Order Transferring Columbia School District Case
Public Court Documents
January 9, 1974
10 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Order Transferring Columbia School District Case, 1974. 628e7984-d167-f011-bec2-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/cb6b0150-25ed-436a-8932-014f1ee3b82b/order-transferring-columbia-school-district-case. Accessed November 21, 2025.
Copied!
\C Nos. 28030 & 28042
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Vv,
HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 4075(J))
BUFORD A LEE, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Vv,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellant,
Vv. J
MILTON EVANS,
Third Party
Defendant-Appellee.
(Civil Action No. 2034(H))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve.
KEMPER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1373(E))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve
NORTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 3807(J))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve.
NATCHEZ SPECIAL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1120(W))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Vv,
COVINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 2148(H))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Vv,
LAWRENCE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 2216(H))
JEREMIAH BLACKWELL, JR., et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
V.
' ISSAQUENA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1096(W))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Vv.
WILKINSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1160(W))
CHARLES KILLINGSWORTH, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Vv.
THE ENTERPRISE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT
and QUITMAN CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1302(E))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Vv.
LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 4292 (J))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v,
MARION COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 2178(H))
JOAN ANDERSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Intervenor,
Appellant,
Ve
THE CANTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
and THE MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
et:al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 3700 (J))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve.
SOUTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 3984 (J))
BEATRICE ALEXANDER, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Vv,
HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 3779 (J))
ROY LEE HARRIS, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Ve
THE YAZOO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1209(W))
JOHN BARNHARDT, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
V.
MERIDIAN SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1300 (E))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Vv.
NESHOBA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, ét al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1396(E))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellent,
Vv,
NOXUBEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1372(E))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
y,
LAUDERDALE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1367 (E))
DIAN HUDSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Intervenor-
Appellant,
Ve.
LEAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 3382 (J))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v,
COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 2199 (H))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Vv.
AMITE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 3983(J))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve
PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1368 (E))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Vv.
FRANKLIN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 4256 (J))
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Mississippi
ORDER
Pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court
in Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 1969
3%6.U.8. 19, 90S. Ct. 29, 24 L. Ed. 24 19, this Court
has retained jurisdiction of the within captioned
school cases pending the desegregation of each system.
Subsequent to this decision of the Supreme Court,
the following orders were entered by this Court with
respect to Columbia Municipal Separate School District:
(1) United States v. Hinds County School Board,
5 Cir., November 7, 1969, 423 F. 2d 1264 (Columbia
Municipal Separate School District);
(2) United States v. Hinds County School Board,
5 Cir., March 30, 1970, 423 PF. 24 1264 {Columbia
Municipal Separate School District);
(3) United States of America v. Columbia
Municipal Separate School District, November 19, 1969,
Nos. 28030-28042;
(4) United States of America v. Columbia
Municipal Separate School District, November 8, 1971,
Nos. 28030-28042.
Meanwhile the semi-annual status reports required
by our decision in United States v. Hinds County School
Board, 5 Cir., 1970, 433 F. 2d 611, 618-19, have been
filed through and including October 15, 1973.
It now appearing that the Columbia Municipal
Separate School District school system has been and is
being maintained as a unitary school system in compliance
with the aforesaid orders, and it further appearing that
it would be appropriate to transfer jurisdiction of the
case to the district court under a final order there to
be entered as follows, it is ORDERED:
(1) Jurisdiction of No. 2199(H), United States
of America v. Columbia Municipal Separate School District,
is hereby transferred to the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi;
(2) Said case may be placed on the inactive
docket of that court subject to being reopened for good
cause shown on the application of any party, or inter-
venor, or sua sponte;
(3) The aforesaid orders entered by this Court
shall be considered as the mandate of this Court and
are to be made the order of the district court;
(4) The reports required by United States v.
Hinds County School Board, 433 F. 2d 618-19, supra, may
be discontinued in the event copies of the Summary Re-
ports (Forms 101 and 102) which are filed annually with
the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, along
with a report showing faculty ani staff assignments as
required in the Hinds County type of report and faculty
and staff hiring by race if such information is not re-
flected in the HEW Summary Reports, are filed simultane-
ously with the district court and served upon counsel
for plaintiffs and amicus curiae, and are vetolned for a
period of two years by the district Count for examination
by counsel for the parties herein or amicus curiae. As
an alternative to filing the HEW reports, the defendant
school districts may continue to file the Hinds County
type of report but on an annual basis not later than
November 15 to reflect status as of October 15 each year.
. »
iy TAY
IT IS SO ORDERED this FH, ay Ely it
4 a Ve SON 2. (gr
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE
Nisa inline
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT ih
ZL Pun, ii
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CIA A
Fi for Plaintift { /
= i TT WO x of
Attorney for Defendant
TARAS
Attorney for Amicus Curihe