBURG BOL ARD OF 

  

retitioners, 

  ™ 

eT al., 

  

  

  

  

  
  

  

  

  

All x William B. Spong, Jr., pro se, 

hereby respectfully files a Brief Amicus Curiae in this case. 

The interest of William B. Spong, Jr., arises from the fact 

that he is a United States Senator from the State of Virginia, and 

decisions in this case may be determinative of cases pending in the 

lower federal courts involving the urban school systems of Virginia. 

The School Board of the City of Norfolk, Virginia, filed a 

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari on June 26, 1970, in School Bd. of 

by Norfolk, Va., et al., v. Brewer et al., No. 1753, Oct. Term, 

1969, seeking review of the judgment of the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Fourth Circuit entered on June 1970. That Petition 

was denied on June 29, 1970, the last day of the October, 1969, Term, 

with Mr. Justice Black being of the opinion that Certiorari should be 

granted. The aforesaid Petition is attached hereto and is adopted as 

the Brief which amicus curiae is requesting permission to file 

Many of the issues in the Norfolk case are now before the 

in this case, and those issues are more clearly delineated in the 

Norfolk case than in any other case. The arguments presented in the 

 



  

iC Ea 5 35 S70 
ANU L LV Loe ALT 

~ a  ae i = N aT ~ 
MOL LLULCTIIL Alle Ud     

iis NE EE I Bl Mans oy a A er Ml wD Sr 3 
cage related Cases, alld SuCil arguments may nov UO Lo Lid Lid Vii lo Gadll 

  

3 ia : 5 mi J Ih Ps 
SUCH TIBONer Ly chaey may 

  

¥ nea cont aA de. 
[S Ji Oo TAl UCL vv 

werotvae The ronstdovratiorn whlch 16 werrantad 
meCelve LN COUN LOCIS LION WALCO lo walIalllel. 

  

ectfully submitted, 

  

  

  

15 
¢ KX gn . a det oa 1 WA AT a 
2 dl FL BR PS nS WH HG Se 9 NR RA IE 

  

N -™ I I RE Ai SAC A 
WA OLLLLIE VU ie oe aN DAN) 

 



  

~~ 
WIPREME 
VA Adal dd 

( MAMTA 
Lal fue] 6p

] 

  

  

  

- - vm CULIATNN mde 7 

ULNAR ade MWMIVEIANAY CT UU ddl e 2 

Pad +3 Ava mes 
A&C LL VLVILICT LA oP 

Ve 

a Jy TAS SpE A Si AL pre 
} A 1 HIN R ~<{+ ROAR 

IU AOL LL Lum LN LLIN DUNT DA A 

ay 
YI TDITOATTON ad o 

WE LUGAR LLIN CV Ade 

Reanondent a 
ACO PULILC LILLE » 

  

CTADITT ANT 
SERVICE. 

  

fT oF ~~ oo de Pty pL Te. a ny aa NTN oo keh JT Wh Th = 4 ode 1 hu} Rye? ~ 

inLs L800 CeIrtily Lhet COPLes Ol the atvacnel orliel 

  

7 Veo CAYO TTT M1IMNMAC T= atm 3 1 3 T1Tns + | 
were servea upon Ccounse.l. Jis ced De.Low Oy united 

Ql mbm vies 1 AL mat h, “ o aA way = 1 c rr NYT ~ [i Fg 1.9 ~ 9 + 
OLE TeS Mail, ILY80 CiesSS or aLr mall, as required oy The rules oO 

FURIE RI ae I Be i eT 
cnls vOuYT as r0.L.l0ovsS. 

Tames M 
CATO Mle 

1 ke dg GT Te ™m 4 NT FL ued ~ 1 
dee honorable LIrwin N. Griswold 

      

10 Columbiie C4 rel ANTS AT+AC | £ IInt+ead 10 Columbus Circle Solicitor General of United 
Now Vark New Vark T0010 Clie pn ote ot 0 
DEW LOrK, NeW Lor. .LULls Da ees 

TT; os wv den A i To abu Department of Justice 
T T AX Awan MA nna ea aes Jo he? wv rd ~N SINE" 
J oe LeVonne vinamoexrs Wasl 4 18 con, D. Ue 20530 

(Ih nme ne de 2 1 
LOAMOoe TS CELI ’ ) 

or nS yey Tavira] Raha Morons) & Lanning Honorable Robert Morgan 
YL TT ode Ty vn 3 Ty de amy 2 Ie oe an 2 Sgn gn - 
210 West Lentn otreev Attor ey General 
Ps x npn ™T oy ab ar nT PN ~ Kh £2 WE nie = TR 
Lnariovee, NOt Larollna wea te OL NOYTA Carolina 

23% Tale dein 3 + uy ope 8 
20202 Department of Justice 

es: "Tm oY one] aaeleY = NL. 

Raleigh, North Carolina 
; 3% 7 Tho Mh J ANNE Sih XT or. Ot Per Ws pa 
wilillam Joe wa ggon or 

rl wn uh aed wn Wie or orm es ve oF TH, vo ot Ran SamTnrn Q TA 1 
einstein, waggoner, ourges, Lenjamin oe. norack 

30 TA" 1 ot: NA - «Tn Ervin, Horack and McCartha 

    

  

\ Eo 7 i 

wl. 

  

14am R 
A LCGLUL Je [||bcd0d423-d743-4553-af37-93ac90e5362f||]