Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees
Public Court Documents
March 20, 2000

6 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees, 2000. e42fabcb-e10e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ca41a61e-a06e-44ad-92fc-8481f3c5f7ce/plaintiffs-motion-for-attorneys-fees. Accessed May 14, 2025.
Copied!
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION Civil Action No. 4:96-CV-104-BO(3) IN j | EF D MARTIN CROMARTIE, et al., ) in; = Plaintiffs, ) doris LAVID WW Danie ) US Dist EL CLERK v. ) B) “COURT, epne ) 5 DEP. Cregg JAMES B. HUNT, in his official capacity ) as Governor of the State of North Carolina, ) ct al., ) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR State Defendants, ) ATTORNEYS’ FEES ) and ) ) ALFRED SMALLWOOD, et al., ) Defendant-Intervenors. ) ) Plaintiffs respectfully move for appropriate attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988 for the services of their attorneys in this action and further move that the determination of the entitlement to fees and the computation thereof be deferred until a later time after the ments of plaintiffs’ claim have been finally adjudicated and after the attorneys for the various parties have an adequate opportunity for discussion of the services provided and time expended and for seeking a settlement of this claim. In support of their motion plaintiffs show: |) This litigation was commenced in July, 1996, and after a hearing was stayed until October, 1997. 2) In March, 1998 a hearing took place on motions for summary judgment made by the plaintiffs and by the defendants. 60d Syp:¢1 00. OC Jel $9.991.616: xe 4 LIT WIAs 0H wr pA SL Ss AG A ———— “ PR, . Vos pre 3) After summary judgment had been entered which enjoined the use of the 1997 Redistricting Plan, and after stay of that injunction had been denied, a hearing took place concerning a remedial plan. 4) An appeal was taken by the defendants to the Supreme Court, which noted probable jurisdiction, received briefs, heard oral argument on January 21, 1999, and then reversed the summary judgment and remanded the case for trial. 5) Extensive discovery took place during September and October, 1999, which was followed by trial on November 29, 1999 through December 1, 1999. 6) On March 7, 2000, the District Court entered an Order and Opinion holding the Twelfth District unconstitutional and enjoining its use for the year 2000 primaries and elections. 7) After defendants had applied for a stay and plaintiffs had responded thereto, the District Court denied a stay but the Supreme Court then granted a stay pending completion of an appeal by defendants and defendant-intervenors. 8) In providing to plaintiffs the legal services necessary to achieve a favorable result, their attorneys have expended great amounts of time and effort. Robinson O. Everett has been the lead attorney since the action was commenced in July 1996. Martin B. McGee has performed extensive legal services for plaintiffs after the dissolution of the stay occurred in October 1997 and the filing of an amended complaint through the summary judgment and its appeal to the Supreme Court in 1998 and 1999, and thereafter through the discovery and trial in 1999. Douglas Markham participated in the discovery period and trial from August through December, 1999. Seth Neyhart participated in the preparation for discovery, discovery and trial from June, 1999 through December, 1999. In addition to these four attorneys, plaintiffs also have had the i 01 °d 9p:C1 00. OC Je 9.991.616: XE 117 W155 ag Ji benefit of the legal services of Robert Popper, Esquire, two student paralegals--Julie Niemeyer and Jamie Davenport--and technical and secretarial assistants. 9) In the Shaw litigation when Robinson O. Everett was lead counsel for the plaintiffs, he and Deputy Attorney General Speas discussed and settled the issue of plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees, which did not have to be adjudicated by the District Court; and they have already informally discussed delaying the matter of plaintiffs’ attorneys fees by consent until a later time after the Supreme Court of the United States has disposed of the appeal pending before it. 10) From the discussion between plaintiffs’ attomey Everett and Deputy Attorney General Speas, it appears that, subject to reservation of defendants’ rights to dispute the entitlement to and amount of attorneys fees for plaintiffs, defendants will consent to this motion which seeks to allow plaintiffs to preserve whatever rights they might otherwise have to receive attorneys’ fees without requiring further documentation by plaintiffs at this time. Wherefore, plaintiffs respectfully pray that they be allowed to preserve any right they would otherwise have to receive attorneys’ fees without filing any further specification or documentation of attorneys’ fees at this time and that, if after discussion between the attorneys for the parties no agreement can be reached, this court shall enter into such Order as it deems appropriate with respect to establishing attorneys’ fees. 11d 9:1 00. OZ Jel £9.991.616: Xe 117 WI 3a% 90 I 13 Ns Respectfully submitted this 20™ day of March, Ai). Robinson O. Everett Everett & Everett N.C. State Bar No.: 1385 Attorney for the Plaintiffs P.O. Box 586 Durham, NC 27702 Telephone: (919)-682-5691 Williams, Boger, Grady, Davis & Tuttle, P.A. by: Martin B. McGee State Bar No.: 22198 Attorneys for the Plaintiffs P.O. Box 810 Concord, NC 28026-0810 Telephone: (704)-782-1173 Douglas E. Markham Texas State Bar No. 12986975 Attorney for the Plaintiffs 333 Clay Suite 4510 Post Office Box 130923 Houston, TX 77219-0923 Telephone: (713) 655-8700 Facsimile: (713) 655-870] ld ap:Z1 00. OC JEW 9.991.616: Xe 117 WI 5dS an Jy o © te @ sod A. Yloyln ts Seth A. Nevhart Wisconsin State Bar Ns 1035049 N7983 Town Hall Road Eldorado, WI 54932 Telephone: (920) 872-2643 Robert Popper Law Office of Neil Brickman 630 3" Ave., 21% Floor New York, NY 10017 ¢1°d ap:Z1 00. OZ JEW 9.991.616: <k 1171 W1380%5 Si TN CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that [ have this day served the foregoing Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees by hand delivery to the following addresses: Tiare Smiley North Carolina Department of Justice P.O. Box 629 Raleigh, NC 27602 Mr. Adam Stein Ferguson, Stein Wallas, Adkins, Gresham, Sumter, P.A., 312 W. Franklin St. Chapel Hill, NC 27516 This the 20" day of March, 2000. AL Robinson O. Everett Attorney for the Plaintiffs F1°d ap:Z1 00. OC EW 9991616: XE 117 WBIJ3d4S 9d IN