Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees
Public Court Documents
March 20, 2000
6 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees, 2000. e42fabcb-e10e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ca41a61e-a06e-44ad-92fc-8481f3c5f7ce/plaintiffs-motion-for-attorneys-fees. Accessed November 19, 2025.
Copied!
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
Civil Action No. 4:96-CV-104-BO(3) IN j | EF D
MARTIN CROMARTIE, et al., ) in; =
Plaintiffs, ) doris
LAVID WW Danie
) US Dist EL CLERK v. ) B) “COURT, epne
) 5 DEP. Cregg
JAMES B. HUNT, in his official capacity )
as Governor of the State of North Carolina, )
ct al., ) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
State Defendants, ) ATTORNEYS’ FEES
)
and )
)
ALFRED SMALLWOOD, et al., )
Defendant-Intervenors. )
)
Plaintiffs respectfully move for appropriate attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988 for
the services of their attorneys in this action and further move that the determination of the
entitlement to fees and the computation thereof be deferred until a later time after the ments of
plaintiffs’ claim have been finally adjudicated and after the attorneys for the various parties have
an adequate opportunity for discussion of the services provided and time expended and for
seeking a settlement of this claim.
In support of their motion plaintiffs show:
|) This litigation was commenced in July, 1996, and after a hearing was stayed until
October, 1997.
2) In March, 1998 a hearing took place on motions for summary judgment made by the
plaintiffs and by the defendants.
60d Syp:¢1 00. OC Jel $9.991.616: xe 4 LIT WIAs 0H
wr pA SL Ss AG A ———— “ PR, . Vos pre
3) After summary judgment had been entered which enjoined the use of the 1997
Redistricting Plan, and after stay of that injunction had been denied, a hearing took place
concerning a remedial plan.
4) An appeal was taken by the defendants to the Supreme Court, which noted probable
jurisdiction, received briefs, heard oral argument on January 21, 1999, and then reversed the
summary judgment and remanded the case for trial.
5) Extensive discovery took place during September and October, 1999, which was
followed by trial on November 29, 1999 through December 1, 1999.
6) On March 7, 2000, the District Court entered an Order and Opinion holding the
Twelfth District unconstitutional and enjoining its use for the year 2000 primaries and elections.
7) After defendants had applied for a stay and plaintiffs had responded thereto, the
District Court denied a stay but the Supreme Court then granted a stay pending completion of an
appeal by defendants and defendant-intervenors.
8) In providing to plaintiffs the legal services necessary to achieve a favorable result, their
attorneys have expended great amounts of time and effort. Robinson O. Everett has been the
lead attorney since the action was commenced in July 1996. Martin B. McGee has performed
extensive legal services for plaintiffs after the dissolution of the stay occurred in October 1997
and the filing of an amended complaint through the summary judgment and its appeal to the
Supreme Court in 1998 and 1999, and thereafter through the discovery and trial in 1999.
Douglas Markham participated in the discovery period and trial from August through December,
1999. Seth Neyhart participated in the preparation for discovery, discovery and trial from June,
1999 through December, 1999. In addition to these four attorneys, plaintiffs also have had the
i
01 °d 9p:C1 00. OC Je 9.991.616: XE 117 W155 ag Ji
benefit of the legal services of Robert Popper, Esquire, two student paralegals--Julie Niemeyer
and Jamie Davenport--and technical and secretarial assistants.
9) In the Shaw litigation when Robinson O. Everett was lead counsel for the plaintiffs, he
and Deputy Attorney General Speas discussed and settled the issue of plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees,
which did not have to be adjudicated by the District Court; and they have already informally
discussed delaying the matter of plaintiffs’ attorneys fees by consent until a later time after the
Supreme Court of the United States has disposed of the appeal pending before it.
10) From the discussion between plaintiffs’ attomey Everett and Deputy Attorney
General Speas, it appears that, subject to reservation of defendants’ rights to dispute the
entitlement to and amount of attorneys fees for plaintiffs, defendants will consent to this motion
which seeks to allow plaintiffs to preserve whatever rights they might otherwise have to receive
attorneys’ fees without requiring further documentation by plaintiffs at this time.
Wherefore, plaintiffs respectfully pray that they be allowed to preserve any right they
would otherwise have to receive attorneys’ fees without filing any further specification or
documentation of attorneys’ fees at this time and that, if after discussion between the attorneys
for the parties no agreement can be reached, this court shall enter into such Order as it deems
appropriate with respect to establishing attorneys’ fees.
11d 9:1 00. OZ Jel £9.991.616: Xe 117 WI 3a% 90 I 13 Ns
Respectfully submitted this 20™ day of March,
Ai).
Robinson O. Everett
Everett & Everett
N.C. State Bar No.: 1385
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
P.O. Box 586
Durham, NC 27702
Telephone: (919)-682-5691
Williams, Boger, Grady, Davis & Tuttle, P.A.
by:
Martin B. McGee
State Bar No.: 22198
Attorneys for the Plaintiffs
P.O. Box 810
Concord, NC 28026-0810
Telephone: (704)-782-1173
Douglas E. Markham
Texas State Bar No. 12986975
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
333 Clay Suite 4510
Post Office Box 130923
Houston, TX 77219-0923
Telephone: (713) 655-8700
Facsimile: (713) 655-870]
ld ap:Z1 00. OC JEW 9.991.616: Xe 117 WI 5dS an Jy
o © te @
sod A. Yloyln ts
Seth A. Nevhart
Wisconsin State Bar Ns 1035049
N7983 Town Hall Road
Eldorado, WI 54932
Telephone: (920) 872-2643
Robert Popper
Law Office of Neil Brickman
630 3" Ave., 21% Floor
New York, NY 10017
¢1°d ap:Z1 00. OZ JEW 9.991.616: <k 1171 W1380%5 Si TN
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that [ have this day served the foregoing Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees by hand delivery to the following addresses:
Tiare Smiley
North Carolina Department of Justice
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, NC 27602
Mr. Adam Stein
Ferguson, Stein Wallas, Adkins, Gresham, Sumter, P.A.,
312 W. Franklin St.
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
This the 20" day of March, 2000.
AL
Robinson O. Everett
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
F1°d ap:Z1 00. OC EW 9991616: XE 117 WBIJ3d4S 9d IN